Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance
A shift appears to be occurring in thinking about flooding, from a resistance-based approach to one of resilience. Accordingly, how stakeholders in flood-prone regions perceive the system and its governance are salient questions. This study queried stakeholders’ internal representations of ecosystem...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2016-05-01
|
Series: | Water |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/5/191 |
id |
doaj-4d3c9d907f8848bdbefc4999d49a7fe4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4d3c9d907f8848bdbefc4999d49a7fe42020-11-24T20:45:51ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412016-05-018519110.3390/w8050191w8050191Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for GovernanceJulia Baird0Angela Dzyundzyak1Ryan Plummer2Ryan Bullock3Diane Dupont4Marilyne Jollineau5Wendee Kubik6Gary Pickering7Liette Vasseur8Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Studies and Sciences, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaA shift appears to be occurring in thinking about flooding, from a resistance-based approach to one of resilience. Accordingly, how stakeholders in flood-prone regions perceive the system and its governance are salient questions. This study queried stakeholders’ internal representations of ecosystems (resistance- or resilience-based), preferences for governance actors and mechanisms for flooding, and the relationship between them in five different regions of the world. The influence of personal experience on these variables was also assessed. Most respondents aligned themselves with a resilience-based approach in relation to system connectedness and response to disturbance; however, respondents were almost evenly split between resistance- and resilience-based approaches when considering system management. Responses generally were considered to hold for other disturbances as well. There was no clear relationship between internal representations and preferences for governance actors or mechanisms. Respondents generally favoured actor combinations that included governments and mechanism combinations that included regulations and policies. Those who had personal experience with flooding tended to align themselves with a resilience-based internal representation of system management, but personal experience showed no clear relationship with governance preferences. The findings support an evolutionary perspective of flood management where emerging paradigms enhance preceding ones, and prompt a critical discussion about the universality of resilience as a framing construct.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/5/191ecosystem perceptionfloodinggovernanceresilience |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julia Baird Angela Dzyundzyak Ryan Plummer Ryan Bullock Diane Dupont Marilyne Jollineau Wendee Kubik Gary Pickering Liette Vasseur |
spellingShingle |
Julia Baird Angela Dzyundzyak Ryan Plummer Ryan Bullock Diane Dupont Marilyne Jollineau Wendee Kubik Gary Pickering Liette Vasseur Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance Water ecosystem perception flooding governance resilience |
author_facet |
Julia Baird Angela Dzyundzyak Ryan Plummer Ryan Bullock Diane Dupont Marilyne Jollineau Wendee Kubik Gary Pickering Liette Vasseur |
author_sort |
Julia Baird |
title |
Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance |
title_short |
Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance |
title_full |
Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance |
title_fullStr |
Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance |
title_sort |
ecosystem perceptions in flood prone areas: a typology and its relationship to preferences for governance |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Water |
issn |
2073-4441 |
publishDate |
2016-05-01 |
description |
A shift appears to be occurring in thinking about flooding, from a resistance-based approach to one of resilience. Accordingly, how stakeholders in flood-prone regions perceive the system and its governance are salient questions. This study queried stakeholders’ internal representations of ecosystems (resistance- or resilience-based), preferences for governance actors and mechanisms for flooding, and the relationship between them in five different regions of the world. The influence of personal experience on these variables was also assessed. Most respondents aligned themselves with a resilience-based approach in relation to system connectedness and response to disturbance; however, respondents were almost evenly split between resistance- and resilience-based approaches when considering system management. Responses generally were considered to hold for other disturbances as well. There was no clear relationship between internal representations and preferences for governance actors or mechanisms. Respondents generally favoured actor combinations that included governments and mechanism combinations that included regulations and policies. Those who had personal experience with flooding tended to align themselves with a resilience-based internal representation of system management, but personal experience showed no clear relationship with governance preferences. The findings support an evolutionary perspective of flood management where emerging paradigms enhance preceding ones, and prompt a critical discussion about the universality of resilience as a framing construct. |
topic |
ecosystem perception flooding governance resilience |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/5/191 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT juliabaird ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT angeladzyundzyak ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT ryanplummer ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT ryanbullock ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT dianedupont ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT marilynejollineau ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT wendeekubik ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT garypickering ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance AT liettevasseur ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance |
_version_ |
1716813892993155072 |