Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI

The aim of the present study is to test the Strong Morphonotactic Hypothesis (SMH), according to which speakers use morphonotactic consonant clusters as morphological boundary signals (Korecky-Kröll et al. 2014). It is hypothesized that morphonotactic clusters will be better retained during producti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics) 2015-04-01
Series:Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.06
id doaj-4e2e7fddaf594a779e013c27ac007348
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e2e7fddaf594a779e013c27ac0073482020-11-24T22:54:19ZengEesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat1736-25632228-06772015-04-01119510910.5128/ERYa11.06Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLILaura Kamandulytė-MerfeldienėThe aim of the present study is to test the Strong Morphonotactic Hypothesis (SMH), according to which speakers use morphonotactic consonant clusters as morphological boundary signals (Korecky-Kröll et al. 2014). It is hypothesized that morphonotactic clusters will be better retained during production than phonotactic clusters due to the function fulfilled by a morpheme. The study is based on experimental data collected from 60 Lithuanian TD children and 11 Lithuanian SLI children. This study explores the impact of morphology on the acquisition of phonotactics. The findings suggest that TD children process morphonotactic clusters more accurately than phonotactic clusters because morphonotactic clusters have the function of co-signalling the existence of a morphological rule. In contrast to TD children, for SLI children prototypical morphonotactic clusters are the most difficult as SLI children are not sensitive to morphological information which is carried by morphonotactic clusters. http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.06morphonologyconsonant clusterphonotacticsmorpheme boundaryLithuanian
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė
spellingShingle Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė
Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat
morphonology
consonant cluster
phonotactics
morpheme boundary
Lithuanian
author_facet Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė
author_sort Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė
title Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI
title_short Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI
title_full Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI
title_fullStr Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI
title_full_unstemmed Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI
title_sort morphonotactics in l1 acquisition of lithuanian: td vs. sli
publisher Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)
series Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat
issn 1736-2563
2228-0677
publishDate 2015-04-01
description The aim of the present study is to test the Strong Morphonotactic Hypothesis (SMH), according to which speakers use morphonotactic consonant clusters as morphological boundary signals (Korecky-Kröll et al. 2014). It is hypothesized that morphonotactic clusters will be better retained during production than phonotactic clusters due to the function fulfilled by a morpheme. The study is based on experimental data collected from 60 Lithuanian TD children and 11 Lithuanian SLI children. This study explores the impact of morphology on the acquisition of phonotactics. The findings suggest that TD children process morphonotactic clusters more accurately than phonotactic clusters because morphonotactic clusters have the function of co-signalling the existence of a morphological rule. In contrast to TD children, for SLI children prototypical morphonotactic clusters are the most difficult as SLI children are not sensitive to morphological information which is carried by morphonotactic clusters.
topic morphonology
consonant cluster
phonotactics
morpheme boundary
Lithuanian
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.06
work_keys_str_mv AT laurakamandulytemerfeldiene morphonotacticsinl1acquisitionoflithuaniantdvssli
_version_ 1725660671292473344