P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS
Background: Although arterial stiffness is of clinical interest, data on the elastic modulus of the human aortic wall are scarce. The aim of this work is to directly measure the elastic modulus of human aorta ex vivo. Methods: Using a standard tensiometer, we measured the elastic modulus (E) of hum...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Atlantis Press
2015-11-01
|
Series: | Artery Research |
Online Access: | https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930693/view |
id |
doaj-4d7ca37a152444e8900231cead87ef54 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4d7ca37a152444e8900231cead87ef542020-11-25T02:53:44ZengAtlantis PressArtery Research 1876-44012015-11-011210.1016/j.artres.2015.10.336P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESSKathleen Connolly*Ashraf KhirYe LiYasmin YasminIan WilkinsonBackground: Although arterial stiffness is of clinical interest, data on the elastic modulus of the human aortic wall are scarce. The aim of this work is to directly measure the elastic modulus of human aorta ex vivo. Methods: Using a standard tensiometer, we measured the elastic modulus (E) of human aortic rings (n=205). Wall thickness and diameter were measured, and the pulse wave velocity (PWV) for each aorta was calculated using Moens-Kortweg equations. The results were analysed based on age, gender and aortic site, then compared with data obtained in living subjects using MRI (n=160). Results: At 100mmHg pressure, E of aortic rings increased with age, with a commiserate increase in PWV: under 30 years = 3.73±0.49; 30–39 years = 3.32±0.58; 40–49 years = 3.32±0.49; 50–59 years = 3.55±1.00; 60–69 years = 4.05±1.21; 70–79 years = 4.52±1.26; 80–89 years=5.59±0.39 m/s. There was no significant difference in either E or PWV between genders. There was also no significant difference in E or PWV based on aortic site, likely due to under-representation of most sites. PWV measured in vivo using MRI was higher every age: under 30 years = 3.96±0.51; 30–39 years = 4.47±0.61; 40–49 years = 4.85±0.75; 50–59 years = 5.97±1.14; 60–69 years = 6.64±1,16; 70–79 years = 9.40±4.24 m/s. The difference between in vivo and ex vivo measurements increased with age. Conclusions: PWV calculated from ex vivo E measurements reflect established physiological patterns, suggesting that direct elastic modulus measurement may be an acceptable method for analysing stiffness in aortic tissue.https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930693/view |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kathleen Connolly* Ashraf Khir Ye Li Yasmin Yasmin Ian Wilkinson |
spellingShingle |
Kathleen Connolly* Ashraf Khir Ye Li Yasmin Yasmin Ian Wilkinson P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS Artery Research |
author_facet |
Kathleen Connolly* Ashraf Khir Ye Li Yasmin Yasmin Ian Wilkinson |
author_sort |
Kathleen Connolly* |
title |
P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS |
title_short |
P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS |
title_full |
P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS |
title_fullStr |
P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS |
title_full_unstemmed |
P8.14 ELASTIC MODULUS OF HUMAN AORTAS AS A MEASURE OF STIFFNESS |
title_sort |
p8.14 elastic modulus of human aortas as a measure of stiffness |
publisher |
Atlantis Press |
series |
Artery Research |
issn |
1876-4401 |
publishDate |
2015-11-01 |
description |
Background: Although arterial stiffness is of clinical interest, data on the elastic modulus of the human aortic wall are scarce. The aim of this work is to directly measure the elastic modulus of human aorta ex vivo.
Methods: Using a standard tensiometer, we measured the elastic modulus (E) of human aortic rings (n=205). Wall thickness and diameter were measured, and the pulse wave velocity (PWV) for each aorta was calculated using Moens-Kortweg equations. The results were analysed based on age, gender and aortic site, then compared with data obtained in living subjects using MRI (n=160).
Results: At 100mmHg pressure, E of aortic rings increased with age, with a commiserate increase in PWV: under 30 years = 3.73±0.49; 30–39 years = 3.32±0.58; 40–49 years = 3.32±0.49; 50–59 years = 3.55±1.00; 60–69 years = 4.05±1.21; 70–79 years = 4.52±1.26; 80–89 years=5.59±0.39 m/s. There was no significant difference in either E or PWV between genders. There was also no significant difference in E or PWV based on aortic site, likely due to under-representation of most sites.
PWV measured in vivo using MRI was higher every age: under 30 years = 3.96±0.51; 30–39 years = 4.47±0.61; 40–49 years = 4.85±0.75; 50–59 years = 5.97±1.14; 60–69 years = 6.64±1,16; 70–79 years = 9.40±4.24 m/s. The difference between in vivo and ex vivo measurements increased with age.
Conclusions: PWV calculated from ex vivo E measurements reflect established physiological patterns, suggesting that direct elastic modulus measurement may be an acceptable method for analysing stiffness in aortic tissue. |
url |
https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/125930693/view |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kathleenconnolly p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness AT ashrafkhir p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness AT yeli p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness AT yasminyasmin p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness AT ianwilkinson p814elasticmodulusofhumanaortasasameasureofstiffness |
_version_ |
1724724850821431296 |