Influence of reservoir geology on seismic response during decameter-scale hydraulic stimulations in crystalline rock

• Main Authors: L. Villiger, V. S. Gischig, J. Doetsch, H. Krietsch, N. O. Dutler, M. Jalali, B. Valley, P. A. Selvadurai, A. Mignan, K. Plenkers, D. Giardini, F. Amann, S. Wiemer
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Copernicus Publications 2020-04-01
• Series: Solid Earth
• Online Access: https://www.solid-earth.net/11/627/2020/se-11-627-2020.pdf
• ISSN: 1869-9510; 1869-9529

<p>We performed a series of 12 hydraulic stimulation experiments in a <span class="inline-formula"><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1" display="inline" overflow="scroll" dspmath="mathml"><mrow><mn mathvariant="normal">20</mn><mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></mrow><mo>×</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">20</mn><mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></mrow><mo>×</mo><mn mathvariant="normal">20</mn><mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mrow class="unit"><mi mathvariant="normal">m</mi></mrow></mrow></math><span><svg:svg xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" width="93pt" height="10pt" class="svg-formula" dspmath="mathimg" md5hash="cc6218395fd608fed1ade5a79046019a"><svg:image xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="se-11-627-2020-ie00001.svg" width="93pt" height="10pt" src="se-11-627-2020-ie00001.png"/></svg:svg></span></span> foliated, crystalline rock volume intersected by two distinct fault sets at the Grimsel Test Site, Switzerland. The goal of these experiments was to improve our understanding of stimulation processes associated with high-pressure fluid injection used for reservoir creation in enhanced or engineered geothermal systems. In the first six experiments, pre-existing fractures were stimulated to induce shear dilation and enhance permeability. Two types of shear zones were targeted for these hydroshearing experiments: (i) ductile ones with intense foliation and (ii) brittle–ductile ones associated with a fractured zone. The second series of six stimulations were performed in borehole intervals without natural fractures to initiate and propagate hydraulic fractures that connect the wellbore to the existing fracture network. The same injection protocol was used for all experiments within each stimulation series so that the differences observed will give insights into the effect of geology on the seismo-hydromechanical response rather than differences due to the injection protocols. Deformations and fluid pressure were monitored using a dense sensor network in boreholes surrounding the injection locations. Seismicity was recorded with sensitive in situ acoustic emission sensors both in boreholes and at the tunnel walls. We observed high variability in the seismic response in terms of seismogenic indices, <span class="inline-formula"><i>b</i></span> values, and spatial and temporal evolution during both hydroshearing and hydrofracturing experiments, which we attribute to local geological heterogeneities. Seismicity was most pronounced for injections into the highly conductive brittle–ductile shear zones, while the injectivity increase on these structures was only marginal. No significant differences between the seismic response of hydroshearing and hydrofracturing was identified, possibly because the hydrofractures interact with the same pre-existing fracture network that is reactivated during the hydroshearing experiments. Fault slip during the hydroshearing experiments was predominantly aseismic. The results of our hydraulic stimulations indicate that stimulation of short borehole intervals with limited fluid volumes (i.e., the concept of zonal insulation) may be an effective approach to limit induced seismic hazard if highly seismogenic structures can be avoided.</p>