Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update
Abstract The criteria and candidacy for pediatric cochlear implantation (CI) has significantly transformed over the past few decades and continues to evolve with technological advancements, and recognition of benefit in more diverse populations. Prolonged auditory deprivation among patients with pro...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.574 |
id |
doaj-4e88ed332f5d49da96266356716883af |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e88ed332f5d49da96266356716883af2021-06-24T11:31:55ZengWileyLaryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology2378-80382021-06-016351252110.1002/lio2.574Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An updateAkash N. Naik0Varun V. Varadarajan1Prashant S. Malhotra2Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USADepartment of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery The Ohio State University Columbus Ohio USADivision of Pediatric Otolaryngology Nationwide Children's Hospital Columbus Ohio USAAbstract The criteria and candidacy for pediatric cochlear implantation (CI) has significantly transformed over the past few decades and continues to evolve with technological advancements, and recognition of benefit in more diverse populations. Prolonged auditory deprivation among patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss has been shown to cause widespread degeneration in the central auditory system. Thus, there is increasing evidence advocating for earlier implantation within a critical neuroplastic window. However, there is a lack of consensus on this optimal age of implantation. Historically, there were concerns regarding surgical feasibility and safety, anesthesia risk, and logistical considerations in very young infants <12 months. Recent literature has investigated surgical safety and anesthesia risk as well speech and language outcomes with early implantation, resulting in the long‐awaited reduction in approved age by the FDA (<9 months for certain devices). This article reviews logistical considerations, surgical safety, anesthesia risk, and language developmental outcomes associated with early CI (<12 months).https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.574anesthesia riskinfantlanguage and speech developmentpediatric cochlear implantationsurgical safety |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Akash N. Naik Varun V. Varadarajan Prashant S. Malhotra |
spellingShingle |
Akash N. Naik Varun V. Varadarajan Prashant S. Malhotra Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology anesthesia risk infant language and speech development pediatric cochlear implantation surgical safety |
author_facet |
Akash N. Naik Varun V. Varadarajan Prashant S. Malhotra |
author_sort |
Akash N. Naik |
title |
Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update |
title_short |
Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update |
title_full |
Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update |
title_fullStr |
Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update |
title_full_unstemmed |
Early pediatric Cochlear implantation: An update |
title_sort |
early pediatric cochlear implantation: an update |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology |
issn |
2378-8038 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
Abstract The criteria and candidacy for pediatric cochlear implantation (CI) has significantly transformed over the past few decades and continues to evolve with technological advancements, and recognition of benefit in more diverse populations. Prolonged auditory deprivation among patients with profound sensorineural hearing loss has been shown to cause widespread degeneration in the central auditory system. Thus, there is increasing evidence advocating for earlier implantation within a critical neuroplastic window. However, there is a lack of consensus on this optimal age of implantation. Historically, there were concerns regarding surgical feasibility and safety, anesthesia risk, and logistical considerations in very young infants <12 months. Recent literature has investigated surgical safety and anesthesia risk as well speech and language outcomes with early implantation, resulting in the long‐awaited reduction in approved age by the FDA (<9 months for certain devices). This article reviews logistical considerations, surgical safety, anesthesia risk, and language developmental outcomes associated with early CI (<12 months). |
topic |
anesthesia risk infant language and speech development pediatric cochlear implantation surgical safety |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.574 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT akashnnaik earlypediatriccochlearimplantationanupdate AT varunvvaradarajan earlypediatriccochlearimplantationanupdate AT prashantsmalhotra earlypediatriccochlearimplantationanupdate |
_version_ |
1721361303373611008 |