Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and Recipient

When the cost of altruism is low, individuals are more likely to help non-kin (i.e., friends and romantic partners) than kin. This trend is thought to reflect the fact that people tend to be emotionally closer with friends and romantic partners than kin. However, as the cost of altruism increases, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carey J. Fitzgerald, Matthew C. Thompson, Mitchell B. Whitaker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2010-07-01
Series:Evolutionary Psychology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800312
id doaj-4eb27de5772a476aaea91a2f8e07bc4c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4eb27de5772a476aaea91a2f8e07bc4c2020-11-25T03:19:58ZengSAGE PublishingEvolutionary Psychology1474-70492010-07-01810.1177/14747049100080031210.1177_147470491000800312Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and RecipientCarey J. FitzgeraldMatthew C. ThompsonMitchell B. WhitakerWhen the cost of altruism is low, individuals are more likely to help non-kin (i.e., friends and romantic partners) than kin. This trend is thought to reflect the fact that people tend to be emotionally closer with friends and romantic partners than kin. However, as the cost of altruism increases, altruistic preference shifts to kin. The present study highlights this phenomenon by examining altruism between siblings, romantic partners, romantic partners who have biological children together, and romantic partners who have adopted children together. Participants ( n = 203) completed a questionnaire about altruism in low-, medium-, and high-cost situations. Participants gave more low-cost help to their romantic partners (regardless of whether they had a child together) than their siblings. More medium-cost help was given to romantic partners who had a child (biological and adopted) than siblings and romantic partners without children. In the high-cost condition, the estimated altruistic tendencies were stronger toward siblings and romantic partners who have a biological child than toward romantic partners with no children and partners with adopted children. Participants also believed they were more altruistic than their siblings and romantic partners.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800312
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carey J. Fitzgerald
Matthew C. Thompson
Mitchell B. Whitaker
spellingShingle Carey J. Fitzgerald
Matthew C. Thompson
Mitchell B. Whitaker
Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and Recipient
Evolutionary Psychology
author_facet Carey J. Fitzgerald
Matthew C. Thompson
Mitchell B. Whitaker
author_sort Carey J. Fitzgerald
title Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and Recipient
title_short Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and Recipient
title_full Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and Recipient
title_fullStr Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and Recipient
title_full_unstemmed Altruism between Romantic Partners: Biological Offspring as a Genetic Bridge between Altruist and Recipient
title_sort altruism between romantic partners: biological offspring as a genetic bridge between altruist and recipient
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Evolutionary Psychology
issn 1474-7049
publishDate 2010-07-01
description When the cost of altruism is low, individuals are more likely to help non-kin (i.e., friends and romantic partners) than kin. This trend is thought to reflect the fact that people tend to be emotionally closer with friends and romantic partners than kin. However, as the cost of altruism increases, altruistic preference shifts to kin. The present study highlights this phenomenon by examining altruism between siblings, romantic partners, romantic partners who have biological children together, and romantic partners who have adopted children together. Participants ( n = 203) completed a questionnaire about altruism in low-, medium-, and high-cost situations. Participants gave more low-cost help to their romantic partners (regardless of whether they had a child together) than their siblings. More medium-cost help was given to romantic partners who had a child (biological and adopted) than siblings and romantic partners without children. In the high-cost condition, the estimated altruistic tendencies were stronger toward siblings and romantic partners who have a biological child than toward romantic partners with no children and partners with adopted children. Participants also believed they were more altruistic than their siblings and romantic partners.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800312
work_keys_str_mv AT careyjfitzgerald altruismbetweenromanticpartnersbiologicaloffspringasageneticbridgebetweenaltruistandrecipient
AT matthewcthompson altruismbetweenromanticpartnersbiologicaloffspringasageneticbridgebetweenaltruistandrecipient
AT mitchellbwhitaker altruismbetweenromanticpartnersbiologicaloffspringasageneticbridgebetweenaltruistandrecipient
_version_ 1724619915308040192