Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective
This article examines the effects of time pressure on innovation. Does time pressure stimulate or eliminate innovation or, in other words, should managers increase or reduce time pressures if they are trying to enhance innovation in their firms? Unfortunately, current research on the subject is ambi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Carleton University
2012-08-01
|
Series: | Technology Innovation Management Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Winsor_TIMReview_August2012.pdf |
id |
doaj-4ef83df259be44d2b6747cbee765f332 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4ef83df259be44d2b6747cbee765f3322020-11-24T22:27:14ZengCarleton UniversityTechnology Innovation Management Review1927-03212012-08-01August 2012: Entrepreneurship in the 21st Century59Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical PerspectiveBlair WinsorThis article examines the effects of time pressure on innovation. Does time pressure stimulate or eliminate innovation or, in other words, should managers increase or reduce time pressures if they are trying to enhance innovation in their firms? Unfortunately, current research on the subject is ambivalent. To provide some clarity, this innovation management dilemma was examined in a fast-growing, medium-sized communication and IT consultancy (“First”), which claimed to be “highly innovative”. Detailed data on five projects was collected over an 18-month period using practice-based methods. Each project team was followed in real time via observation and interviews. The data was then analyzed by dividing project work into three phases: i) negotiating the project particulars with the client; ii) conducting project work; and iii) project evaluation. This detailed analysis revealed how time pressures eliminated innovation in First’s client-based project work and suggested three implications for the management of innovation. Firstly, managers should try to avoid imposing excessive time pressures on their project teams. Secondly, they should ensure that there is space between projects to enable reflection. Thirdly, managers should ensure that project debriefs occur and that they cover potential innovations. http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Winsor_TIMReview_August2012.pdf consultancyinnovationpractice-based approachtime |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Blair Winsor |
spellingShingle |
Blair Winsor Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective Technology Innovation Management Review consultancy innovation practice-based approach time |
author_facet |
Blair Winsor |
author_sort |
Blair Winsor |
title |
Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective |
title_short |
Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective |
title_full |
Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective |
title_fullStr |
Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managing Innovation under Time Pressure: A Practical Perspective |
title_sort |
managing innovation under time pressure: a practical perspective |
publisher |
Carleton University |
series |
Technology Innovation Management Review |
issn |
1927-0321 |
publishDate |
2012-08-01 |
description |
This article examines the effects of time pressure on innovation. Does time pressure stimulate or eliminate innovation or, in other words, should managers increase or reduce time pressures if they are trying to enhance innovation in their firms? Unfortunately, current research on the subject is ambivalent. To provide some clarity, this innovation management dilemma was examined in a fast-growing, medium-sized communication and IT consultancy (“First”), which claimed to be “highly innovative”. Detailed data on five projects was collected over an 18-month period using practice-based methods. Each project team was followed in real time via observation and interviews. The data was then analyzed by dividing project work into three phases: i) negotiating the project particulars with the client; ii) conducting project work; and iii) project evaluation. This detailed analysis revealed how time pressures eliminated innovation in First’s client-based project work and suggested three implications for the management of innovation. Firstly, managers should try to avoid imposing excessive time pressures on their project teams. Secondly, they should ensure that there is space between projects to enable reflection. Thirdly, managers should ensure that project debriefs occur and that they cover potential innovations. |
topic |
consultancy innovation practice-based approach time |
url |
http://timreview.ca/sites/default/files/article_PDF/Winsor_TIMReview_August2012.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT blairwinsor managinginnovationundertimepressureapracticalperspective |
_version_ |
1725750692873764864 |