The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions

In the current work, the objective is to determine the best efficiency point (BEP) of an axial fan using CFD. Analyzing the performance of the fan based upon the parameters chosen can lead to the optimal design of an axial flow fan for aerospace applications where the ambient pressure varies rapidly...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jose J Corona, Osama Mesalhy, Louis Chow, Quinn Leland, John P Kizito
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-03-01
Series:Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211001188
id doaj-4dd4b75da7224c61a4d6a59d458ff770
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4dd4b75da7224c61a4d6a59d458ff7702021-03-10T23:03:42ZengSAGE PublishingAdvances in Mechanical Engineering1687-81402021-03-011310.1177/16878140211001188The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditionsJose J Corona0Osama Mesalhy1Louis Chow2Quinn Leland3John P Kizito4North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USAZagazig University, Ash Sharqia Governorate, EgyptUniversity of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USAPower and Control Division, Aerospace Systems Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH, USANorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USAIn the current work, the objective is to determine the best efficiency point (BEP) of an axial fan using CFD. Analyzing the performance of the fan based upon the parameters chosen can lead to the optimal design of an axial flow fan for aerospace applications where the ambient pressure varies rapidly. The 2-bladed fan chosen for the study is the Propimax 2L which is considered the base fan used for comparison of all the results of the work. The set of parameters tested were fan rotational speed, ambient pressure conditions, blade count, and the airfoil design. All the performance measures were based on overall fan efficiency. The results yield the following: an increased rotational speed led to higher efficiencies, the most efficient ambient pressure of which the fan can perform is 0.7 atm, a 5-bladed fan configuration produced the highest efficiency, and airfoil selection is critical for fan efficiency enhancements. The results demonstrated that at 0.7 atm the fan efficiency is the highest due to the changes in power consumption to the density effect. A key finding in the work is that higher blade counts do not necessarily lead to higher performing axial fans. A high cambered airfoil provided a higher flow rate at free delivery than that of the Propimax 2L design, but the rotorcraft airfoil did not yield favorable results. The analysis is focused on the fan design of cooling of the electromechanical actuators (EMAs).https://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211001188
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jose J Corona
Osama Mesalhy
Louis Chow
Quinn Leland
John P Kizito
spellingShingle Jose J Corona
Osama Mesalhy
Louis Chow
Quinn Leland
John P Kizito
The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Jose J Corona
Osama Mesalhy
Louis Chow
Quinn Leland
John P Kizito
author_sort Jose J Corona
title The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions
title_short The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions
title_full The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions
title_fullStr The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions
title_full_unstemmed The best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions
title_sort best efficiency point of an axial fan at low-pressure conditions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Advances in Mechanical Engineering
issn 1687-8140
publishDate 2021-03-01
description In the current work, the objective is to determine the best efficiency point (BEP) of an axial fan using CFD. Analyzing the performance of the fan based upon the parameters chosen can lead to the optimal design of an axial flow fan for aerospace applications where the ambient pressure varies rapidly. The 2-bladed fan chosen for the study is the Propimax 2L which is considered the base fan used for comparison of all the results of the work. The set of parameters tested were fan rotational speed, ambient pressure conditions, blade count, and the airfoil design. All the performance measures were based on overall fan efficiency. The results yield the following: an increased rotational speed led to higher efficiencies, the most efficient ambient pressure of which the fan can perform is 0.7 atm, a 5-bladed fan configuration produced the highest efficiency, and airfoil selection is critical for fan efficiency enhancements. The results demonstrated that at 0.7 atm the fan efficiency is the highest due to the changes in power consumption to the density effect. A key finding in the work is that higher blade counts do not necessarily lead to higher performing axial fans. A high cambered airfoil provided a higher flow rate at free delivery than that of the Propimax 2L design, but the rotorcraft airfoil did not yield favorable results. The analysis is focused on the fan design of cooling of the electromechanical actuators (EMAs).
url https://doi.org/10.1177/16878140211001188
work_keys_str_mv AT josejcorona thebestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT osamamesalhy thebestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT louischow thebestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT quinnleland thebestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT johnpkizito thebestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT josejcorona bestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT osamamesalhy bestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT louischow bestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT quinnleland bestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
AT johnpkizito bestefficiencypointofanaxialfanatlowpressureconditions
_version_ 1724226453626683392