Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI
The aim of the present study is to test the Strong Morphonotactic Hypothesis (SMH), according to which speakers use morphonotactic consonant clusters as morphological boundary signals (Korecky-Kröll et al. 2014). It is hypothesized that morphonotactic clusters will be better retained during producti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)
2015-04-01
|
Series: | Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.06 |
id |
doaj-4e2e7fddaf594a779e013c27ac007348 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e2e7fddaf594a779e013c27ac0073482020-11-24T22:54:19ZengEesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics)Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat1736-25632228-06772015-04-01119510910.5128/ERYa11.06Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLILaura Kamandulytė-MerfeldienėThe aim of the present study is to test the Strong Morphonotactic Hypothesis (SMH), according to which speakers use morphonotactic consonant clusters as morphological boundary signals (Korecky-Kröll et al. 2014). It is hypothesized that morphonotactic clusters will be better retained during production than phonotactic clusters due to the function fulfilled by a morpheme. The study is based on experimental data collected from 60 Lithuanian TD children and 11 Lithuanian SLI children. This study explores the impact of morphology on the acquisition of phonotactics. The findings suggest that TD children process morphonotactic clusters more accurately than phonotactic clusters because morphonotactic clusters have the function of co-signalling the existence of a morphological rule. In contrast to TD children, for SLI children prototypical morphonotactic clusters are the most difficult as SLI children are not sensitive to morphological information which is carried by morphonotactic clusters. http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.06morphonologyconsonant clusterphonotacticsmorpheme boundaryLithuanian |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė |
spellingShingle |
Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat morphonology consonant cluster phonotactics morpheme boundary Lithuanian |
author_facet |
Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė |
author_sort |
Laura Kamandulytė-Merfeldienė |
title |
Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI |
title_short |
Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI |
title_full |
Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI |
title_fullStr |
Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI |
title_full_unstemmed |
Morphonotactics in L1 acquisition of Lithuanian: TD vs. SLI |
title_sort |
morphonotactics in l1 acquisition of lithuanian: td vs. sli |
publisher |
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühing (Estonian Association for Applied Linguistics) |
series |
Eesti Rakenduslingvistika Ühingu Aastaraamat |
issn |
1736-2563 2228-0677 |
publishDate |
2015-04-01 |
description |
The aim of the present study is to test the Strong Morphonotactic Hypothesis (SMH), according to which speakers use morphonotactic consonant clusters as morphological boundary signals (Korecky-Kröll et al. 2014). It is hypothesized that morphonotactic clusters will be better retained during production than phonotactic clusters due to the function fulfilled by a morpheme. The study is based on experimental data collected from 60 Lithuanian TD children and 11 Lithuanian SLI children.
This study explores the impact of morphology on the acquisition of phonotactics. The findings suggest that TD children process morphonotactic clusters more accurately than phonotactic clusters because morphonotactic clusters have the function of co-signalling the existence of a morphological rule. In contrast to TD children, for SLI children prototypical morphonotactic clusters are the most difficult as SLI children are not sensitive to morphological information which is carried by morphonotactic clusters. |
topic |
morphonology consonant cluster phonotactics morpheme boundary Lithuanian |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5128/ERYa11.06 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT laurakamandulytemerfeldiene morphonotacticsinl1acquisitionoflithuaniantdvssli |
_version_ |
1725660671292473344 |