Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation

• Main Authors: Sergio Alexandre Gehrke, José Henrique Cavalcanti de Lima, Fernando Rodriguez, José Luis Calvo-Guirado, Jaime Aramburú Júnior, Leticia Pérez-Díaz, Patricia Mazón, Juan Manuel Aragoneses, Piedad N. De Aza
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
• Series: Materials
• Subjects: dental implants; osseointegration; bone healing; surface treatment; microgrooves
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/8/1287

The physical characteristics of an implant surface can determine and/or facilitate osseointegration processes. In this sense, a new implant surface with microgrooves associated with plus double acid treatment to generate roughness was evaluated and compared in vitro and in vivo with a non-treated (smooth) and double acid surface treatment. Thirty disks and thirty-six conical implants manufactured from commercially pure titanium (grade IV) were prepared for this study. Three groups were determined, as described below: Group 1 (G1), where the samples were only machined; group 2 (G2), where the samples were machined and had their surface treated to generate roughness; and test group 3 (G3), where the samples were machined with microgrooves and the surface was treated to generate the roughness. For the in vitro analysis, the samples were submitted to scanning microscopy (SEM), surface profilometry, the atomic force microscope (MFA) and the surface energy test. For the in vivo analyses, thirty-six implants were placed in the tibia of 9 New Zealand rabbits in a randomized manner, after histological and histomorphometric analysis, to determine the level of contact between the bone and implant (BIC%) and the bone area fraction occupancy (BAFO%) inside of the threads. The data collected were statistically analyzed between groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The in vitro evaluations showed different roughness patterns between the groups, and the G3 group had the highest values. In vivo evaluations of the BIC% showed 50.45 &#177; 9.57% for the G1 group, 55.32 &#177; 10.31% for the G2 group and 68.65 &#177; 9.98% for the G3 group, with significant statistical difference between the groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). In the BAFO% values, the G1 group presented 54.97 &#177; 9.56%, the G2 group 59.09 &#177; 10.13% and the G3 group 70.12 &#177; 11.07%, with statistical difference between the groups (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The results obtained in the evaluations show that the surface with microgrooves stimulates the process of osseointegration, accelerating the healing process, increasing the contact between the bone and the implant and the area of new bone formation.