University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity

In this article a preliminary description of the Academic PUCV-2010 Corpus is given, in which an account of the reading materials of doctoral students in Biotechnology, Chemistry, Physics, Linguistics, Literature, and History (3,160 texts) is presented. The corpus was collected in twelve PhD program...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Giovanni Parodi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística 2013-03-01
Series:Fórum Linguístico
Subjects:
Online Access:https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/forum/article/view/27148
id doaj-4d57d3d106184b26bbc048e589e30497
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d57d3d106184b26bbc048e589e304972020-11-25T01:27:46ZengUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-graduação em LinguísticaFórum Linguístico1415-86981984-84122013-03-019425928210.5007/1984-8412.2012v9n4p25919817University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarityGiovanni Parodi0Pontificia Universidad Católica de ValparaísoIn this article a preliminary description of the Academic PUCV-2010 Corpus is given, in which an account of the reading materials of doctoral students in Biotechnology, Chemistry, Physics, Linguistics, Literature, and History (3,160 texts) is presented. The corpus was collected in twelve PhD programs in six Chilean universities and comprises all the documents students were given to read during their formal curricula, with the exception of those included in the final doctoral research. In the analysis of the 33% of the corpus (1,043 texts), nine multisemiotic artifacts were identified and a quantification of their occurrence across disciplines was determined. Interesting distinctions emerged, based on how in the texts from the six disciplines meanings are constructed. The main empirical findings reveal differences in: a) the number of circulating texts in each discipline and knowledge domain (more empirical sciences versus more theoretical sciences), b) the dominating language in the reading materials (English and Spanish), c) the relationship between discipline and multisemiotic artifacts, c) the predominance of verbal system in Social Sciences and Humanities texts over the mathematic, graphic and typographic in Basic Sciences texts.https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/forum/article/view/27148multisemiotic artifactsdisciplineswritten genres.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giovanni Parodi
spellingShingle Giovanni Parodi
University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity
Fórum Linguístico
multisemiotic artifacts
disciplines
written genres.
author_facet Giovanni Parodi
author_sort Giovanni Parodi
title University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity
title_short University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity
title_full University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity
title_fullStr University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity
title_full_unstemmed University genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity
title_sort university genres and multisemiotic features: accessing specialized knowledge through disciplinarity
publisher Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Programa de Pós-graduação em Linguística
series Fórum Linguístico
issn 1415-8698
1984-8412
publishDate 2013-03-01
description In this article a preliminary description of the Academic PUCV-2010 Corpus is given, in which an account of the reading materials of doctoral students in Biotechnology, Chemistry, Physics, Linguistics, Literature, and History (3,160 texts) is presented. The corpus was collected in twelve PhD programs in six Chilean universities and comprises all the documents students were given to read during their formal curricula, with the exception of those included in the final doctoral research. In the analysis of the 33% of the corpus (1,043 texts), nine multisemiotic artifacts were identified and a quantification of their occurrence across disciplines was determined. Interesting distinctions emerged, based on how in the texts from the six disciplines meanings are constructed. The main empirical findings reveal differences in: a) the number of circulating texts in each discipline and knowledge domain (more empirical sciences versus more theoretical sciences), b) the dominating language in the reading materials (English and Spanish), c) the relationship between discipline and multisemiotic artifacts, c) the predominance of verbal system in Social Sciences and Humanities texts over the mathematic, graphic and typographic in Basic Sciences texts.
topic multisemiotic artifacts
disciplines
written genres.
url https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/forum/article/view/27148
work_keys_str_mv AT giovanniparodi universitygenresandmultisemioticfeaturesaccessingspecializedknowledgethroughdisciplinarity
_version_ 1725103468147900416