Systemic reaction to and interference with urine protein measurements after intravenous fluorescein injection

• Main Authors: Annemieke Clementine Bouman, Damaris de Kruijf, Judith Maria Antonia Emmen, Thijs Clemens David Rettig, Maria Jolande Charlotte Kooijman-de Groot, Miriam Christina Faes
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 2019-12-01
• Series: BMC Ophthalmology
• Subjects: Fluorescein angiography; Anaphylactic reaction; Interference; Laboratory analyses; Urinalysis
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-019-1276-x

Abstract Background Fluorescein angiography is an important and frequently used diagnostic tool in ophthalmological practice. In this case report we describe a patient who experienced an anaphylactic reaction after the injection of fluorescein. Furthermore, we report an interference with laboratory testing by fluorescein in this patient and summarize the literature on this topic. Case presentation An 86-year old Caucasian woman undergoing fluorescein angiography due to suspected peripapillary neovascularizations collapsed after the injection of fluorescein. The patient developed an anaphylactic reaction. With fluid resuscitation and oxygen therapy, the patient regained consciousness after a few minutes. The patient was admitted to the geriatric ward for observation, and routine blood and urine tests were performed. Urine protein concentration appeared to be falsely increased as a consequence of disturbance of the laboratory analysis by the presence of fluorescein. Conclusions Serious complications can occur with fluorescein angiography, such as an anaphylactic reaction. In the case of anaphylaxis appropriate supportive measures including the use of oxygen and epinephrine (e.g. EpiPen), should be available to prevent morbidity and mortality from this test. Furthermore, these potential complications should be taken into consideration when choosing the healthcare setting for fluorescein angiography, such as the immediate availability of an acute medical team. Several studies have demonstrated the interference of laboratory analyses by fluorescein. The majority of these studies were published 10 to 30 years ago. By presenting this case, the authors hope to bring renewed attention to this phenomenon among clinicians, as falsely increased or decreased laboratory values can result in unnecessary diagnostics and/or therapy.