Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically?
Aim: The goal of the work was comparing gas ultrasound images below the right diaphragm in two groups: in people with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm and ones with pneumoperitoneum and extracting the traits differentiating these two conditions. Material and methods: Retrospectively,...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Medical Communications Sp. z o.o.
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Ultrasonography |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-17-no-68/is-it-possible-to-differentiate-between-pseudopneumoperitoneum-and-similar-pathologies-ultrasonographically?aid=496 |
id |
doaj-4defc59fdeba4865ad4b60d0694fffcb |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4defc59fdeba4865ad4b60d0694fffcb2020-11-24T22:33:26ZengMedical Communications Sp. z o.o.Journal of Ultrasonography2084-84042451-070X2017-03-011768303510.15557/JoU.2017.0004Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? Andrzej Smereczyński0Katarzyna Kołaczyk1Genetics and Pathomorphology Center of the Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland Self-Training Ultrasonography Circle, Szczecin, PolandGenetics and Pathomorphology Center of the Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland Self-Training Ultrasonography Circle, Szczecin, PolandAim: The goal of the work was comparing gas ultrasound images below the right diaphragm in two groups: in people with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm and ones with pneumoperitoneum and extracting the traits differentiating these two conditions. Material and methods: Retrospectively, the documentation of 22 patients with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm (group 1) was utilized. Clinical material was used for comparison, previously published, composed of 15 cases of pneumoperitoneum following laparotomy and of 14 cases following that symptom as a result of ulcer perforation – group 2 (in total n = 29). Moreover, the distance in millimeters of the gas surface reflecting ultrasounds from the parietal peritoneum was measured, the smoothness of the surface, parietal peritoneum enhancement at the place of gas adherence, gas continuity below the diaphragm with gas in the intestine located below the liver. Results: Direct adherence of the gas surface to the diaphragm was observed in 100% of the cases of emphysema, but in no cases of intestinal interposition. Yet, in the group of patients with colonic interposition (n = 21) there was always a small gap (2–3 mm) and the gas surface among those patients in 100% of the cases was uneven. Conclusions: In differentiation between pneumoperitoneum and liverdiaphragm interposition of the intestine one should take into account – apart from gas movement below the diaphragm at body position changing – the presence of protrusion and section enhancement of the diaphragmatic peritoneum as well as the distance of the gas from the diaphragm, the smoothness of its surface and the continuity with the intestine below the liver. Interpositions of small diaphragm-liver penetration may subside in erect position. http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-17-no-68/is-it-possible-to-differentiate-between-pseudopneumoperitoneum-and-similar-pathologies-ultrasonographically?aid=496gas below the diaphragmpneumoperitoneumintestinal interpositiondifferentiationultrasonography |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrzej Smereczyński Katarzyna Kołaczyk |
spellingShingle |
Andrzej Smereczyński Katarzyna Kołaczyk Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? Journal of Ultrasonography gas below the diaphragm pneumoperitoneum intestinal interposition differentiation ultrasonography |
author_facet |
Andrzej Smereczyński Katarzyna Kołaczyk |
author_sort |
Andrzej Smereczyński |
title |
Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? |
title_short |
Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? |
title_full |
Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? |
title_fullStr |
Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? |
title_sort |
is it possible to differentiate between pseudopneumoperitoneum and similar pathologies ultrasonographically? |
publisher |
Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. |
series |
Journal of Ultrasonography |
issn |
2084-8404 2451-070X |
publishDate |
2017-03-01 |
description |
Aim: The goal of the work was comparing gas ultrasound images below the right diaphragm in
two groups: in people with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm and ones with pneumoperitoneum
and extracting the traits differentiating these two conditions. Material and methods:
Retrospectively, the documentation of 22 patients with intestinal interposition below the diaphragm
(group 1) was utilized. Clinical material was used for comparison, previously published,
composed of 15 cases of pneumoperitoneum following laparotomy and of 14 cases following that
symptom as a result of ulcer perforation – group 2 (in total n = 29). Moreover, the distance in millimeters
of the gas surface reflecting ultrasounds from the parietal peritoneum was measured, the
smoothness of the surface, parietal peritoneum enhancement at the place of gas adherence, gas
continuity below the diaphragm with gas in the intestine located below the liver. Results: Direct
adherence of the gas surface to the diaphragm was observed in 100% of the cases of emphysema,
but in no cases of intestinal interposition. Yet, in the group of patients with colonic interposition
(n = 21) there was always a small gap (2–3 mm) and the gas surface among those patients in 100%
of the cases was uneven. Conclusions: In differentiation between pneumoperitoneum and liverdiaphragm
interposition of the intestine one should take into account – apart from gas movement
below the diaphragm at body position changing – the presence of protrusion and section enhancement
of the diaphragmatic peritoneum as well as the distance of the gas from the diaphragm, the
smoothness of its surface and the continuity with the intestine below the liver. Interpositions of
small diaphragm-liver penetration may subside in erect position. |
topic |
gas below the diaphragm pneumoperitoneum intestinal interposition differentiation ultrasonography |
url |
http://jultrason.pl/index.php/issues/volume-17-no-68/is-it-possible-to-differentiate-between-pseudopneumoperitoneum-and-similar-pathologies-ultrasonographically?aid=496 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andrzejsmereczynski isitpossibletodifferentiatebetweenpseudopneumoperitoneumandsimilarpathologiesultrasonographically AT katarzynakołaczyk isitpossibletodifferentiatebetweenpseudopneumoperitoneumandsimilarpathologiesultrasonographically |
_version_ |
1725731105401733120 |