The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility

The social interaction anxiety scale (SIAS) and the social phobia scale (SPS) assess anxiety in social interactions and fear of scrutiny by others. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Dutch versions of the SIAS and SPS using data from a large group of patients with social phobia a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edwin de Beurs, Deirdre Tielen, Lisa Wollmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2014-01-01
Series:Psychiatry Journal
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/360193
id doaj-4e0fb28800c94b41849c5570f353df80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4e0fb28800c94b41849c5570f353df802020-11-24T22:50:22ZengHindawi LimitedPsychiatry Journal2314-43272314-43352014-01-01201410.1155/2014/360193360193The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical UtilityEdwin de Beurs0Deirdre Tielen1Lisa Wollmann2Department of Psychiatry, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, The NetherlandsRivierduinen Mental Health Institution, Postbus 405, 2300 AK Leiden, The NetherlandsDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, 2333 AK Leiden, The NetherlandsThe social interaction anxiety scale (SIAS) and the social phobia scale (SPS) assess anxiety in social interactions and fear of scrutiny by others. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Dutch versions of the SIAS and SPS using data from a large group of patients with social phobia and a community-based sample. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the SIAS is unidimensional, whereas the SPS is comprised of three subscales. The internal consistency of the scales and subscales was good. The concurrent and discriminant validity was supported and the scales were well able to discriminate between patients and community-based respondents. Cut-off values with excellent sensitivity and specificity are presented. Of all self-report measures included, the SPS was the most sensitive for treatment effects. Normative data are provided which can be used to assess whether clinically significant change has occurred in individual patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/360193
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edwin de Beurs
Deirdre Tielen
Lisa Wollmann
spellingShingle Edwin de Beurs
Deirdre Tielen
Lisa Wollmann
The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility
Psychiatry Journal
author_facet Edwin de Beurs
Deirdre Tielen
Lisa Wollmann
author_sort Edwin de Beurs
title The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility
title_short The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility
title_full The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility
title_fullStr The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility
title_full_unstemmed The Dutch Social Interaction Anxiety Scale and the Social Phobia Scale: Reliability, Validity, and Clinical Utility
title_sort dutch social interaction anxiety scale and the social phobia scale: reliability, validity, and clinical utility
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Psychiatry Journal
issn 2314-4327
2314-4335
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The social interaction anxiety scale (SIAS) and the social phobia scale (SPS) assess anxiety in social interactions and fear of scrutiny by others. This study examines the psychometric properties of the Dutch versions of the SIAS and SPS using data from a large group of patients with social phobia and a community-based sample. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the SIAS is unidimensional, whereas the SPS is comprised of three subscales. The internal consistency of the scales and subscales was good. The concurrent and discriminant validity was supported and the scales were well able to discriminate between patients and community-based respondents. Cut-off values with excellent sensitivity and specificity are presented. Of all self-report measures included, the SPS was the most sensitive for treatment effects. Normative data are provided which can be used to assess whether clinically significant change has occurred in individual patients.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/360193
work_keys_str_mv AT edwindebeurs thedutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility
AT deirdretielen thedutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility
AT lisawollmann thedutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility
AT edwindebeurs dutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility
AT deirdretielen dutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility
AT lisawollmann dutchsocialinteractionanxietyscaleandthesocialphobiascalereliabilityvalidityandclinicalutility
_version_ 1725672773620072448