Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials

Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divide...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Camilla Lopes Cerqueira, Roniel Kappler, Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti, Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Estadual de Campinas 2019-11-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657257
id doaj-4ec405dac1124c46b92322a34e30b26f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ec405dac1124c46b92322a34e30b26f2021-07-14T18:46:02ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252019-11-011810.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657257Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materialsCamilla Lopes Cerqueira0Roniel Kappler1Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti2Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima3Federal University of BahiaFederal University of BahiaFederal University of BahiaFederal University of Bahia Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divided into four groups: Irreversible hydrocolloid
(IH), laboratory silicone (LS), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS). After the impression procedures, each matrix was loaded with the provisional prosthetic materials, Alike, Duralay, Protemp 4, and Structur 3 (n = 12). Marginal discrepancy was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×45 magnification. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program, and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines at the metal die were measured vertically. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=.05). Results: the acrylic resins had higher values ​​of marginal discrepancy compared to the bisacrylic resins. A statistically significant difference was found between all impression materials, and the irreversible hydrocolloid presented higher values of discrepancy (303.28–613.31 μm), whereas addition silicone had the lowest (48.61–190.06 μm). Conclusions: the bisacrylic resins had a better marginal adaptation compared to the acrylic resins. The addition silicone promoted a better marginal adaptation of the provisional prosthetic materials tested, followed by condensation silicone, laboratory silicone, and irreversible hydrocolloid. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657257Dental marginal adaptationDental restoration, temporaryDental impression materials.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Camilla Lopes Cerqueira
Roniel Kappler
Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti
Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima
spellingShingle Camilla Lopes Cerqueira
Roniel Kappler
Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti
Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima
Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
Dental marginal adaptation
Dental restoration, temporary
Dental impression materials.
author_facet Camilla Lopes Cerqueira
Roniel Kappler
Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti
Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima
author_sort Camilla Lopes Cerqueira
title Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
title_short Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
title_full Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
title_fullStr Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
title_full_unstemmed Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
title_sort marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
publisher Universidade Estadual de Campinas
series Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences
issn 1677-3225
publishDate 2019-11-01
description Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divided into four groups: Irreversible hydrocolloid
(IH), laboratory silicone (LS), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS). After the impression procedures, each matrix was loaded with the provisional prosthetic materials, Alike, Duralay, Protemp 4, and Structur 3 (n = 12). Marginal discrepancy was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×45 magnification. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program, and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines at the metal die were measured vertically. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=.05). Results: the acrylic resins had higher values ​​of marginal discrepancy compared to the bisacrylic resins. A statistically significant difference was found between all impression materials, and the irreversible hydrocolloid presented higher values of discrepancy (303.28–613.31 μm), whereas addition silicone had the lowest (48.61–190.06 μm). Conclusions: the bisacrylic resins had a better marginal adaptation compared to the acrylic resins. The addition silicone promoted a better marginal adaptation of the provisional prosthetic materials tested, followed by condensation silicone, laboratory silicone, and irreversible hydrocolloid.
topic Dental marginal adaptation
Dental restoration, temporary
Dental impression materials.
url https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657257
work_keys_str_mv AT camillalopescerqueira marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials
AT ronielkappler marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials
AT andreaaraujonobregacavalcanti marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials
AT emilenamariacastorxistolima marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials
_version_ 1721302461432463360