Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, China

Luanchuan County, located in the mountains of Western Henan Province, is characterized by poor geological environment and abundant material sources and rainfalls. Debris flows have occurred many times in this county, and in some gully debris flows exhibit a large scale, requiring risk assessment. In...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chen Pengyu, Kong Ying
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:MATEC Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817504025
id doaj-4f067b805a934c3289e49ae3abdf87f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4f067b805a934c3289e49ae3abdf87f62021-02-02T04:38:56ZengEDP SciencesMATEC Web of Conferences2261-236X2018-01-011750402510.1051/matecconf/201817504025matecconf_ifcae-iot2018_04025Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, ChinaChen PengyuKong YingLuanchuan County, located in the mountains of Western Henan Province, is characterized by poor geological environment and abundant material sources and rainfalls. Debris flows have occurred many times in this county, and in some gully debris flows exhibit a large scale, requiring risk assessment. In the multi-factor comprehensive assessment methods for debris flow risk, it is really important to determine the weight of each factor since this affects the reliability of the assessment results. Given that the subjective weighting method can accurately reflect the importance of each factor, in order to improve the reliability of subjective weighting, the group decision making method is used to determine the weight of each factor. Group decision making is realized using the analytic hierarchy process and the data fusion algorithm. In this method, the expert combination weight is determined; on this basis, a model for comprehensive assessment of debris flow risk is established by the linear weighted sum method, and risk assessment is performed for gullies with medium to large-scale debris flows in the study area. The assessment results show that all debris flow gullies face minor to moderate risks. For gullies with high risk degree, it is suggested to timely clear material sources in channels and construct or reinforce retaining dams in order to prevent re-occurrence of debris flows.https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817504025
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Chen Pengyu
Kong Ying
spellingShingle Chen Pengyu
Kong Ying
Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, China
MATEC Web of Conferences
author_facet Chen Pengyu
Kong Ying
author_sort Chen Pengyu
title Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, China
title_short Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, China
title_full Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, China
title_fullStr Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, China
title_full_unstemmed Risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – A case study of Luanchuan County, Henan Province, China
title_sort risk assessment of debris flow based on group decision making – a case study of luanchuan county, henan province, china
publisher EDP Sciences
series MATEC Web of Conferences
issn 2261-236X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Luanchuan County, located in the mountains of Western Henan Province, is characterized by poor geological environment and abundant material sources and rainfalls. Debris flows have occurred many times in this county, and in some gully debris flows exhibit a large scale, requiring risk assessment. In the multi-factor comprehensive assessment methods for debris flow risk, it is really important to determine the weight of each factor since this affects the reliability of the assessment results. Given that the subjective weighting method can accurately reflect the importance of each factor, in order to improve the reliability of subjective weighting, the group decision making method is used to determine the weight of each factor. Group decision making is realized using the analytic hierarchy process and the data fusion algorithm. In this method, the expert combination weight is determined; on this basis, a model for comprehensive assessment of debris flow risk is established by the linear weighted sum method, and risk assessment is performed for gullies with medium to large-scale debris flows in the study area. The assessment results show that all debris flow gullies face minor to moderate risks. For gullies with high risk degree, it is suggested to timely clear material sources in channels and construct or reinforce retaining dams in order to prevent re-occurrence of debris flows.
url https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817504025
work_keys_str_mv AT chenpengyu riskassessmentofdebrisflowbasedongroupdecisionmakingacasestudyofluanchuancountyhenanprovincechina
AT kongying riskassessmentofdebrisflowbasedongroupdecisionmakingacasestudyofluanchuancountyhenanprovincechina
_version_ 1724305363284525056