Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials
Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divide...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2019-11-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657257 |
id |
doaj-4ec405dac1124c46b92322a34e30b26f |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4ec405dac1124c46b92322a34e30b26f2021-07-14T18:46:02ZengUniversidade Estadual de CampinasBrazilian Journal of Oral Sciences1677-32252019-11-011810.20396/bjos.v18i0.8657257Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materialsCamilla Lopes Cerqueira0Roniel Kappler1Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti2Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima3Federal University of BahiaFederal University of BahiaFederal University of BahiaFederal University of Bahia Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divided into four groups: Irreversible hydrocolloid
(IH), laboratory silicone (LS), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS). After the impression procedures, each matrix was loaded with the provisional prosthetic materials, Alike, Duralay, Protemp 4, and Structur 3 (n = 12). Marginal discrepancy was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×45 magnification. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program, and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines at the metal die were measured vertically. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=.05). Results: the acrylic resins had higher values of marginal discrepancy compared to the bisacrylic resins. A statistically significant difference was found between all impression materials, and the irreversible hydrocolloid presented higher values of discrepancy (303.28–613.31 μm), whereas addition silicone had the lowest (48.61–190.06 μm). Conclusions: the bisacrylic resins had a better marginal adaptation compared to the acrylic resins. The addition silicone promoted a better marginal adaptation of the provisional prosthetic materials tested, followed by condensation silicone, laboratory silicone, and irreversible hydrocolloid. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657257Dental marginal adaptationDental restoration, temporaryDental impression materials. |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Camilla Lopes Cerqueira Roniel Kappler Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima |
spellingShingle |
Camilla Lopes Cerqueira Roniel Kappler Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences Dental marginal adaptation Dental restoration, temporary Dental impression materials. |
author_facet |
Camilla Lopes Cerqueira Roniel Kappler Andrea Araújo Nobrega Cavalcanti Emilena Maria Castor Xisto Lima |
author_sort |
Camilla Lopes Cerqueira |
title |
Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials |
title_short |
Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials |
title_full |
Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials |
title_fullStr |
Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials |
title_full_unstemmed |
Marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials |
title_sort |
marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials |
publisher |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Oral Sciences |
issn |
1677-3225 |
publishDate |
2019-11-01 |
description |
Aim: To evaluate the marginal adaptation of provisional crowns made of acrylic and bisacrylic resins using different impression materials. Methods: a metal die and a matrix applied through a direct technique were used to fabricate the specimens. The impression materials used as a matrix were divided into four groups: Irreversible hydrocolloid
(IH), laboratory silicone (LS), condensation silicone (CS), and addition silicone (AS). After the impression procedures, each matrix was loaded with the provisional prosthetic materials, Alike, Duralay, Protemp 4, and Structur 3 (n = 12). Marginal discrepancy was evaluated using a stereomicroscope at ×45 magnification. The images obtained were transferred to the Corel Draw X7 program, and the distances from the cervical margins of the specimen to the reference lines at the metal die were measured vertically. The data were analyzed by using 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (α=.05). Results: the acrylic resins had higher values of marginal discrepancy compared to the bisacrylic resins. A statistically significant difference was found between all impression materials, and the irreversible hydrocolloid presented higher values of discrepancy (303.28–613.31 μm), whereas addition silicone had the lowest (48.61–190.06 μm). Conclusions: the bisacrylic resins had a better marginal adaptation compared to the acrylic resins. The addition silicone promoted a better marginal adaptation of the provisional prosthetic materials tested, followed by condensation silicone, laboratory silicone, and irreversible hydrocolloid.
|
topic |
Dental marginal adaptation Dental restoration, temporary Dental impression materials. |
url |
https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/bjos/article/view/8657257 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT camillalopescerqueira marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials AT ronielkappler marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials AT andreaaraujonobregacavalcanti marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials AT emilenamariacastorxistolima marginaladaptationofprovisionalcrownsmadeofacrylicandbisacrylicresinsusingdifferentimpressionmaterials |
_version_ |
1721302461432463360 |