Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies

Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanyi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian M. de Silva, David M. Higdon, Steven L. Brunton, J. Nathan Kutz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00025/full
id doaj-4e4b19b4854045fb953f1d701e9055b5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e4b19b4854045fb953f1d701e9055b52020-11-25T03:02:46ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence2624-82122020-04-01310.3389/frai.2020.00025479363Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and DiscrepanciesBrian M. de Silva0David M. Higdon1Steven L. Brunton2J. Nathan Kutz3Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesDepartment of Statistics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, United StatesMechanical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesApplied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United StatesMachine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanying discrepancy model to account for the inevitable mismatch between theory and measurements. By revisiting the classic problem of modeling falling objects of different size and mass, we highlight a number of nuanced issues that must be addressed by modern data-driven methods for automated physics discovery. Specifically, we show that measurement noise and complex secondary physical mechanisms, like unsteady fluid drag forces, can obscure the underlying law of gravitation, leading to an erroneous model. We use the sparse identification of non-linear dynamics (SINDy) method to identify governing equations for real-world measurement data and simulated trajectories. Incorporating into SINDy the assumption that each falling object is governed by a similar physical law is shown to improve the robustness of the learned models, but discrepancies between the predictions and observations persist due to subtleties in drag dynamics. This work highlights the fact that the naive application of ML/AI will generally be insufficient to infer universal physical laws without further modification.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00025/fulldynamical systemssystem identificationmachine learningartificial intelligencesparse regressiondiscrepancy modeling
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brian M. de Silva
David M. Higdon
Steven L. Brunton
J. Nathan Kutz
spellingShingle Brian M. de Silva
David M. Higdon
Steven L. Brunton
J. Nathan Kutz
Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
dynamical systems
system identification
machine learning
artificial intelligence
sparse regression
discrepancy modeling
author_facet Brian M. de Silva
David M. Higdon
Steven L. Brunton
J. Nathan Kutz
author_sort Brian M. de Silva
title Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_short Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_full Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_fullStr Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_full_unstemmed Discovery of Physics From Data: Universal Laws and Discrepancies
title_sort discovery of physics from data: universal laws and discrepancies
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
issn 2624-8212
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms are now being used to automate the discovery of physics principles and governing equations from measurement data alone. However, positing a universal physical law from data is challenging without simultaneously proposing an accompanying discrepancy model to account for the inevitable mismatch between theory and measurements. By revisiting the classic problem of modeling falling objects of different size and mass, we highlight a number of nuanced issues that must be addressed by modern data-driven methods for automated physics discovery. Specifically, we show that measurement noise and complex secondary physical mechanisms, like unsteady fluid drag forces, can obscure the underlying law of gravitation, leading to an erroneous model. We use the sparse identification of non-linear dynamics (SINDy) method to identify governing equations for real-world measurement data and simulated trajectories. Incorporating into SINDy the assumption that each falling object is governed by a similar physical law is shown to improve the robustness of the learned models, but discrepancies between the predictions and observations persist due to subtleties in drag dynamics. This work highlights the fact that the naive application of ML/AI will generally be insufficient to infer universal physical laws without further modification.
topic dynamical systems
system identification
machine learning
artificial intelligence
sparse regression
discrepancy modeling
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frai.2020.00025/full
work_keys_str_mv AT brianmdesilva discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies
AT davidmhigdon discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies
AT stevenlbrunton discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies
AT jnathankutz discoveryofphysicsfromdatauniversallawsanddiscrepancies
_version_ 1724688527016329216