P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS

Background: Although arterial stiffness is of clinical interest, data on the elastic modulus of the human aortic wall are scarce. The aim of this work is to directly measure the elastic modulus of human aorta ex vivo. Methods: Using a standard tensiometer, we measured the elastic modulus (E) of hum...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kathleen Connolly*, Ashraf Khir, Ye Li, Yasmin Yasmin, Ian Wilkinson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Atlantis Press 2015-11-01
Series:Artery Research
Online Access:https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930693/view
id doaj-4d7ca37a152444e8900231cead87ef54
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d7ca37a152444e8900231cead87ef542020-11-25T02:53:44ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012015-11-011210.1016/j.artres.2015.10.336P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESSKathleen Connolly*Ashraf KhirYe LiYasmin YasminIan WilkinsonBackground: Although arterial stiffness is of clinical interest, data on the elastic modulus of the human aortic wall are scarce. The aim of this work is to directly measure the elastic modulus of human aorta ex vivo. Methods: Using a standard tensiometer, we measured the elastic modulus (E) of human aortic rings (n=205). Wall thickness and diameter were measured, and the pulse wave velocity (PWV) for each aorta was calculated using Moens-Kortweg equations. The results were analysed based on age, gender and aortic site, then compared with data obtained in living subjects using MRI (n=160). Results: At 100mmHg pressure, E of aortic rings increased with age, with a commiserate increase in PWV: under 30 years = 3.73±0.49; 30–39 years = 3.32±0.58; 40–49 years = 3.32±0.49; 50–59 years = 3.55±1.00; 60–69 years = 4.05±1.21; 70–79 years = 4.52±1.26; 80–89 years=5.59±0.39 m/s. There was no significant difference in either E or PWV between genders. There was also no significant difference in E or PWV based on aortic site, likely due to under-representation of most sites. PWV measured in vivo using MRI was higher every age: under 30 years = 3.96±0.51; 30–39 years = 4.47±0.61; 40–49 years = 4.85±0.75; 50–59 years = 5.97±1.14; 60–69 years = 6.64±1,16; 70–79 years = 9.40±4.24 m/s. The difference between in vivo and ex vivo measurements increased with age. Conclusions: PWV calculated from ex vivo E measurements reflect established physiological patterns, suggesting that direct elastic modulus measurement may be an acceptable method for analysing stiffness in aortic tissue.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930693/view
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kathleen Connolly*
Ashraf Khir
Ye Li
Yasmin Yasmin
Ian Wilkinson
spellingShingle Kathleen Connolly*
Ashraf Khir
Ye Li
Yasmin Yasmin
Ian Wilkinson
P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS
Artery Research
author_facet Kathleen Connolly*
Ashraf Khir
Ye Li
Yasmin Yasmin
Ian Wilkinson
author_sort Kathleen Connolly*
title P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS
title_short P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS
title_full P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS
title_fullStr P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS
title_full_unstemmed P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS
title_sort p8.14 elastic modulus of human aortas as a measure of stiffness
publisher Atlantis Press
series Artery Research
issn 1876-4401
publishDate 2015-11-01
description Background: Although arterial stiffness is of clinical interest, data on the elastic modulus of the human aortic wall are scarce. The aim of this work is to directly measure the elastic modulus of human aorta ex vivo. Methods: Using a standard tensiometer, we measured the elastic modulus (E) of human aortic rings (n=205). Wall thickness and diameter were measured, and the pulse wave velocity (PWV) for each aorta was calculated using Moens-Kortweg equations. The results were analysed based on age, gender and aortic site, then compared with data obtained in living subjects using MRI (n=160). Results: At 100mmHg pressure, E of aortic rings increased with age, with a commiserate increase in PWV: under 30 years = 3.73±0.49; 30–39 years = 3.32±0.58; 40–49 years = 3.32±0.49; 50–59 years = 3.55±1.00; 60–69 years = 4.05±1.21; 70–79 years = 4.52±1.26; 80–89 years=5.59±0.39 m/s. There was no significant difference in either E or PWV between genders. There was also no significant difference in E or PWV based on aortic site, likely due to under-representation of most sites. PWV measured in vivo using MRI was higher every age: under 30 years = 3.96±0.51; 30–39 years = 4.47±0.61; 40–49 years = 4.85±0.75; 50–59 years = 5.97±1.14; 60–69 years = 6.64±1,16; 70–79 years = 9.40±4.24 m/s. The difference between in vivo and ex vivo measurements increased with age. Conclusions: PWV calculated from ex vivo E measurements reflect established physiological patterns, suggesting that direct elastic modulus measurement may be an acceptable method for analysing stiffness in aortic tissue.
url https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930693/view
work_keys_str_mv AT kathleenconnolly p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness
AT ashrafkhir p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness
AT yeli p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness
AT yasminyasmin p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness
AT ianwilkinson p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness
_version_ 1724724850821431296