THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDY

The rhetoric is guided by three dimensions: logos, pathos and ethos. Logos is the speech itself, pathos are the passions that the speaker, through logos, awakens in his audience, and ethos is the image that the speaker creates of himself, also through logos, in front of an audience. The rhetorical...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maria Flávia Figueiredo, Alan Ribeiro Radi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2016-07-01
Series:Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/textolivre/article/view/10282
id doaj-4f3e0d7fc5c54c59b2259287a0da086b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f3e0d7fc5c54c59b2259287a0da086b2021-01-02T11:01:09ZengUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisTexto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia1983-36522016-07-01914861http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/1983-3652.9.1.48-61THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDYMaria Flávia Figueiredo0Alan Ribeiro Radi1Universidade de FrancaUniversidade de Franca The rhetoric is guided by three dimensions: logos, pathos and ethos. Logos is the speech itself, pathos are the passions that the speaker, through logos, awakens in his audience, and ethos is the image that the speaker creates of himself, also through logos, in front of an audience. The rhetorical genres are three: deliberative (which drives the audience or the judge to think about future events, characterizing them as convenient or harmful), judiciary (the audience thinks about past events in order to classify them as fair or unfair) and epidictic (the audience will judge any fact occurred, or even the character of a person as beautiful or not). According to Figueiredo (2014) and based on Eggs (2005), we advocate that ethos is not a mark left by the speaker only in rhetorical genres, but in any textual genre, once the result of human production, the simplest choices in textual construction, are able to reproduce something that is closely linked to speaker, thus, demarcating hir/her ethos. To verify this assumption, we selected a display of a video of the comedian Danilo Gentili, which will be examined in the light of Rhetoric and Textual Linguistics. So, our objective is to find, in the stand-up comedy genre, marks left by the speaker in the speech that characterizes his/her ethos. The analysis results show that ethos, discursive genre and communicational purpose amalgamate in an indissoluble complex in which the success of one of them interdepends on how the other was built.http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/textolivre/article/view/10282ethostextual genresstand-up comedyrhetoricintertextuality
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria Flávia Figueiredo
Alan Ribeiro Radi
spellingShingle Maria Flávia Figueiredo
Alan Ribeiro Radi
THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDY
Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia
ethos
textual genres
stand-up comedy
rhetoric
intertextuality
author_facet Maria Flávia Figueiredo
Alan Ribeiro Radi
author_sort Maria Flávia Figueiredo
title THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDY
title_short THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDY
title_full THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDY
title_fullStr THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDY
title_full_unstemmed THE HUMOROUS SPEAKER: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ETHOS IN COMEDY
title_sort humorous speaker: the construction of ethos in comedy
publisher Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
series Texto Livre: Linguagem e Tecnologia
issn 1983-3652
publishDate 2016-07-01
description The rhetoric is guided by three dimensions: logos, pathos and ethos. Logos is the speech itself, pathos are the passions that the speaker, through logos, awakens in his audience, and ethos is the image that the speaker creates of himself, also through logos, in front of an audience. The rhetorical genres are three: deliberative (which drives the audience or the judge to think about future events, characterizing them as convenient or harmful), judiciary (the audience thinks about past events in order to classify them as fair or unfair) and epidictic (the audience will judge any fact occurred, or even the character of a person as beautiful or not). According to Figueiredo (2014) and based on Eggs (2005), we advocate that ethos is not a mark left by the speaker only in rhetorical genres, but in any textual genre, once the result of human production, the simplest choices in textual construction, are able to reproduce something that is closely linked to speaker, thus, demarcating hir/her ethos. To verify this assumption, we selected a display of a video of the comedian Danilo Gentili, which will be examined in the light of Rhetoric and Textual Linguistics. So, our objective is to find, in the stand-up comedy genre, marks left by the speaker in the speech that characterizes his/her ethos. The analysis results show that ethos, discursive genre and communicational purpose amalgamate in an indissoluble complex in which the success of one of them interdepends on how the other was built.
topic ethos
textual genres
stand-up comedy
rhetoric
intertextuality
url http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/textolivre/article/view/10282
work_keys_str_mv AT mariaflaviafigueiredo thehumorousspeakertheconstructionofethosincomedy
AT alanribeiroradi thehumorousspeakertheconstructionofethosincomedy
AT mariaflaviafigueiredo humorousspeakertheconstructionofethosincomedy
AT alanribeiroradi humorousspeakertheconstructionofethosincomedy
_version_ 1724355241408724992