The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative review

ABSTRACT Objective analyze how studies have approached the results obtained from the application of the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) based on Donabedian’s model of healthcare organization and delivery. Method CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched for papers published between 2003 and March...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joanie Lachance, Frédéric Douville, Clémence Dallaire, Katia Grillo Padilha, Maria Cecilia Gallani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade de São Paulo 2015-12-01
Series:Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000700147&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-4ed4593f2d554a96af242ec70601e9ad
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ed4593f2d554a96af242ec70601e9ad2020-11-24T23:09:53ZengUniversidade de São PauloRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP1980-220X2015-12-0149spe14715610.1590/S0080-623420150000700021S0080-62342015000700147The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative reviewJoanie LachanceFrédéric DouvilleClémence DallaireKatia Grillo PadilhaMaria Cecilia GallaniABSTRACT Objective analyze how studies have approached the results obtained from the application of the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) based on Donabedian’s model of healthcare organization and delivery. Method CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched for papers published between 2003 and March 2015. Results 36 articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and double-coded by three independent coders and analyzed based on the three elements of Donabedian’s health care quality framework: structure, process and outcome. The most frequently addressed, but not always tested, variables were those that fell into the structure category. Conclusion variables that fell into the process category were used less frequently. Beside NAS, the most frequently used variables in the outcome category were mortality and length of stay. However, no study used a quality framework for healthcare or NAS to evaluate costs, and it is recommended that further research should explore this approach.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000700147&lng=en&tlng=enCarga de TrabajoPersonal de EnfermeríaUnidades de Cuidados IntensivosCalidad de la Atención de SaludRevisión
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joanie Lachance
Frédéric Douville
Clémence Dallaire
Katia Grillo Padilha
Maria Cecilia Gallani
spellingShingle Joanie Lachance
Frédéric Douville
Clémence Dallaire
Katia Grillo Padilha
Maria Cecilia Gallani
The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative review
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
Carga de Trabajo
Personal de Enfermería
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
Calidad de la Atención de Salud
Revisión
author_facet Joanie Lachance
Frédéric Douville
Clémence Dallaire
Katia Grillo Padilha
Maria Cecilia Gallani
author_sort Joanie Lachance
title The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative review
title_short The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative review
title_full The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative review
title_fullStr The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative review
title_full_unstemmed The use of the Nursing Activities Score in clinical settings: an integrative review
title_sort use of the nursing activities score in clinical settings: an integrative review
publisher Universidade de São Paulo
series Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
issn 1980-220X
publishDate 2015-12-01
description ABSTRACT Objective analyze how studies have approached the results obtained from the application of the Nursing Activities Score (NAS) based on Donabedian’s model of healthcare organization and delivery. Method CINAHL and PubMed databases were searched for papers published between 2003 and March 2015. Results 36 articles that met the inclusion criteria were reviewed and double-coded by three independent coders and analyzed based on the three elements of Donabedian’s health care quality framework: structure, process and outcome. The most frequently addressed, but not always tested, variables were those that fell into the structure category. Conclusion variables that fell into the process category were used less frequently. Beside NAS, the most frequently used variables in the outcome category were mortality and length of stay. However, no study used a quality framework for healthcare or NAS to evaluate costs, and it is recommended that further research should explore this approach.
topic Carga de Trabajo
Personal de Enfermería
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
Calidad de la Atención de Salud
Revisión
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080-62342015000700147&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT joanielachance theuseofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT fredericdouville theuseofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT clemencedallaire theuseofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT katiagrillopadilha theuseofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT mariaceciliagallani theuseofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT joanielachance useofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT fredericdouville useofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT clemencedallaire useofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT katiagrillopadilha useofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
AT mariaceciliagallani useofthenursingactivitiesscoreinclinicalsettingsanintegrativereview
_version_ 1725609257643016192