Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists
Abstract The global scientific community has become increasingly diverse over recent decades, but is this ongoing development also reflected among top‐publishing authors and potential scientific leaders? We surveyed 13 leading journals in ecology, evolution, and conservation to investigate the diver...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Conservation Letters |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12797 |
id |
doaj-4e6d4288ae3046c181eaae8c2f6128f0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e6d4288ae3046c181eaae8c2f6128f02021-08-23T21:21:41ZengWileyConservation Letters1755-263X2021-07-01144n/an/a10.1111/conl.12797Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologistsBea Maas0Robin J Pakeman1Laurent Godet2Linnea Smith3Vincent Devictor4Richard Primack5Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Division of Conservation Biology, Vegetation Ecology and Landscape Ecology University of Vienna Rennweg 14 Vienna 1030 AustriaThe James Hutton Institute Craigiebuckler Aberdeen AB15 8QH UKCNRS Université de Nantes Chemin de la Censive du Tertre ‐ BP 81227 Nantes 44312 FranceGerman Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐Leipzig Puschstraße 4 Leipzig 04103 GermanyISEM CNRS EPHE IRD University of Montpellier Place Eugene Bataillon CC065 Montpellier 34095 FranceBiology Department Boston University 5 Cummington Mall Boston Massachusetts MA 02215 USAAbstract The global scientific community has become increasingly diverse over recent decades, but is this ongoing development also reflected among top‐publishing authors and potential scientific leaders? We surveyed 13 leading journals in ecology, evolution, and conservation to investigate the diversity of the 100 top‐publishing authors in each journal between 1945 and 2019. Out of 1051 individual top‐publishing authors, only 11% are women. The United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Canada account for more than 75% of top‐publishing authors, while countries of the Global South (as well as Russia, Japan, and South Korea) were strikingly underrepresented. The number of top‐publishing authors who are women and/or are from the Global South is increasing only slowly over time. We outline transformative actions that scientific communities can take to enhance diversity, equity and inclusion at author, leadership, and society level. The resulting promotion of scientific innovation and productivity is essential for the development of global solutions in conservation science.https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12797authorshipdiversitygenderglobalinclusionleadership |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Bea Maas Robin J Pakeman Laurent Godet Linnea Smith Vincent Devictor Richard Primack |
spellingShingle |
Bea Maas Robin J Pakeman Laurent Godet Linnea Smith Vincent Devictor Richard Primack Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists Conservation Letters authorship diversity gender global inclusion leadership |
author_facet |
Bea Maas Robin J Pakeman Laurent Godet Linnea Smith Vincent Devictor Richard Primack |
author_sort |
Bea Maas |
title |
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists |
title_short |
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists |
title_full |
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists |
title_fullStr |
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists |
title_full_unstemmed |
Women and Global South strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists |
title_sort |
women and global south strikingly underrepresented among top‐publishing ecologists |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Conservation Letters |
issn |
1755-263X |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Abstract The global scientific community has become increasingly diverse over recent decades, but is this ongoing development also reflected among top‐publishing authors and potential scientific leaders? We surveyed 13 leading journals in ecology, evolution, and conservation to investigate the diversity of the 100 top‐publishing authors in each journal between 1945 and 2019. Out of 1051 individual top‐publishing authors, only 11% are women. The United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany, and Canada account for more than 75% of top‐publishing authors, while countries of the Global South (as well as Russia, Japan, and South Korea) were strikingly underrepresented. The number of top‐publishing authors who are women and/or are from the Global South is increasing only slowly over time. We outline transformative actions that scientific communities can take to enhance diversity, equity and inclusion at author, leadership, and society level. The resulting promotion of scientific innovation and productivity is essential for the development of global solutions in conservation science. |
topic |
authorship diversity gender global inclusion leadership |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12797 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT beamaas womenandglobalsouthstrikinglyunderrepresentedamongtoppublishingecologists AT robinjpakeman womenandglobalsouthstrikinglyunderrepresentedamongtoppublishingecologists AT laurentgodet womenandglobalsouthstrikinglyunderrepresentedamongtoppublishingecologists AT linneasmith womenandglobalsouthstrikinglyunderrepresentedamongtoppublishingecologists AT vincentdevictor womenandglobalsouthstrikinglyunderrepresentedamongtoppublishingecologists AT richardprimack womenandglobalsouthstrikinglyunderrepresentedamongtoppublishingecologists |
_version_ |
1721198132355661824 |