Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review

Objectives: The purpose of the present study is to systematically review the accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide and to find out what factors can influence the accuracy. Material and Methods: An electronic literature search was performed through t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheongbeom Seo, Gintaras Juodzbalys
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stilus Optimus 2018-03-01
Series:eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2018/1/e1/v9n1e1ht.htm
id doaj-4d54776429914fbcb41a916a31b8dfcd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d54776429914fbcb41a916a31b8dfcd2020-11-24T21:32:07ZengStilus OptimuseJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research2029-283X2018-03-0191e110.5037/jomr.2018.9101Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic ReviewCheongbeom SeoGintaras JuodzbalysObjectives: The purpose of the present study is to systematically review the accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide and to find out what factors can influence the accuracy. Material and Methods: An electronic literature search was performed through the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases. The articles are including human studies published in English from October 2008 to October, 2017. From the examination of selected articles, deviations between virtual planning and actual implant placement were analysed regarding the global apical, global coronal, and angulation position. Results: A total of 119 articles were reviewed, and 6 of the most relevant articles that are suitable to the criteria were selected. The present data included 572 implants and 93 patients. The result in the present systematic review shows that mean apical global deviation ranges from 0.67 (SD 0.34) mm to 2.19 (SD 0.83) mm, mean coronal global deviation ranges from 0.6 (SD 0.25) mm to 1.68 (SD 0.25) mm and mean angular deviation - from 2.6° (SD 1.61°) to 4.67° (SD 2.68°). Conclusions: It’s clearly shown from most of the examined studies that the mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide, showed not exceeding in apically 2.19 mm, in coronally 1.68 mm and in angular deviation 4.67°. Surgeons should be aware of the possible linear and angular deviations of the system. Accuracy can be influenced by bone density, mucosal thickness, surgical techniques, type of jaw, smoking habits and implant length. Further studies should be performed in order to find out which jaw can have better accuracy and how the experience can influence the accuracy.http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2018/1/e1/v9n1e1ht.htmcomputer-assisted surgerydental implantedentulous jawosseointegrationreview
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheongbeom Seo
Gintaras Juodzbalys
spellingShingle Cheongbeom Seo
Gintaras Juodzbalys
Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review
eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
computer-assisted surgery
dental implant
edentulous jaw
osseointegration
review
author_facet Cheongbeom Seo
Gintaras Juodzbalys
author_sort Cheongbeom Seo
title Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review
title_short Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review
title_full Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of Guided Surgery via Stereolithographic Mucosa-Supported Surgical Guide in Implant Surgery for Edentulous Patient: a Systematic Review
title_sort accuracy of guided surgery via stereolithographic mucosa-supported surgical guide in implant surgery for edentulous patient: a systematic review
publisher Stilus Optimus
series eJournal of Oral Maxillofacial Research
issn 2029-283X
publishDate 2018-03-01
description Objectives: The purpose of the present study is to systematically review the accuracy of implant placement with mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide and to find out what factors can influence the accuracy. Material and Methods: An electronic literature search was performed through the MEDLINE (PubMed) and EMBASE databases. The articles are including human studies published in English from October 2008 to October, 2017. From the examination of selected articles, deviations between virtual planning and actual implant placement were analysed regarding the global apical, global coronal, and angulation position. Results: A total of 119 articles were reviewed, and 6 of the most relevant articles that are suitable to the criteria were selected. The present data included 572 implants and 93 patients. The result in the present systematic review shows that mean apical global deviation ranges from 0.67 (SD 0.34) mm to 2.19 (SD 0.83) mm, mean coronal global deviation ranges from 0.6 (SD 0.25) mm to 1.68 (SD 0.25) mm and mean angular deviation - from 2.6° (SD 1.61°) to 4.67° (SD 2.68°). Conclusions: It’s clearly shown from most of the examined studies that the mucosa-supported stereolithographic surgical guide, showed not exceeding in apically 2.19 mm, in coronally 1.68 mm and in angular deviation 4.67°. Surgeons should be aware of the possible linear and angular deviations of the system. Accuracy can be influenced by bone density, mucosal thickness, surgical techniques, type of jaw, smoking habits and implant length. Further studies should be performed in order to find out which jaw can have better accuracy and how the experience can influence the accuracy.
topic computer-assisted surgery
dental implant
edentulous jaw
osseointegration
review
url http://www.ejomr.org/JOMR/archives/2018/1/e1/v9n1e1ht.htm
work_keys_str_mv AT cheongbeomseo accuracyofguidedsurgeryviastereolithographicmucosasupportedsurgicalguideinimplantsurgeryforedentulouspatientasystematicreview
AT gintarasjuodzbalys accuracyofguidedsurgeryviastereolithographicmucosasupportedsurgicalguideinimplantsurgeryforedentulouspatientasystematicreview
_version_ 1725958566143066112