Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detection

Gene regulation modulates RNA expression via transcription factors. Post-transcriptional gene regulation in turn influences the amount of protein product through, for example, microRNAs (miRNAs). Experimental establishment of miRNAs and their effects is complicated and even futile when aiming to est...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Müşerref Duygu Saçar Demirci, Jens Allmer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2017-03-01
Series:PeerJ
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/3131.pdf
id doaj-4d9e49255cc54f8fa959310149d810e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d9e49255cc54f8fa959310149d810e02020-11-24T22:56:46ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ2167-83592017-03-015e313110.7717/peerj.3131Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detectionMüşerref Duygu Saçar Demirci0Jens Allmer1Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir, TurkeyDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Izmir Institute of Technology, Urla, Izmir, TurkeyGene regulation modulates RNA expression via transcription factors. Post-transcriptional gene regulation in turn influences the amount of protein product through, for example, microRNAs (miRNAs). Experimental establishment of miRNAs and their effects is complicated and even futile when aiming to establish the entirety of miRNA target interactions. Therefore, computational approaches have been proposed. Many such tools rely on machine learning (ML) which involves example selection, feature extraction, model training, algorithm selection, and parameter optimization. Different ML algorithms have been used for model training on various example sets, more than 1,000 features describing pre-miRNAs have been proposed and different training and testing schemes have been used for model establishment. For pre-miRNA detection, negative examples cannot easily be established causing a problem for two class classification algorithms. There is also no consensus on what ML approach works best and, therefore, we set forth and established the impact of the different parts involved in ML on model performance. Furthermore, we established two new negative datasets and analyzed the impact of using them for training and testing. It was our aim to attach an order of importance to the parts involved in ML for pre-miRNA detection, but instead we found that all parts are intricately connected and their contributions cannot be easily untangled leading us to suggest that when attempting ML-based pre-miRNA detection many scenarios need to be explored.https://peerj.com/articles/3131.pdfMicroRNAMachine learningFeature selectionNegative datasetML strategyAb initio pre-miRNA detection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Müşerref Duygu Saçar Demirci
Jens Allmer
spellingShingle Müşerref Duygu Saçar Demirci
Jens Allmer
Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detection
PeerJ
MicroRNA
Machine learning
Feature selection
Negative dataset
ML strategy
Ab initio pre-miRNA detection
author_facet Müşerref Duygu Saçar Demirci
Jens Allmer
author_sort Müşerref Duygu Saçar Demirci
title Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detection
title_short Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detection
title_full Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detection
title_fullStr Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detection
title_full_unstemmed Delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microRNA detection
title_sort delineating the impact of machine learning elements in pre-microrna detection
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ
issn 2167-8359
publishDate 2017-03-01
description Gene regulation modulates RNA expression via transcription factors. Post-transcriptional gene regulation in turn influences the amount of protein product through, for example, microRNAs (miRNAs). Experimental establishment of miRNAs and their effects is complicated and even futile when aiming to establish the entirety of miRNA target interactions. Therefore, computational approaches have been proposed. Many such tools rely on machine learning (ML) which involves example selection, feature extraction, model training, algorithm selection, and parameter optimization. Different ML algorithms have been used for model training on various example sets, more than 1,000 features describing pre-miRNAs have been proposed and different training and testing schemes have been used for model establishment. For pre-miRNA detection, negative examples cannot easily be established causing a problem for two class classification algorithms. There is also no consensus on what ML approach works best and, therefore, we set forth and established the impact of the different parts involved in ML on model performance. Furthermore, we established two new negative datasets and analyzed the impact of using them for training and testing. It was our aim to attach an order of importance to the parts involved in ML for pre-miRNA detection, but instead we found that all parts are intricately connected and their contributions cannot be easily untangled leading us to suggest that when attempting ML-based pre-miRNA detection many scenarios need to be explored.
topic MicroRNA
Machine learning
Feature selection
Negative dataset
ML strategy
Ab initio pre-miRNA detection
url https://peerj.com/articles/3131.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT muserrefduygusacardemirci delineatingtheimpactofmachinelearningelementsinpremicrornadetection
AT jensallmer delineatingtheimpactofmachinelearningelementsinpremicrornadetection
_version_ 1725653471618662400