The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular Culture
This article starts from the observation that popular culture resides in a contradictory space. On the one hand it seems to be thriving, in that the range of media objects that were previously studied under the rubric of popular culture has certainly expanded. Yet, cultural studies scholars rarely s...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cogitatio
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Media and Communication |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4218 |
id |
doaj-4e8ac9ae80db48d3a3540fd77f7bea90 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e8ac9ae80db48d3a3540fd77f7bea902021-09-13T10:18:47ZengCogitatioMedia and Communication2183-24392021-09-019322823810.17645/mac.v9i3.42182136The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular CultureJoke Hermes0Jan Teurlings1Research Group Creative Business, Inholland University, The NetherlandsDepartment of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, The NetherlandsThis article starts from the observation that popular culture resides in a contradictory space. On the one hand it seems to be thriving, in that the range of media objects that were previously studied under the rubric of popular culture has certainly expanded. Yet, cultural studies scholars rarely study these media objects as popular culture. Instead, concerns about immaterial labor, about the manipulation of voting behavior and public opinion, about filter bubbles and societal polarization, and about populist authoritarianism, determine the dominant frames with which the contemporary media environment is approached. This article aims to trace how this change has come to pass over the last 50 years. It argues that changes in the media environment are important, but also that cultural studies as an institutionalizing interdisciplinary project has changed. It identifies “the moment of popular culture” as a relatively short-lived but epoch-defining moment in cultural studies. This moment was subsequently displaced by a set of related yet different theoretical problematics that gradually moved the study of popular culture away from the popular. These displacements are: the hollowing out of the notion of the popular, as signaled early on by Meaghan Morris’ article “The Banality of Cultural Studies” in 1988; the institutionalization of cultural studies; the rise of the governmentality approach and a growing engagement with affect theory.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4218affect theorybanalitycultural studiesfoucaultgovernmentalitymedia environmentpopular culturethe popular |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Joke Hermes Jan Teurlings |
spellingShingle |
Joke Hermes Jan Teurlings The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular Culture Media and Communication affect theory banality cultural studies foucault governmentality media environment popular culture the popular |
author_facet |
Joke Hermes Jan Teurlings |
author_sort |
Joke Hermes |
title |
The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular Culture |
title_short |
The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular Culture |
title_full |
The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular Culture |
title_fullStr |
The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular Culture |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Loss of the Popular: Reconstructing Fifty Years of Studying Popular Culture |
title_sort |
loss of the popular: reconstructing fifty years of studying popular culture |
publisher |
Cogitatio |
series |
Media and Communication |
issn |
2183-2439 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
This article starts from the observation that popular culture resides in a contradictory space. On the one hand it seems to be thriving, in that the range of media objects that were previously studied under the rubric of popular culture has certainly expanded. Yet, cultural studies scholars rarely study these media objects as popular culture. Instead, concerns about immaterial labor, about the manipulation of voting behavior and public opinion, about filter bubbles and societal polarization, and about populist authoritarianism, determine the dominant frames with which the contemporary media environment is approached. This article aims to trace how this change has come to pass over the last 50 years. It argues that changes in the media environment are important, but also that cultural studies as an institutionalizing interdisciplinary project has changed. It identifies “the moment of popular culture” as a relatively short-lived but epoch-defining moment in cultural studies. This moment was subsequently displaced by a set of related yet different theoretical problematics that gradually moved the study of popular culture away from the popular. These displacements are: the hollowing out of the notion of the popular, as signaled early on by Meaghan Morris’ article “The Banality of Cultural Studies” in 1988; the institutionalization of cultural studies; the rise of the governmentality approach and a growing engagement with affect theory. |
topic |
affect theory banality cultural studies foucault governmentality media environment popular culture the popular |
url |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/4218 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jokehermes thelossofthepopularreconstructingfiftyyearsofstudyingpopularculture AT janteurlings thelossofthepopularreconstructingfiftyyearsofstudyingpopularculture AT jokehermes lossofthepopularreconstructingfiftyyearsofstudyingpopularculture AT janteurlings lossofthepopularreconstructingfiftyyearsofstudyingpopularculture |
_version_ |
1717381019953266688 |