Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective

This article examines the effects of time pressure on innovation. Does time pressure stimulate or eliminate innovation or, in other words, should managers increase or reduce time pressures if they are trying to enhance innovation in their firms? Unfortunately, current research on the subject is ambi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Blair Winsor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Carleton University 2012-08-01
Series:Technology Innovation Management Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Winsor_TIMReview_August2012.pdf
id doaj-4ef83df259be44d2b6747cbee765f332
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ef83df259be44d2b6747cbee765f3322020-11-24T22:27:14ZengCarleton UniversityTechnology Innovation Management Review1927-03212012-08-01August 2012: Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century59Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical PerspectiveBlair WinsorThis article examines the effects of time pressure on innovation. Does time pressure stimulate or eliminate innovation or, in other words, should managers increase or reduce time pressures if they are trying to enhance innovation in their firms? Unfortunately, current research on the subject is ambivalent. To provide some clarity, this innovation management dilemma was examined in a fast-growing, medium-sized communication and IT consultancy (“First”), which claimed to be “highly innovative”. Detailed data on five projects was collected over an 18-month period using practice-based methods. Each project team was followed in real time via observation and interviews. The data was then analyzed by dividing project work into three phases: i) negotiating the project particulars with the client; ii) conducting project work; and iii) project evaluation. This detailed analysis revealed how time pressures eliminated innovation in First’s client-based project work and suggested three implications for the management of innovation. Firstly, managers should try to avoid imposing excessive time pressures on their project teams. Secondly, they should ensure that there is space between projects to enable reflection. Thirdly, managers should ensure that project debriefs occur and that they cover potential innovations. http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Winsor_TIMReview_August2012.pdf consultancyinnovationpractice-based approachtime
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Blair Winsor
spellingShingle Blair Winsor
Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective
Technology Innovation Management Review
consultancy
innovation
practice-based approach
time
author_facet Blair Winsor
author_sort Blair Winsor
title Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective
title_short Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective
title_full Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective
title_fullStr Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective
title_full_unstemmed Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective
title_sort managing innovation under time pressure: a practical perspective
publisher Carleton University
series Technology Innovation Management Review
issn 1927-0321
publishDate 2012-08-01
description This article examines the effects of time pressure on innovation. Does time pressure stimulate or eliminate innovation or, in other words, should managers increase or reduce time pressures if they are trying to enhance innovation in their firms? Unfortunately, current research on the subject is ambivalent. To provide some clarity, this innovation management dilemma was examined in a fast-growing, medium-sized communication and IT consultancy (“First”), which claimed to be “highly innovative”. Detailed data on five projects was collected over an 18-month period using practice-based methods. Each project team was followed in real time via observation and interviews. The data was then analyzed by dividing project work into three phases: i) negotiating the project particulars with the client; ii) conducting project work; and iii) project evaluation. This detailed analysis revealed how time pressures eliminated innovation in First’s client-based project work and suggested three implications for the management of innovation. Firstly, managers should try to avoid imposing excessive time pressures on their project teams. Secondly, they should ensure that there is space between projects to enable reflection. Thirdly, managers should ensure that project debriefs occur and that they cover potential innovations.
topic consultancy
innovation
practice-based approach
time
url http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Winsor_TIMReview_August2012.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT blairwinsor managinginnovationundertimepressureapracticalperspective
_version_ 1725750692873764864