WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS

In the last two decades, many forest product firms in the U.S. either divested their timberlands to timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and conservation organizations or converted their corporate structures from C corporations to real estate investment trusts (REITs). All landowners s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman, Ian Alexander Munn, Changyou Sun
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics 2016-07-01
Series:International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics
Subjects:
Tax
Online Access:http://www.foodandagriculturejournal.com/vol4.no3.pp33.pdf
id doaj-4e82912060bb480f81bd481caa552d87
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e82912060bb480f81bd481caa552d872020-11-24T23:02:34ZengInternational Journal of Food and Agricultural EconomicsInternational Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics2147-89882016-07-01433348WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETSMohammad Mahfuzur Rahman 0Ian Alexander Munn1Changyou Sun 2niversity of Chittagong, BangladeshMississippi State University, USAMississippi State University, USAIn the last two decades, many forest product firms in the U.S. either divested their timberlands to timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and conservation organizations or converted their corporate structures from C corporations to real estate investment trusts (REITs). All landowners sold smaller timberland tracts for nonforestry uses. Reduced timber supplies from conservation organizations and timberland loss to other nonforestry uses have consequences on producer and consumer surpluses in the U.S. timber markets. Equilibrium displacement model has been employed to evaluate the welfare changes in U.S. timber markets attributed to timberland ownership changes. Net reduction of timber supply contributed to the reduction of social surplus by $43 million in 2006. Compared to the $33 billion plus U.S. timber markets, this welfare reduction was small. Overall, this article explains the shifts of economic surpluses among producers and net surplus reduction for the society attributed to timberland ownership changes in the United States.http://www.foodandagriculturejournal.com/vol4.no3.pp33.pdfMarket equilibriumPriceSurplusTaxWelfare
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman
Ian Alexander Munn
Changyou Sun
spellingShingle Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman
Ian Alexander Munn
Changyou Sun
WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS
International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics
Market equilibrium
Price
Surplus
Tax
Welfare
author_facet Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman
Ian Alexander Munn
Changyou Sun
author_sort Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman
title WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS
title_short WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS
title_full WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS
title_fullStr WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS
title_full_unstemmed WELFARE IMPLICATIONS OF TIMBERLAND OWNERSHIP CHANGES IN THE U.S. TIMBER MARKETS
title_sort welfare implications of timberland ownership changes in the u.s. timber markets
publisher International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics
series International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics
issn 2147-8988
publishDate 2016-07-01
description In the last two decades, many forest product firms in the U.S. either divested their timberlands to timber investment management organizations (TIMOs) and conservation organizations or converted their corporate structures from C corporations to real estate investment trusts (REITs). All landowners sold smaller timberland tracts for nonforestry uses. Reduced timber supplies from conservation organizations and timberland loss to other nonforestry uses have consequences on producer and consumer surpluses in the U.S. timber markets. Equilibrium displacement model has been employed to evaluate the welfare changes in U.S. timber markets attributed to timberland ownership changes. Net reduction of timber supply contributed to the reduction of social surplus by $43 million in 2006. Compared to the $33 billion plus U.S. timber markets, this welfare reduction was small. Overall, this article explains the shifts of economic surpluses among producers and net surplus reduction for the society attributed to timberland ownership changes in the United States.
topic Market equilibrium
Price
Surplus
Tax
Welfare
url http://www.foodandagriculturejournal.com/vol4.no3.pp33.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadmahfuzurrahman welfareimplicationsoftimberlandownershipchangesintheustimbermarkets
AT ianalexandermunn welfareimplicationsoftimberlandownershipchangesintheustimbermarkets
AT changyousun welfareimplicationsoftimberlandownershipchangesintheustimbermarkets
_version_ 1725636150501048320