The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility
The social interaction anxiety scale (SIAS) and the social phobia scale (SPS) assess anxiety in social interactions and fear of scrutiny by others. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Dutch versions of the SIAS and SPS using data from a large group of patients with social phobia a...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Psychiatry Journal |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/360193 |
id |
doaj-4e0fb28800c94b41849c5570f353df80 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4e0fb28800c94b41849c5570f353df802020-11-24T22:50:22ZengHindawi LimitedPsychiatry Journal2314-43272314-43352014-01-01201410.1155/2014/360193360193The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical UtilityEdwin de Beurs0Deirdre Tielen1Lisa Wollmann2Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsRivierduinen Mental Health Institution, Postbus 405, 2300 AK Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The NetherlandsThe social interaction anxiety scale (SIAS) and the social phobia scale (SPS) assess anxiety in social interactions and fear of scrutiny by others. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Dutch versions of the SIAS and SPS using data from a large group of patients with social phobia and a community-based sample. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the SIAS is unidimensional, whereas the SPS is comprised of three subscales. The internal consistency of the scales and subscales was good. The concurrent and discriminant validity was supported and the scales were well able to discriminate between patients and community-based respondents. Cut-off values with excellent sensitivity and specificity are presented. Of all self-report measures included, the SPS was the most sensitive for treatment effects. Normative data are provided which can be used to assess whether clinically significant change has occurred in individual patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/360193 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Edwin de Beurs Deirdre Tielen Lisa Wollmann |
spellingShingle |
Edwin de Beurs Deirdre Tielen Lisa Wollmann The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility Psychiatry Journal |
author_facet |
Edwin de Beurs Deirdre Tielen Lisa Wollmann |
author_sort |
Edwin de Beurs |
title |
The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility |
title_short |
The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility |
title_full |
The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility |
title_fullStr |
The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility |
title_sort |
dutch social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale: reliability, validity, and clinical utility |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Psychiatry Journal |
issn |
2314-4327 2314-4335 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
The social interaction anxiety scale (SIAS) and the social phobia scale (SPS) assess anxiety in social interactions and fear of scrutiny by others. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Dutch versions of the SIAS and SPS using data from a large group of patients with social phobia and a community-based sample. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the SIAS is unidimensional, whereas the SPS is comprised of three subscales. The internal consistency of the scales and subscales was good. The concurrent and discriminant validity was supported and the scales were well able to discriminate between patients and community-based respondents. Cut-off values with excellent sensitivity and specificity are presented. Of all self-report measures included, the SPS was the most sensitive for treatment effects. Normative data are provided which can be used to assess whether clinically significant change has occurred in individual patients. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/360193 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT edwindebeurs thedutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility AT deirdretielen thedutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility AT lisawollmann thedutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility AT edwindebeurs dutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility AT deirdretielen dutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility AT lisawollmann dutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility |
_version_ |
1725672773620072448 |