Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science

In recent years, the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in pediatric populations has increased considerably, especially for chronic conditions such as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and cystic fibrosis in which pain may be a significant problem. Despite the growing popularity of CAM...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennie C. I. Tsao, Lonnie K. Zeltzer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2005-01-01
Series:Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neh092
id doaj-4eac852c4a0e4a518e2fea481f61375e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4eac852c4a0e4a518e2fea481f61375e2020-11-24T22:09:15ZengHindawi LimitedEvidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine1741-427X1741-42882005-01-012214915910.1093/ecam/neh092Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-scienceJennie C. I. Tsao0Lonnie K. Zeltzer1Pediatric Pain Program, Departments of Pediatrics, Anesthesiology, Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USAPediatric Pain Program, Departments of Pediatrics, Anesthesiology, Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USAIn recent years, the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in pediatric populations has increased considerably, especially for chronic conditions such as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and cystic fibrosis in which pain may be a significant problem. Despite the growing popularity of CAM approaches for pediatric pain, questions regarding the efficacy of these interventions remain. This review critically evaluates the existing empirical evidence for the efficacy of CAM interventions for pain symptoms in children. CAM modalities that possess a published literature, including controlled trials and/or multiple baseline studies, that focused on either chronic or acute, procedural pain were included in this review. The efficacy of the CAM interventions was evaluated according to the framework developed by the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 12 Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. According to these criteria, only one CAM approach reviewed herein (self-hypnosis/guided imagery/relaxation for recurrent pediatric headache) qualified as an empirically supported therapy (EST), although many may be considered possibly efficacious or promising treatments for pediatric pain. Several methodological limitations of the existing literature on CAM interventions for pain problems in children are highlighted and future avenues for research are outlined.http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neh092
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennie C. I. Tsao
Lonnie K. Zeltzer
spellingShingle Jennie C. I. Tsao
Lonnie K. Zeltzer
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
author_facet Jennie C. I. Tsao
Lonnie K. Zeltzer
author_sort Jennie C. I. Tsao
title Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science
title_short Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science
title_full Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science
title_fullStr Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science
title_full_unstemmed Complementary and Alternative Medicine Approaches for Pediatric Pain: A Review of the State-of-the-science
title_sort complementary and alternative medicine approaches for pediatric pain: a review of the state-of-the-science
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
issn 1741-427X
1741-4288
publishDate 2005-01-01
description In recent years, the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in pediatric populations has increased considerably, especially for chronic conditions such as cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and cystic fibrosis in which pain may be a significant problem. Despite the growing popularity of CAM approaches for pediatric pain, questions regarding the efficacy of these interventions remain. This review critically evaluates the existing empirical evidence for the efficacy of CAM interventions for pain symptoms in children. CAM modalities that possess a published literature, including controlled trials and/or multiple baseline studies, that focused on either chronic or acute, procedural pain were included in this review. The efficacy of the CAM interventions was evaluated according to the framework developed by the American Psychological Association (APA) Division 12 Task Force on Promotion and Dissemination of Psychological Procedures. According to these criteria, only one CAM approach reviewed herein (self-hypnosis/guided imagery/relaxation for recurrent pediatric headache) qualified as an empirically supported therapy (EST), although many may be considered possibly efficacious or promising treatments for pediatric pain. Several methodological limitations of the existing literature on CAM interventions for pain problems in children are highlighted and future avenues for research are outlined.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ecam/neh092
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniecitsao complementaryandalternativemedicineapproachesforpediatricpainareviewofthestateofthescience
AT lonniekzeltzer complementaryandalternativemedicineapproachesforpediatricpainareviewofthestateofthescience
_version_ 1725812810977378304