EVEN WITH TIME, CONFLICT ADAPTATION IS NOT MADE OF EXPECTANCIES

EVEN WITH TIME, CONFLICT ADAPTATION IS NOT MADE OF EXPECTANCIES

In conflict tasks, congruency effects are modulated by the sequence of preceding trials. This modulation has been interpreted as a strategic reconfiguration of cognitive control, depending on the amount of conflict encountered on the very last trial, and occurring unconditionally whenever there is t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Luis eJimenez, Amavia eMéndez
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-09-01
Series:	Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:	cognitive control Stroop task conflict adaptation reactive control expectancies sequential congruency
Online Access:	http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01042/full

Similar Items

Once Bitten, Twice Shy: On The Short-Lived Nature of Congruency Adaptation Effects
by: Wery P.M. van den Wildenberg, et al.
Published: (2012-07-01)

Attentional Reorientation and Inhibition Adjustment in a Verbal Stroop Task: A Lifespan Approach to Interference and Sequential Congruency Effect
by: Eric Ménétré, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Priming Emotional Salience Reveals the Role of Episodic Memory and Task Conflict in the Non-color Word Stroop Task
by: Chiao Wei Hsieh, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Congruency sequence effects are driven by previous-trial congruency, not previous-trial response conflict.
by: Daniel eWeissman, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01)

Conflict components of the Stroop effect and their control
by: Yulia eLevin, et al.
Published: (2014-05-01)

Proportion congruency effects: Instructions may be enough
by: Olga eEntel, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01)

Self-generated and Cue-induced Expectations: Differences and Interactions
by: Kemper, Maike
Published: (2020)

Task Conflict and Task Control: A Mini-Review
by: Ran Littman, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Going, going, gone: characterizing the time-course of congruency sequence effects
by: Tobias eEgner, et al.
Published: (2010-09-01)

Intermodal Priming of Cognitive Conflict? A Failed Replication of Mager et al. (2009)
by: Daniel Wiswede, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

What Klein’s semantic gradient does and does not really show: decomposing Stroop interference into task and informational conflict components
by: Yulia eLevin, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01)

Second language proficiency modulates conflict-monitoring in an oculomotor Stroop task: evidence from Hindi-English bilinguals.
by: Niharika eSingh, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)

The contribution of meaning to the detection of task conflict
by: Henik, A., et al.
Published: (2021)

Resolved but not Forgotten: Stroop Conflict Dredges Up the Past
by: Eliot eHazeltine, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

Editorial: Is Conflict Adaptation an Illusion?
by: James R Schmidt, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01)

High Cognitive Reserve is associated with a reduced age-related deficit in spatial conflict resolution.
by: Olga ePuccioni, et al.
Published: (2012-12-01)

The role of visual awareness for conflict adaptation in the masked priming task: Comparing block-wise adaptation with trial-by-trial adaptation
by: Kunihiro eHasegawa, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)

State Anxiety Impairs Proactive but Enhances Reactive Control
by: Youcai Yang, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Editorial: The Locus of the Stroop Effect
by: Benjamin A. Parris, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

On the influence of emotion on conflict processing
by: Philipp eKanske
Published: (2012-07-01)

Is Conflict Adaptation an Illusion?
Published: (2015)

Adaptation to Recent Conflict in the Classical Color-Word Stroop-Task Mainly Involves Facilitation of Processing of Task-Relevant Information
by: Sascha ePurmann, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

The heterogeneous world of congruency sequence effects: An update.
by: Wout eDuthoo, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

The emotional valence of a conflict: Implications from synesthesia
by: Amit ePerry, et al.
Published: (2013-12-01)

Task conflict in the Stroop task: When Stroop interference decreases as Stroop facilitation increases in a low task conflict context
by: Benjamin Andrew Parris
Published: (2014-10-01)

State anxiety impairs proactive but enhances reactive control
by: Larson, C.L, et al.
Published: (2018)

Sequential Congruency Effects in Monolingual and Bilingual Adults: A Failure to Replicate Grundy et al. (2017)
by: Samantha F. Goldsmith, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Conflict-Elicited Negative Evaluations of Neutral Stimuli: Testing Overt Responses and Stimulus-Frequency Differences as Critical Side Conditions
by: Florian Goller, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

How Do Children Deal With Conflict? A Developmental Study of Sequential Conflict Modulation
by: Silvan F. A. Smulders, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

Multiple Routes to Control in the Prime-Target Task: Congruence Sequence Effects Emerge Due to Modulation of Irrelevant Prime Activity and Utilization of Temporal Order Information
by: David Dignath, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

The role of contingency and correlation in the Stroop task
by: Hasshim, N., et al.
Published: (2021)

Cross-task congruency sequence effect without the contribution of multiple expectancy
by: Chae Eun Lim, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

The Effect of Script Similarity on Executive Control in Bilinguals
by: Emily L Coderre, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

Preserved Proactive Control in Ageing: A Stroop Study With Emotional Faces vs. Words
by: Natalie Berger, et al.
Published: (2019-09-01)

Analisis Perbedaan Pola Sinyal EEG Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin Yang Berbeda Saat Numerical Stroop Task
by: Riswandha Latu Dimas, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

Sequential Modulations in a Combined Horizontal and Vertical Simon Task: Is There ERP Evidence for Feature Integration Effects?
by: Katharina Hoppe, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

An fMRI Study of Response and Semantic Conflict in the Stroop Task
by: Benjamin A. Parris, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

Interference scores have inadequate concurrent and convergent validity: Should we stop using the flanker, Simon, and spatial Stroop tasks?
by: Kenneth R. Paap, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01)

When a “Replication” Is Not a Replication. Commentary: Sequential Congruency Effects in Monolingual and Bilingual Adults
by: John G. Grundy, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Reclaiming the Stroop Effect Back From Control to Input-Driven Attention and Perception
by: Daniel Algom, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_9m3r07c9hth96bejuu4haa2edk