Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?

Aim: The goal of the work was comparing gas ultrasound images below the right diaphragm in two groups: in people with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm and ones with pneumoperitoneum and extracting the traits differentiating these two conditions. Material and methods: Retrospectively,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrzej Smereczyński, Katarzyna Kołaczyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. 2017-03-01
Series:Journal of Ultrasonography
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-17-no-68/is-it-possible-to-differentiate-between-pseudopneumoperitoneum-and-similar-pathologies-ultrasonographically?aid=496
id doaj-4defc59fdeba4865ad4b60d0694fffcb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4defc59fdeba4865ad4b60d0694fffcb2020-11-24T22:33:26ZengMedical Communications Sp. z o.o.Journal of Ultrasonography2084-84042451-070X2017-03-011768303510.15557/JoU.2017.0004Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? Andrzej Smereczyński0Katarzyna Kołaczyk1Genetics and Pathomorphology Center of the Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland Self-Training Ultrasonography Circle, Szczecin, PolandGenetics and Pathomorphology Center of the Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland Self-Training Ultrasonography Circle, Szczecin, PolandAim: The goal of the work was comparing gas ultrasound images below the right diaphragm in two groups: in people with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm and ones with pneumoperitoneum and extracting the traits differentiating these two conditions. Material and methods: Retrospectively, the documentation of 22 patients with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm (group 1) was utilized. Clinical material was used for comparison, previously published, composed of 15 cases of pneumoperitoneum following laparotomy and of 14 cases following that symptom as a result of ulcer perforation – group 2 (in total n = 29). Moreover, the distance in millimeters of the gas surface reflecting ultrasounds from the parietal peritoneum was measured, the smoothness of the surface, parietal peritoneum enhancement at the place of gas adherence, gas continuity below the diaphragm with gas in the intestine located below the liver. Results: Direct adherence of the gas surface to the diaphragm was observed in 100% of the cases of emphysema, but in no cases of intestinal interposition. Yet, in the group of patients with colonic interposition (n = 21) there was always a small gap (2–3 mm) and the gas surface among those patients in 100% of the cases was uneven. Conclusions: In differentiation between pneumoperitoneum and liverdiaphragm interposition of the intestine one should take into account – apart from gas movement below the diaphragm at body position changing – the presence of protrusion and section enhancement of the diaphragmatic peritoneum as well as the distance of the gas from the diaphragm, the smoothness of its surface and the continuity with the intestine below the liver. Interpositions of small diaphragm-liver penetration may subside in erect position. http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-17-no-68/is-it-possible-to-differentiate-between-pseudopneumoperitoneum-and-similar-pathologies-ultrasonographically?aid=496gas below the diaphragmpneumoperitoneumintestinal interpositiondifferentiationultrasonography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrzej Smereczyński
Katarzyna Kołaczyk
spellingShingle Andrzej Smereczyński
Katarzyna Kołaczyk
Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
Journal of Ultrasonography
gas below the diaphragm
pneumoperitoneum
intestinal interposition
differentiation
ultrasonography
author_facet Andrzej Smereczyński
Katarzyna Kołaczyk
author_sort Andrzej Smereczyński
title Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
title_short Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
title_full Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
title_fullStr Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
title_full_unstemmed Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
title_sort is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
publisher Medical Communications Sp. z o.o.
series Journal of Ultrasonography
issn 2084-8404
2451-070X
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Aim: The goal of the work was comparing gas ultrasound images below the right diaphragm in two groups: in people with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm and ones with pneumoperitoneum and extracting the traits differentiating these two conditions. Material and methods: Retrospectively, the documentation of 22 patients with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm (group 1) was utilized. Clinical material was used for comparison, previously published, composed of 15 cases of pneumoperitoneum following laparotomy and of 14 cases following that symptom as a result of ulcer perforation – group 2 (in total n = 29). Moreover, the distance in millimeters of the gas surface reflecting ultrasounds from the parietal peritoneum was measured, the smoothness of the surface, parietal peritoneum enhancement at the place of gas adherence, gas continuity below the diaphragm with gas in the intestine located below the liver. Results: Direct adherence of the gas surface to the diaphragm was observed in 100% of the cases of emphysema, but in no cases of intestinal interposition. Yet, in the group of patients with colonic interposition (n = 21) there was always a small gap (2–3 mm) and the gas surface among those patients in 100% of the cases was uneven. Conclusions: In differentiation between pneumoperitoneum and liverdiaphragm interposition of the intestine one should take into account – apart from gas movement below the diaphragm at body position changing – the presence of protrusion and section enhancement of the diaphragmatic peritoneum as well as the distance of the gas from the diaphragm, the smoothness of its surface and the continuity with the intestine below the liver. Interpositions of small diaphragm-liver penetration may subside in erect position.
topic gas below the diaphragm
pneumoperitoneum
intestinal interposition
differentiation
ultrasonography
url http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-17-no-68/is-it-possible-to-differentiate-between-pseudopneumoperitoneum-and-similar-pathologies-ultrasonographically?aid=496
work_keys_str_mv AT andrzejsmereczynski isitpossibletodifferentiatebetweenpseudopneumoperitoneumandsimilarpathologiesultrasonographically
AT katarzynakołaczyk isitpossibletodifferentiatebetweenpseudopneumoperitoneumandsimilarpathologiesultrasonographically
_version_ 1725731105401733120