Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"

<span>The paper analyses the phenomenon of iconicity in relation to its significance for literary theory. One of the key notions in modern philosophy of language and linguistics, iconicity is seen as a motivated interrelation beween form and meaning. In this, it is akin to mimesis - one of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elżbieta Tabakowska
Format: Article
Language:Polish
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu 2007-04-01
Series:Przestrzenie Teorii
Online Access:http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/11452
id doaj-4f19a61ec7eb4f17946c122e60545d28
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f19a61ec7eb4f17946c122e60545d282020-11-25T00:45:55ZpolWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w PoznaniuPrzestrzenie Teorii1644-67632450-57652007-04-010210311810.14746/pt.2003.2.710979Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"Elżbieta Tabakowska<span>The paper analyses the phenomenon of iconicity in relation to its significance for literary theory. One of the key notions in modern philosophy of language and linguistics, iconicity is seen as a motivated interrelation beween form and meaning. In this, it is akin to mimesis - one of the basic concepts in theory of literature. Based on similarity, iconicity requires a conscious presence of an observer, who discovers and states the existence of similarity by reference to a tertium comparationis. It occurs as an effect of a mental process, as an interface bewteen semantics (the level of conventionalized meaning) and pragmatics (the level of contextual modifications of meaning). Thus it is intrinsically subjective: a representation of things as seen by a cognizant mind. Defined as a similarity between a conceptual structure and a linguistic form created by the mind, iconicity is manifested as sequentiality, proximity or quantity of elements; it is either imagic or diagrammatic. As a property of all texts and all discourse, it blurs the traditional distinction between "literary" and "non-literary" uses of language: the difference reduces to one of quantity, which "literatury" being characterised by a larger quantity of motivated interrelationships combined with a lower level of their conventionalization. The author concludes by claiming that - like mimesis - iconicity may be profitably discussed in terms of Roland Langacker's notion of subjectification, with the tertium comparationis present in the mind rher than in the external reality.</span>http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/11452
collection DOAJ
language Polish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elżbieta Tabakowska
spellingShingle Elżbieta Tabakowska
Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"
Przestrzenie Teorii
author_facet Elżbieta Tabakowska
author_sort Elżbieta Tabakowska
title Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"
title_short Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"
title_full Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"
title_fullStr Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"
title_full_unstemmed Ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"
title_sort ikoniczność: podobieństwo i „tertium comparationis"
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
series Przestrzenie Teorii
issn 1644-6763
2450-5765
publishDate 2007-04-01
description <span>The paper analyses the phenomenon of iconicity in relation to its significance for literary theory. One of the key notions in modern philosophy of language and linguistics, iconicity is seen as a motivated interrelation beween form and meaning. In this, it is akin to mimesis - one of the basic concepts in theory of literature. Based on similarity, iconicity requires a conscious presence of an observer, who discovers and states the existence of similarity by reference to a tertium comparationis. It occurs as an effect of a mental process, as an interface bewteen semantics (the level of conventionalized meaning) and pragmatics (the level of contextual modifications of meaning). Thus it is intrinsically subjective: a representation of things as seen by a cognizant mind. Defined as a similarity between a conceptual structure and a linguistic form created by the mind, iconicity is manifested as sequentiality, proximity or quantity of elements; it is either imagic or diagrammatic. As a property of all texts and all discourse, it blurs the traditional distinction between "literary" and "non-literary" uses of language: the difference reduces to one of quantity, which "literatury" being characterised by a larger quantity of motivated interrelationships combined with a lower level of their conventionalization. The author concludes by claiming that - like mimesis - iconicity may be profitably discussed in terms of Roland Langacker's notion of subjectification, with the tertium comparationis present in the mind rher than in the external reality.</span>
url http://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/pt/article/view/11452
work_keys_str_mv AT elzbietatabakowska ikonicznoscpodobienstwoitertiumcomparationis
_version_ 1725268106406789120