Comparing Two Inferential Approaches to Handling Measurement Error in Mixed-Mode Surveys
Nowadays sample survey data collection strategies combine web, telephone, face-to-face, or other modes of interviewing in a sequential fashion. Measurement bias of survey estimates of means and totals are composed of different mode-dependent measurement errors as each data collection mode has its ow...
Main Authors: | Buelens Bart, Van den Brakel Jan A. |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Official Statistics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/jos-2017-0024 |
Similar Items
-
Measurement equivalence in mixed mode surveys
by: Joop J. Hox, et al.
Published: (2015-02-01) -
Quality in Unimode and Mixed-Mode designs: A Multitrait-Multimethod approach
by: Melanie Revilla
Published: (2010-12-01) -
Measuring and testing the interview mode effect in mixed mode surveys
by: Furio Camillo, et al.
Published: (2014-10-01) -
The Effect of Survey Mode on Data Quality: Disentangling Nonresponse and Measurement Error Bias
by: Felderer Barbara, et al.
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Comparison of response patterns in different survey designs: a longitudinal panel with mixed-mode and online-only design
by: Nicole Rübsamen, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)