WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS
In the last two decades, many forest product firms in the U.S. either divested their timberlands to timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and conservation organizations or converted their corporate structures from C corporations to real estate investment trusts (REITs). All landowners s...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics
2016-07-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.foodandagriculturejournal.com/vol4.no3.pp33.pdf |
id |
doaj-4e82912060bb480f81bd481caa552d87 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e82912060bb480f81bd481caa552d872020-11-24T23:02:34ZengInternational Journal of Food and Agricultural EconomicsInternational Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics2147-89882016-07-01433348WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETSMohammad Mahfuzur Rahman 0Ian Alexander Munn1Changyou Sun 2niversity of Chittagong, BangladeshMississippi State University, USAMississippi State University, USAIn the last two decades, many forest product firms in the U.S. either divested their timberlands to timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and conservation organizations or converted their corporate structures from C corporations to real estate investment trusts (REITs). All landowners sold smaller timberland tracts for nonforestry uses. Reduced timber supplies from conservation organizations and timberland loss to other nonforestry uses have consequences on producer and consumer surpluses in the U.S. timber markets. Equilibrium displacement model has been employed to evaluate the welfare changes in U.S. timber markets attributed to timberland ownership changes. Net reduction of timber supply contributed to the reduction of social surplus by $43 million in 2006. Compared to the $33 billion plus U.S. timber markets, this welfare reduction was small. Overall, this article explains the shifts of economic surpluses among producers and net surplus reduction for the society attributed to timberland ownership changes in the United States.http://www.foodandagriculturejournal.com/vol4.no3.pp33.pdfMarket equilibriumPriceSurplusTaxWelfare |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Ian Alexander Munn Changyou Sun |
spellingShingle |
Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Ian Alexander Munn Changyou Sun WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics Market equilibrium Price Surplus Tax Welfare |
author_facet |
Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman Ian Alexander Munn Changyou Sun |
author_sort |
Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman |
title |
WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS |
title_short |
WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS |
title_full |
WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS |
title_fullStr |
WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS |
title_full_unstemmed |
WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS |
title_sort |
welfare implications of timberland ownership changes in the u.s. timber markets |
publisher |
International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics |
series |
International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics |
issn |
2147-8988 |
publishDate |
2016-07-01 |
description |
In the last two decades, many forest product firms in the U.S. either divested their timberlands to timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and conservation organizations or converted their corporate structures from C corporations to real estate investment trusts (REITs). All landowners sold smaller timberland tracts for nonforestry uses. Reduced timber supplies from conservation organizations and timberland loss to other nonforestry uses have consequences on producer and consumer surpluses in the U.S. timber markets. Equilibrium displacement model has been employed to evaluate the welfare changes in U.S. timber markets attributed to timberland ownership changes. Net reduction of timber supply contributed to the reduction of social surplus by $43 million in 2006. Compared to the $33 billion plus U.S. timber markets, this welfare reduction was small. Overall, this article explains the shifts of economic surpluses among producers and net surplus reduction for the society attributed to timberland ownership changes in the United States. |
topic |
Market equilibrium Price Surplus Tax Welfare |
url |
http://www.foodandagriculturejournal.com/vol4.no3.pp33.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mohammadmahfuzurrahman welfareimplicationsoftimberlandownershipchangesintheustimbermarkets AT ianalexandermunn welfareimplicationsoftimberlandownershipchangesintheustimbermarkets AT changyousun welfareimplicationsoftimberlandownershipchangesintheustimbermarkets |
_version_ |
1725636150501048320 |