Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and Productivity

Abstract The considerable interest in detecting global vegetation changes based on satellite observations is increasing. However, studies rely on single indices to explore the driving mechanisms of the greening trend might exacerbate uncertainties of global ecosystem change. Thus, vegetation growth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zihan Ding, Jian Peng, Sijing Qiu, Yan Zhao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-10-01
Series:Earth's Future
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001618
id doaj-4d977ff3aff74376a80486904708a36b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d977ff3aff74376a80486904708a36b2021-06-09T21:33:47ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth's Future2328-42772020-10-01810n/an/a10.1029/2020EF001618Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and ProductivityZihan Ding0Jian Peng1Sijing Qiu2Yan Zhao3Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences Peking University Beijing ChinaLaboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences Peking University Beijing ChinaLaboratory for Earth Surface Processes, Ministry of Education, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences Peking University Beijing ChinaKey Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ChinaAbstract The considerable interest in detecting global vegetation changes based on satellite observations is increasing. However, studies rely on single indices to explore the driving mechanisms of the greening trend might exacerbate uncertainties of global ecosystem change. Thus, vegetation growth dynamics from various biophysical properties required to be monitored comprehensively. In this study, a consistent framework for evaluating vegetation growth trends was developed based on five widely used satellite‐derived products of MODIS Collection 6; the consistency in vegetation growth was mapped; and the factors that affected the consistency of vegetation growth were explored. The results showed that, during 2000‐2015, 45.6% of global vegetated area experienced inconsistent trends in vegetation greenness, cover and productivity, especially in evergreen broadleaf forests, grasslands, open shrublands, woody savannas and croplands. Only 5.4% of global vegetated area exhibited simultaneous trends in greenness, cover and productivity, and the inconsistent areas were expanding in the study period. Contradictory vegetation changes were mainly reflected in the opposite trends of vegetation greenness and productivity in evergreen broadleaf forests. Moreover, the inconsistency change was mainly manifested in the greenness‐dominated vegetation enhancement, without enhanced productivity. The increment difference between NPP and GPP also showed respiration losses greatly offset the effect of vegetation greenness or cover on productivity. This study provides integrated insights for understanding the inconsistency of vegetation structural and functional changes in the context of global greening.https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001618global vegetation growthinconsistent trendvegetation greennessvegetation covervegetation productivity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zihan Ding
Jian Peng
Sijing Qiu
Yan Zhao
spellingShingle Zihan Ding
Jian Peng
Sijing Qiu
Yan Zhao
Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and Productivity
Earth's Future
global vegetation growth
inconsistent trend
vegetation greenness
vegetation cover
vegetation productivity
author_facet Zihan Ding
Jian Peng
Sijing Qiu
Yan Zhao
author_sort Zihan Ding
title Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and Productivity
title_short Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and Productivity
title_full Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and Productivity
title_fullStr Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and Productivity
title_full_unstemmed Nearly Half of Global Vegetated Area Experienced Inconsistent Vegetation Growth in Terms of Greenness, Cover, and Productivity
title_sort nearly half of global vegetated area experienced inconsistent vegetation growth in terms of greenness, cover, and productivity
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Earth's Future
issn 2328-4277
publishDate 2020-10-01
description Abstract The considerable interest in detecting global vegetation changes based on satellite observations is increasing. However, studies rely on single indices to explore the driving mechanisms of the greening trend might exacerbate uncertainties of global ecosystem change. Thus, vegetation growth dynamics from various biophysical properties required to be monitored comprehensively. In this study, a consistent framework for evaluating vegetation growth trends was developed based on five widely used satellite‐derived products of MODIS Collection 6; the consistency in vegetation growth was mapped; and the factors that affected the consistency of vegetation growth were explored. The results showed that, during 2000‐2015, 45.6% of global vegetated area experienced inconsistent trends in vegetation greenness, cover and productivity, especially in evergreen broadleaf forests, grasslands, open shrublands, woody savannas and croplands. Only 5.4% of global vegetated area exhibited simultaneous trends in greenness, cover and productivity, and the inconsistent areas were expanding in the study period. Contradictory vegetation changes were mainly reflected in the opposite trends of vegetation greenness and productivity in evergreen broadleaf forests. Moreover, the inconsistency change was mainly manifested in the greenness‐dominated vegetation enhancement, without enhanced productivity. The increment difference between NPP and GPP also showed respiration losses greatly offset the effect of vegetation greenness or cover on productivity. This study provides integrated insights for understanding the inconsistency of vegetation structural and functional changes in the context of global greening.
topic global vegetation growth
inconsistent trend
vegetation greenness
vegetation cover
vegetation productivity
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001618
work_keys_str_mv AT zihanding nearlyhalfofglobalvegetatedareaexperiencedinconsistentvegetationgrowthintermsofgreennesscoverandproductivity
AT jianpeng nearlyhalfofglobalvegetatedareaexperiencedinconsistentvegetationgrowthintermsofgreennesscoverandproductivity
AT sijingqiu nearlyhalfofglobalvegetatedareaexperiencedinconsistentvegetationgrowthintermsofgreennesscoverandproductivity
AT yanzhao nearlyhalfofglobalvegetatedareaexperiencedinconsistentvegetationgrowthintermsofgreennesscoverandproductivity
_version_ 1721386499819175936