Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis

Abstract Background There are several types of tenodesis reconstruction designed for subtalar instability. However, no comprehensive comparison has been conducted among these procedures in terms of their correcting power so far. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xu Can, Li Mingqing, Wang Chenggong, Liu Hua
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-10-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03693-5
id doaj-4ee63f3057f34678980ba48b4dce9216
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ee63f3057f34678980ba48b4dce92162020-11-25T02:46:29ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-10-0121111210.1186/s12891-020-03693-5Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysisXu Can0Li Mingqing1Wang Chenggong2Liu Hua3Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South UniversityAbstract Background There are several types of tenodesis reconstruction designed for subtalar instability. However, no comprehensive comparison has been conducted among these procedures in terms of their correcting power so far. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of 5 representative procedures through finite element analysis. Methods Finite element models were established and validated based on one of our previous studies. The Pisani interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL) reconstruction, Schon cervical ligament (CL) reconstruction and Choisne calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL sectioned. The Schon triligamentous reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL, as well as the ATFL sectioned. The inversion and external/internal rotation were quantified at different ankle positions based on the rotational moment. Then, the stress in ligaments and reconstructed grafts and the contact characteristics of the subtalar joint under inversional stress test were calculated and compared accordingly. Results For single ligament reconstruction, the Choisne CFL reconstruction provided the greatest degree of correction for subtalar instability, followed by the Schon CL reconstruction and then the Pisani ITCL reconstruction. For triligamentous reconstruction, the Mann procedure outperformed the Schon procedure in alleviating the subtalar instability. Conclusion The finite element analysis showed that the Choisne CFL reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction provided the greatest degree of immediate postoperative subtalar stability. However, both procedures could not restore the biomechanical behaviors of the subtalar joint to normal. The long-term efficacy of these procedures warrants further investigation using a substantially larger sample of clinical cases.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03693-5Finite elementSubtalar instabilityTenodesis reconstructionBiomechanicalKinematic characteristics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xu Can
Li Mingqing
Wang Chenggong
Liu Hua
spellingShingle Xu Can
Li Mingqing
Wang Chenggong
Liu Hua
Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Finite element
Subtalar instability
Tenodesis reconstruction
Biomechanical
Kinematic characteristics
author_facet Xu Can
Li Mingqing
Wang Chenggong
Liu Hua
author_sort Xu Can
title Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_short Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_full Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
title_sort biomechanical comparison of tenodesis reconstruction for subtalar instability: a finite element analysis
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract Background There are several types of tenodesis reconstruction designed for subtalar instability. However, no comprehensive comparison has been conducted among these procedures in terms of their correcting power so far. The objective of this study is to evaluate the biomechanical behaviors of 5 representative procedures through finite element analysis. Methods Finite element models were established and validated based on one of our previous studies. The Pisani interosseous talocalcaneal ligament (ITCL) reconstruction, Schon cervical ligament (CL) reconstruction and Choisne calcaneofibular ligament (CFL) reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL sectioned. The Schon triligamentous reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction were compared on the model with the CFL, ITCL and CL, as well as the ATFL sectioned. The inversion and external/internal rotation were quantified at different ankle positions based on the rotational moment. Then, the stress in ligaments and reconstructed grafts and the contact characteristics of the subtalar joint under inversional stress test were calculated and compared accordingly. Results For single ligament reconstruction, the Choisne CFL reconstruction provided the greatest degree of correction for subtalar instability, followed by the Schon CL reconstruction and then the Pisani ITCL reconstruction. For triligamentous reconstruction, the Mann procedure outperformed the Schon procedure in alleviating the subtalar instability. Conclusion The finite element analysis showed that the Choisne CFL reconstruction and Mann triligamentous reconstruction provided the greatest degree of immediate postoperative subtalar stability. However, both procedures could not restore the biomechanical behaviors of the subtalar joint to normal. The long-term efficacy of these procedures warrants further investigation using a substantially larger sample of clinical cases.
topic Finite element
Subtalar instability
Tenodesis reconstruction
Biomechanical
Kinematic characteristics
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03693-5
work_keys_str_mv AT xucan biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis
AT limingqing biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis
AT wangchenggong biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis
AT liuhua biomechanicalcomparisonoftenodesisreconstructionforsubtalarinstabilityafiniteelementanalysis
_version_ 1724757914481065984