Reasoning in the valuation of health‐related quality of life: A qualitative content analysis of deliberations in a pilot study
Abstract Background Group deliberation can be a pathway to understanding reasons behind judgement decisions. This pilot study implemented a deliberative process to elicit public values about health‐related quality of life. In this study, participants deliberated scales and weights for a German adapt...
Main Authors: | Fabia Gansen, Julian Klinger |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-04-01
|
Series: | Health Expectations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13011 |
Similar Items
-
MCDA-based deliberation to value health states: lessons learned from a pilot study
by: Fabia Gansen, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Combined Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach Based on MACBETH and MULTI-MOORA Methods
by: Nilsen Kundakcı
Published: (2016-04-01) -
Participatory Environmental Valuation: A Comparative Analysis of Four Case Studies
by: Leslie Carnoye, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
A MCDA MODEL FOR OLIVE OIL SUPPLIER SELECTION USING MACBETH
by: Teresa Pereira, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01) -
Valuing health states: is the MACBETH approach useful for valuing EQ-5D-3L health states?
by: Mónica Duarte Oliveira, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)