Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections
Abstract Background Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x |
id |
doaj-4e99ab74c8d640d7978cbfc2c74962db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e99ab74c8d640d7978cbfc2c74962db2021-05-02T11:29:48ZengBMCBMC Medicine1741-70152021-04-0119111010.1186/s12916-021-01982-xEstimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infectionsJoel Hellewell0Timothy W. Russell1The SAFER Investigators and Field Study Team2The Crick COVID-19 Consortium3CMMID COVID-19 working group4Rupert Beale5Gavin Kelly6Catherine Houlihan7Eleni Nastouli8Adam J. Kucharski9Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineDepartment of Clinical Virology, University College London HospitalsCell Biology of Infection Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute; Division of Medicine, UCLCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineCell Biology of Infection Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute; Division of Medicine, UCLBioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick InstituteBioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick InstituteBioinformatics and Biostatistics, The Francis Crick InstituteCentre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineAbstract Background Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, the probability of detecting an infection will vary throughout the course of an infection. The effectiveness of routine asymptomatic testing will therefore depend on testing frequency and how PCR detection varies over time. Methods We fitted a Bayesian statistical model to a dataset of twice weekly PCR tests of UK healthcare workers performed by self-administered nasopharyngeal swab, regardless of symptoms. We jointly estimated times of infection and the probability of a positive PCR test over time following infection; we then compared asymptomatic testing strategies by calculating the probability that a symptomatic infection is detected before symptom onset and the probability that an asymptomatic infection is detected within 7 days of infection. Results We estimated that the probability that the PCR test detected infection peaked at 77% (54–88%) 4 days after infection, decreasing to 50% (38–65%) by 10 days after infection. Our results suggest a substantially higher probability of detecting infections 1–3 days after infection than previously published estimates. We estimated that testing every other day would detect 57% (33–76%) of symptomatic cases prior to onset and 94% (75–99%) of asymptomatic cases within 7 days if test results were returned within a day. Conclusions Our results suggest that routine asymptomatic testing can enable detection of a high proportion of infected individuals early in their infection, provided that the testing is frequent and the time from testing to notification of results is sufficiently fast.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01982-xTest sensitivityPCR testingCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Healthcare workersPresymptomatic infections |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joel Hellewell Timothy W. Russell The SAFER Investigators and Field Study Team The Crick COVID-19 Consortium CMMID COVID-19 working group Rupert Beale Gavin Kelly Catherine Houlihan Eleni Nastouli Adam J. Kucharski |
spellingShingle |
Joel Hellewell Timothy W. Russell The SAFER Investigators and Field Study Team The Crick COVID-19 Consortium CMMID COVID-19 working group Rupert Beale Gavin Kelly Catherine Houlihan Eleni Nastouli Adam J. Kucharski Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections BMC Medicine Test sensitivity PCR testing COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Healthcare workers Presymptomatic infections |
author_facet |
Joel Hellewell Timothy W. Russell The SAFER Investigators and Field Study Team The Crick COVID-19 Consortium CMMID COVID-19 working group Rupert Beale Gavin Kelly Catherine Houlihan Eleni Nastouli Adam J. Kucharski |
author_sort |
Joel Hellewell |
title |
Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_short |
Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_full |
Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_fullStr |
Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_full_unstemmed |
Estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic PCR testing at different frequencies for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 infections |
title_sort |
estimating the effectiveness of routine asymptomatic pcr testing at different frequencies for the detection of sars-cov-2 infections |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medicine |
issn |
1741-7015 |
publishDate |
2021-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Routine asymptomatic testing using RT-PCR of people who interact with vulnerable populations, such as medical staff in hospitals or care workers in care homes, has been employed to help prevent outbreaks among vulnerable populations. Although the peak sensitivity of RT-PCR can be high, the probability of detecting an infection will vary throughout the course of an infection. The effectiveness of routine asymptomatic testing will therefore depend on testing frequency and how PCR detection varies over time. Methods We fitted a Bayesian statistical model to a dataset of twice weekly PCR tests of UK healthcare workers performed by self-administered nasopharyngeal swab, regardless of symptoms. We jointly estimated times of infection and the probability of a positive PCR test over time following infection; we then compared asymptomatic testing strategies by calculating the probability that a symptomatic infection is detected before symptom onset and the probability that an asymptomatic infection is detected within 7 days of infection. Results We estimated that the probability that the PCR test detected infection peaked at 77% (54–88%) 4 days after infection, decreasing to 50% (38–65%) by 10 days after infection. Our results suggest a substantially higher probability of detecting infections 1–3 days after infection than previously published estimates. We estimated that testing every other day would detect 57% (33–76%) of symptomatic cases prior to onset and 94% (75–99%) of asymptomatic cases within 7 days if test results were returned within a day. Conclusions Our results suggest that routine asymptomatic testing can enable detection of a high proportion of infected individuals early in their infection, provided that the testing is frequent and the time from testing to notification of results is sufficiently fast. |
topic |
Test sensitivity PCR testing COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 Healthcare workers Presymptomatic infections |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-01982-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT joelhellewell estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT timothywrussell estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT thesaferinvestigatorsandfieldstudyteam estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT thecrickcovid19consortium estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT cmmidcovid19workinggroup estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT rupertbeale estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT gavinkelly estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT catherinehoulihan estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT eleninastouli estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections AT adamjkucharski estimatingtheeffectivenessofroutineasymptomaticpcrtestingatdifferentfrequenciesforthedetectionofsarscov2infections |
_version_ |
1721492139532091392 |