Ending elitism in peer-review publication

Ending elitism in peer-review publication

N/A

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Lonnie W Aarssen, Christopher J Lortie
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Queen's University 2009-12-01
Series:	Ideas in Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:	author fees bias impact factor peer-review publication reviewer incentive
Online Access:	https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/IEE/article/view/2198

Similar Items

Ideas for judging merit in manuscripts and authors
by: Lonnie Aarssen, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01)

Three common sources of error in peer review and how to minimize them
by: Lonnie Aarssen
Published: (2017-01-01)

Science Open Reviewed: An online community connecting authors with reviewers for journals
by: Lonnie Aarssen, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

Are peer-review filters optimal for the progress of science in ecology and evolution?
by: Lonnie Aarssen
Published: (2012-05-01)

Abuse of peer review process by sham authors
by: Senthil Kumar, et al.
Published: (2020-05-01)

How Many Papers Should Scientists Be Reviewing? An Analysis Using Verified Peer Review Reports
by: Vincent Raoult
Published: (2020-01-01)

Peer review golden rules and good practice checklist
by: Irene Hames
Published: (2016-02-01)

The journal impact factor contest leads to erosion of quality of peer review
by: David Wardle
Published: (2015-02-01)

Peer review is academic citizenship
by: Keyan G. Tomaselli
Published: (2020-09-01)

From Editor-in-Chief: Peer-review experience at the Heart, Vessels and Transplantation
by: Gulmira Kudaiberdieva
Published: (2020-03-01)

Aggregating post-publication peer reviews and ratings
by: Răzvan Valentin Florian
Published: (2012-05-01)

A Decade of Publication of the First Peer-reviewed Scientifi c Journal in Mongolia – Mongolian Journal of Biological Sciences
by: Badamdorj Bayartogtokh
Published: (2012-12-01)

The need for post-publication peer review in plant science publishing
by: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva
Published: (2013-12-01)

Peer-Review Guidelines Promoting Replicability and Transparency in Psychological Science
by: Davis, W.E, et al.
Published: (2018)

Double blinding in peer review: is it worth the hype?
by: Colin Suen
Published: (2014-05-01)

Peer review practices by medical imaging journals
by: Thomas C. Kwee, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01)

Academic Publishing: A Faustian Bargain?
by: Grant Samkin
Published: (2011-03-01)

Publishing, Objectivity, and Prestige
by: Khaled Moustafa
Published: (2016-12-01)

Peer review and publication delay
by: Fernandez-Llimos F, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Post-publication peer review, in all its guises, is here to stay
by: Michael L Markie
Published: (2015-07-01)

Gender bias in scholarly peer review
by: Markus Helmer, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Making the most of peer review
by: Nikolai Slavov
Published: (2015-11-01)

The Role of the Anonymous Voice in Post-Publication Peer Review Versus Traditional Peer Review
by: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, et al.
Published: (2015-12-01)

Reviewing Peer Review
by: José Florencio F. Lapeña
Published: (2014-06-01)

Conversion of Thesis to Peer-Reviewed Publication
by: Dhaval Shukla, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Innovations in scholarly peer review at Nature Publishing Group and Palgrave Macmillan
by: Amy Bourke-Waite
Published: (2015-07-01)

THE PEER REVIEW PROCESS IN ASIA
by: Sakir Ahmed, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)

Who Is (Likely) Peer-Reviewing Your Papers? A Partial Insight into the World’s Top Reviewers
by: Francesco Pomponi, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Does mentoring new peer reviewers improve review quality? A randomized trial
by: Houry Debra, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01)

Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
by: Charles W. Fox, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01)

Reviewing the review process : Investigation of researchers' opinions on different methods of peer review
by: Rebernig, Carolin Anna
Published: (2018)

Uptake and outcome of manuscripts in Nature journals by review model and author characteristics
by: Barbara McGillivray, et al.
Published: (2018-08-01)

The problem with data
by: Lonnie Aarssen
Published: (2016-01-01)

The changing face of peer review
by: Irene Hames
Published: (2014-02-01)

Gender diversity of editorial boards and gender differences in the peer review process at six journals of ecology and evolution
by: Charles W. Fox, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

Peer review of manuscripts submitted to medical journals
by: Mohamed Abdelfattah Mahmoud Youssef
Published: (2012-06-01)

Peer Review in Controversial Topics—A Case Study of 9/11
by: John D. Wyndham
Published: (2017-06-01)

Peer review art
by: Shahryar Sorooshian
Published: (2017-07-01)

Peer review - Why, when and how
by: Philip J. Steer, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Emerging trends in peer review - a survey
by: Richard eWalker, et al.
Published: (2015-05-01)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_08stcfacafakorta6bhojgk7ui