Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń

The aim of this work is to establish to what extent discrepancies of substantive misdemeanour law (relating to criminal law), which stem from simplification of responsibility rules, impact the position of victim. There are no general rules and principles relating to formation of the position of vict...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Olga Sitarz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Silesia Press 2019-12-01
Series:Problemy Prawa Karnego
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ppk/article/view/11879
id doaj-4e2108af9cb648b086ed019beec1a780
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e2108af9cb648b086ed019beec1a7802021-08-17T11:24:00ZengUniversity of Silesia PressProblemy Prawa Karnego0208-55772353-97122019-12-01293516510.31261/PPK.2019.03.0311879Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeńOlga Sitarz0Uniwersytet ŚląskiThe aim of this work is to establish to what extent discrepancies of substantive misdemeanour law (relating to criminal law), which stem from simplification of responsibility rules, impact the position of victim. There are no general rules and principles relating to formation of the position of victim in either criminal law or misdemeanour law. Only by analysing particular regulations of the both respective codes allows one to reconstruct the status of victim and confronting it on the plain of the two responsibility regimes in question. The said confrontation reveals far-reaching differences within the scope of victim’s position in substantive regulations of misdemeanour law, some of which weaken the victim’s position, while other – strengthen it. Although those differences vary to their weight, yet it seems that regulations restricting the presence of the figure of victim are more significant – they genuinely decrease the competence of a person to whom the harm was made. Amongst the said regulations, first and foremost, have to be counted those that relate to possibility of ruling compensatory penal measures, as well as regulations defining the periods of limitation (aside from other discussed regulations). The assumed dual model of responsibility within this scope, in some cases, compromises the principle of equality before the law enshrined in Article 32 paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ppk/article/view/11879victimmisdemeanourequality before the lawthe responsibility rule
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Olga Sitarz
spellingShingle Olga Sitarz
Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń
Problemy Prawa Karnego
victim
misdemeanour
equality before the law
the responsibility rule
author_facet Olga Sitarz
author_sort Olga Sitarz
title Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń
title_short Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń
title_full Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń
title_fullStr Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń
title_full_unstemmed Pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń
title_sort pozycja pokrzywdzonego na tle przepisów materialnego prawa wykroczeń
publisher University of Silesia Press
series Problemy Prawa Karnego
issn 0208-5577
2353-9712
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The aim of this work is to establish to what extent discrepancies of substantive misdemeanour law (relating to criminal law), which stem from simplification of responsibility rules, impact the position of victim. There are no general rules and principles relating to formation of the position of victim in either criminal law or misdemeanour law. Only by analysing particular regulations of the both respective codes allows one to reconstruct the status of victim and confronting it on the plain of the two responsibility regimes in question. The said confrontation reveals far-reaching differences within the scope of victim’s position in substantive regulations of misdemeanour law, some of which weaken the victim’s position, while other – strengthen it. Although those differences vary to their weight, yet it seems that regulations restricting the presence of the figure of victim are more significant – they genuinely decrease the competence of a person to whom the harm was made. Amongst the said regulations, first and foremost, have to be counted those that relate to possibility of ruling compensatory penal measures, as well as regulations defining the periods of limitation (aside from other discussed regulations). The assumed dual model of responsibility within this scope, in some cases, compromises the principle of equality before the law enshrined in Article 32 paragraph 1 of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland.
topic victim
misdemeanour
equality before the law
the responsibility rule
url https://journals.us.edu.pl/index.php/ppk/article/view/11879
work_keys_str_mv AT olgasitarz pozycjapokrzywdzonegonatleprzepisowmaterialnegoprawawykroczen
_version_ 1721205091454681088