Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-survey

Introduction Induction of labour is common, with a large variety of indications and methods. Women’s views and experiences still need to be explored in more depth. This study evaluated outcomes and childbirth experiences with different induction methods as perceived by women. Methods A secondary da...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martina König-Bachmann, Christiane Schwarz, Christoph Zenzmaier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: European Publishing 2017-09-01
Series:European Journal of Midwifery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.journalssystem.com/ejm/Women-s-experiences-and-perceptions-of-induction-of-labour-Results-from-a-German,76511,0,2.html
id doaj-4e49810fda904bacae81762f61ec5d19
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e49810fda904bacae81762f61ec5d192020-11-24T21:14:20ZengEuropean PublishingEuropean Journal of Midwifery2585-29062017-09-011September10.18332/ejm/7651176511Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-surveyMartina König-Bachmann0Christiane Schwarz1Christoph Zenzmaier2University of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, AustriaUniversity of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, AustriaUniversity of Applied Sciences Tyrol, Innsbruck, AustriaIntroduction Induction of labour is common, with a large variety of indications and methods. Women’s views and experiences still need to be explored in more depth. This study evaluated outcomes and childbirth experiences with different induction methods as perceived by women. Methods A secondary data analysis of an online-survey with 698 participants comprising closed-ended and open-ended questions evaluating method and reason for induction, gestational age, mode of birth, assessment of received information, support and participation in decision-making, as well as the individual experience of labour and birth, was performed in 2015. Answers to open-ended questions were coded and assigned to main categories by inductive-content analysis. Subgroup analyses comparing frequencies of answer options or main categories dependent on induction methods and indications were conducted. Results Women frequently expressed a need for more information and participation, and reported negative childbirth experiences. Women being offered castor oil or other complementary and alternative methods less often lacked information. However, these methods were markedly less effective to induce labour, but when successful were associated with reduced rates of epidural pain relieve and caesarean sections. Moreover, compared with prostaglandins, complementary methods were associated with significantly more positive personal experiences and fewer burdensome or traumatic births. Conclusions Our findings revealed a substantial lack of information and participation associated with many women perceiving negatively labour and childbirth following induction. Adequate honest information that gives way to realistic expectations about labour induction and enablement of participation are important prerequisites to improve personal experience and need to be enhanced in order to raise childbirth satisfaction.http://www.journalssystem.com/ejm/Women-s-experiences-and-perceptions-of-induction-of-labour-Results-from-a-German,76511,0,2.htmlinduced laborinduction of labourlabor onsetparticipationcomplementary alternative medicinechildbirth satisfaction
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martina König-Bachmann
Christiane Schwarz
Christoph Zenzmaier
spellingShingle Martina König-Bachmann
Christiane Schwarz
Christoph Zenzmaier
Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-survey
European Journal of Midwifery
induced labor
induction of labour
labor onset
participation
complementary alternative medicine
childbirth satisfaction
author_facet Martina König-Bachmann
Christiane Schwarz
Christoph Zenzmaier
author_sort Martina König-Bachmann
title Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-survey
title_short Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-survey
title_full Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-survey
title_fullStr Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-survey
title_full_unstemmed Women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: Results from a German online-survey
title_sort women’s experiences and perceptions of induction of labour: results from a german online-survey
publisher European Publishing
series European Journal of Midwifery
issn 2585-2906
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Introduction Induction of labour is common, with a large variety of indications and methods. Women’s views and experiences still need to be explored in more depth. This study evaluated outcomes and childbirth experiences with different induction methods as perceived by women. Methods A secondary data analysis of an online-survey with 698 participants comprising closed-ended and open-ended questions evaluating method and reason for induction, gestational age, mode of birth, assessment of received information, support and participation in decision-making, as well as the individual experience of labour and birth, was performed in 2015. Answers to open-ended questions were coded and assigned to main categories by inductive-content analysis. Subgroup analyses comparing frequencies of answer options or main categories dependent on induction methods and indications were conducted. Results Women frequently expressed a need for more information and participation, and reported negative childbirth experiences. Women being offered castor oil or other complementary and alternative methods less often lacked information. However, these methods were markedly less effective to induce labour, but when successful were associated with reduced rates of epidural pain relieve and caesarean sections. Moreover, compared with prostaglandins, complementary methods were associated with significantly more positive personal experiences and fewer burdensome or traumatic births. Conclusions Our findings revealed a substantial lack of information and participation associated with many women perceiving negatively labour and childbirth following induction. Adequate honest information that gives way to realistic expectations about labour induction and enablement of participation are important prerequisites to improve personal experience and need to be enhanced in order to raise childbirth satisfaction.
topic induced labor
induction of labour
labor onset
participation
complementary alternative medicine
childbirth satisfaction
url http://www.journalssystem.com/ejm/Women-s-experiences-and-perceptions-of-induction-of-labour-Results-from-a-German,76511,0,2.html
work_keys_str_mv AT martinakonigbachmann womensexperiencesandperceptionsofinductionoflabourresultsfromagermanonlinesurvey
AT christianeschwarz womensexperiencesandperceptionsofinductionoflabourresultsfromagermanonlinesurvey
AT christophzenzmaier womensexperiencesandperceptionsofinductionoflabourresultsfromagermanonlinesurvey
_version_ 1716747678897930240