Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto Bolaño

Using some of the notions from Jacques Derrida, and in disagreement with a certain fraction of the critics of Bolaño, this essay goes over the critical and emotional path taken by Manuel Espinoza, Piero Morini, Liz Norton and Jean-Claude Pelletier that was once seen as only «cartoons» of the Europea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Felipe Adrián Ríos Baeza
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad del Valle 2019-12-01
Series:Poligramas
Subjects:
Online Access:https://poligramas.univalle.edu.co/index.php/poligramas/article/view/8854/12311
id doaj-4eb67d36d5964e1b9003c6d840a17c3f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4eb67d36d5964e1b9003c6d840a17c3f2021-02-11T21:19:09ZspaUniversidad del VallePoligramas0120-41302590-92072019-12-0149173910.25100/poligramas.v0i49.8854Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto BolañoFelipe Adrián Ríos Baeza0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9449-4651University of AnáhuacUsing some of the notions from Jacques Derrida, and in disagreement with a certain fraction of the critics of Bolaño, this essay goes over the critical and emotional path taken by Manuel Espinoza, Piero Morini, Liz Norton and Jean-Claude Pelletier that was once seen as only «cartoons» of the European cultural evaluation but that, in reality, for the complete novel 2666 by Roberto Bolaño, it represents a much more complex profile of academics and subjects. In fact, the ambiguous and problematic notion of «friendship» is what, on one side, will open gaps between the public life of the Spanish, Italian, French and English characters (their institutional ambitions) and their private lives (their friendhips and love lives); and on the other side, will cause what we’ll call the «eclipsing» of some circumstances that, at first, seemed like determinant for the concatenation of the argument of «The critics part» but will later function only to deconstruct it as a simple parody. The relationship between Norton and Morini, and Pelletier’s and Espinoza’s search for Benno von Archimboldi in the Sonora desert will not only reconfigure the focus on the novel???s characters, but also of the possible real reader, who will see a transgression of any possibilities to make any sense of 2666 if he does not go back to a troubling image: there is a last text (the novels of Archimboldi) and a last reader capable of making sense of it (Pelletier); however, the entrance to both fields is shut down.https://poligramas.univalle.edu.co/index.php/poligramas/article/view/8854/12311roberto bolaño2666jacques derridadeconstructionpolitics of friendship
collection DOAJ
language Spanish
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Felipe Adrián Ríos Baeza
spellingShingle Felipe Adrián Ríos Baeza
Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto Bolaño
Poligramas
roberto bolaño
2666
jacques derrida
deconstruction
politics of friendship
author_facet Felipe Adrián Ríos Baeza
author_sort Felipe Adrián Ríos Baeza
title Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto Bolaño
title_short Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto Bolaño
title_full Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto Bolaño
title_fullStr Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto Bolaño
title_full_unstemmed Eclipsing: New «politics of friendship» in 2666, from Roberto Bolaño
title_sort eclipsing: new «politics of friendship» in 2666, from roberto bolaño
publisher Universidad del Valle
series Poligramas
issn 0120-4130
2590-9207
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Using some of the notions from Jacques Derrida, and in disagreement with a certain fraction of the critics of Bolaño, this essay goes over the critical and emotional path taken by Manuel Espinoza, Piero Morini, Liz Norton and Jean-Claude Pelletier that was once seen as only «cartoons» of the European cultural evaluation but that, in reality, for the complete novel 2666 by Roberto Bolaño, it represents a much more complex profile of academics and subjects. In fact, the ambiguous and problematic notion of «friendship» is what, on one side, will open gaps between the public life of the Spanish, Italian, French and English characters (their institutional ambitions) and their private lives (their friendhips and love lives); and on the other side, will cause what we’ll call the «eclipsing» of some circumstances that, at first, seemed like determinant for the concatenation of the argument of «The critics part» but will later function only to deconstruct it as a simple parody. The relationship between Norton and Morini, and Pelletier’s and Espinoza’s search for Benno von Archimboldi in the Sonora desert will not only reconfigure the focus on the novel???s characters, but also of the possible real reader, who will see a transgression of any possibilities to make any sense of 2666 if he does not go back to a troubling image: there is a last text (the novels of Archimboldi) and a last reader capable of making sense of it (Pelletier); however, the entrance to both fields is shut down.
topic roberto bolaño
2666
jacques derrida
deconstruction
politics of friendship
url https://poligramas.univalle.edu.co/index.php/poligramas/article/view/8854/12311
work_keys_str_mv AT felipeadrianriosbaeza eclipsingnewpoliticsoffriendshipin2666fromrobertobolano
_version_ 1724274073468403712