Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?
Sustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2013-12-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/1/18 |
id |
doaj-4d75d3afe46f45feb6f8d3034daab185 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4d75d3afe46f45feb6f8d3034daab1852020-11-24T20:54:17ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502013-12-0161184910.3390/su6010018su6010018Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?Diana Tuomasjukka0Staffan Berg1Marcus Lindner2European Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6, Joensuu 80100, FinlandSkogforsk, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala 75183, SwedenEuropean Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6, Joensuu 80100, FinlandSustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available instruments brings confusion in practice, where companies, consumers and investors meet legal and different voluntary regulatory and non-regulatory instruments. The practical suitability and covered sustainability dimension for each instrument is reviewed with an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, actors and purposes for assessing different aspects of sustainability. Each of them is compared against the other in an overview about which sustainability dimensions they cover (workplace, human rights, community, market place, environment, economy). Results highlight covered, overlapping and missing aspects for each approach and how they can support or reinforce each other. Special attention is given to current approaches in impact assessment, particularly on their areas of application (companies, NGOs, products, operations, production practices, etc.), and recommendations for supplementing it with sustainability impact assessment.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/1/18sustainabilityCSRlegal instrumentsvoluntary instrumentscertificationSIAISOFSCLCA |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Diana Tuomasjukka Staffan Berg Marcus Lindner |
spellingShingle |
Diana Tuomasjukka Staffan Berg Marcus Lindner Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose? Sustainability sustainability CSR legal instruments voluntary instruments certification SIA ISO FSC LCA |
author_facet |
Diana Tuomasjukka Staffan Berg Marcus Lindner |
author_sort |
Diana Tuomasjukka |
title |
Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose? |
title_short |
Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose? |
title_full |
Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose? |
title_fullStr |
Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose? |
title_sort |
managing sustainability of fennoscandian forests and their use by law and/or agreement: for whom and which purpose? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
Sustainability and sustainable behaviour is of crucial importance in the management of Fennoscandian forests and forest-related industries. This paper reviews a number of voluntary instruments, which aim at promoting or assessing sustainability impacts at different levels. The multitude of available instruments brings confusion in practice, where companies, consumers and investors meet legal and different voluntary regulatory and non-regulatory instruments. The practical suitability and covered sustainability dimension for each instrument is reviewed with an analysis of strengths, weaknesses, actors and purposes for assessing different aspects of sustainability. Each of them is compared against the other in an overview about which sustainability dimensions they cover (workplace, human rights, community, market place, environment, economy). Results highlight covered, overlapping and missing aspects for each approach and how they can support or reinforce each other. Special attention is given to current approaches in impact assessment, particularly on their areas of application (companies, NGOs, products, operations, production practices, etc.), and recommendations for supplementing it with sustainability impact assessment. |
topic |
sustainability CSR legal instruments voluntary instruments certification SIA ISO FSC LCA |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/1/18 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dianatuomasjukka managingsustainabilityoffennoscandianforestsandtheirusebylawandoragreementforwhomandwhichpurpose AT staffanberg managingsustainabilityoffennoscandianforestsandtheirusebylawandoragreementforwhomandwhichpurpose AT marcuslindner managingsustainabilityoffennoscandianforestsandtheirusebylawandoragreementforwhomandwhichpurpose |
_version_ |
1716795029138178048 |