Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review
A systematic review of the literature concerning surgical engineering in cranio-maxillofacial surgery was performed. APubMed search yielded 1721 papers published between 1999 and 2011. Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 1428 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts. Atotal...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Healthcare Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.3.1.53 |
id |
doaj-4ebdcfe539a245e9bb1acc49eb2c853d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4ebdcfe539a245e9bb1acc49eb2c853d2020-11-24T22:30:41ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Healthcare Engineering2040-22952012-01-0131538610.1260/2040-2295.3.1.53Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature ReviewRaphael Olszewski0Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Research Lab, Department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Cliniques universitaires saint Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, BelgiumA systematic review of the literature concerning surgical engineering in cranio-maxillofacial surgery was performed. APubMed search yielded 1721 papers published between 1999 and 2011. Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 1428 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts. Atotal of 292 articles were finally selected covering the following topics: finite element analysis (n = 18), computer-assisted surgery (n = 111), rapid prototyping models (n = 41), preoperative training simulators (n = 4), surgical guides (n = 23), image-guided navigation (n = 58), augmented reality (n = 2), video tracking (n = 1), distraction osteogenesis (n = 19), robotics (n = 8), and minimal invasive surgery (n = 7). The results show that surgical engineering plays a pivotal role in the development and improvement of cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Some technologies, such as computer-assisted surgery, image-guided navigation, and three-dimensional rapid prototyping models, have reached maturity and allow for multiple clinical applications, while augmented reality, robotics, and endoscopy still need to be improved.http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.3.1.53 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Raphael Olszewski |
spellingShingle |
Raphael Olszewski Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review Journal of Healthcare Engineering |
author_facet |
Raphael Olszewski |
author_sort |
Raphael Olszewski |
title |
Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review |
title_short |
Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review |
title_full |
Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review |
title_fullStr |
Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Surgical Engineering in Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery: A Literature Review |
title_sort |
surgical engineering in cranio-maxillofacial surgery: a literature review |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Healthcare Engineering |
issn |
2040-2295 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
A systematic review of the literature concerning surgical engineering in cranio-maxillofacial surgery was performed. APubMed search yielded 1721 papers published between 1999 and 2011. Based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 1428 articles were excluded after review of titles and abstracts. Atotal of 292 articles were finally selected covering the following topics: finite element analysis (n = 18), computer-assisted surgery (n = 111), rapid prototyping models (n = 41), preoperative training simulators (n = 4), surgical guides (n = 23), image-guided navigation (n = 58), augmented reality (n = 2), video tracking (n = 1), distraction osteogenesis (n = 19), robotics (n = 8), and minimal invasive surgery (n = 7). The results show that surgical engineering plays a pivotal role in the development and improvement of cranio-maxillofacial surgery. Some technologies, such as computer-assisted surgery, image-guided navigation, and three-dimensional rapid prototyping models, have reached maturity and allow for multiple clinical applications, while augmented reality, robotics, and endoscopy still need to be improved. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.3.1.53 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT raphaelolszewski surgicalengineeringincraniomaxillofacialsurgeryaliteraturereview |
_version_ |
1725739868865167360 |