Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance

A shift appears to be occurring in thinking about flooding, from a resistance-based approach to one of resilience. Accordingly, how stakeholders in flood-prone regions perceive the system and its governance are salient questions. This study queried stakeholders’ internal representations of ecosystem...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Baird, Angela Dzyundzyak, Ryan Plummer, Ryan Bullock, Diane Dupont, Marilyne Jollineau, Wendee Kubik, Gary Pickering, Liette Vasseur
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2016-05-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/5/191
id doaj-4d3c9d907f8848bdbefc4999d49a7fe4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d3c9d907f8848bdbefc4999d49a7fe42020-11-24T20:45:51ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412016-05-018519110.3390/w8050191w8050191Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for GovernanceJulia Baird0Angela Dzyundzyak1Ryan Plummer2Ryan Bullock3Diane Dupont4Marilyne Jollineau5Wendee Kubik6Gary Pickering7Liette Vasseur8Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaDepartment of Environmental Studies and Sciences, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2E9, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaEnvironmental Sustainability Research Centre, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, CanadaA shift appears to be occurring in thinking about flooding, from a resistance-based approach to one of resilience. Accordingly, how stakeholders in flood-prone regions perceive the system and its governance are salient questions. This study queried stakeholders’ internal representations of ecosystems (resistance- or resilience-based), preferences for governance actors and mechanisms for flooding, and the relationship between them in five different regions of the world. The influence of personal experience on these variables was also assessed. Most respondents aligned themselves with a resilience-based approach in relation to system connectedness and response to disturbance; however, respondents were almost evenly split between resistance- and resilience-based approaches when considering system management. Responses generally were considered to hold for other disturbances as well. There was no clear relationship between internal representations and preferences for governance actors or mechanisms. Respondents generally favoured actor combinations that included governments and mechanism combinations that included regulations and policies. Those who had personal experience with flooding tended to align themselves with a resilience-based internal representation of system management, but personal experience showed no clear relationship with governance preferences. The findings support an evolutionary perspective of flood management where emerging paradigms enhance preceding ones, and prompt a critical discussion about the universality of resilience as a framing construct.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/5/191ecosystem perceptionfloodinggovernanceresilience
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julia Baird
Angela Dzyundzyak
Ryan Plummer
Ryan Bullock
Diane Dupont
Marilyne Jollineau
Wendee Kubik
Gary Pickering
Liette Vasseur
spellingShingle Julia Baird
Angela Dzyundzyak
Ryan Plummer
Ryan Bullock
Diane Dupont
Marilyne Jollineau
Wendee Kubik
Gary Pickering
Liette Vasseur
Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance
Water
ecosystem perception
flooding
governance
resilience
author_facet Julia Baird
Angela Dzyundzyak
Ryan Plummer
Ryan Bullock
Diane Dupont
Marilyne Jollineau
Wendee Kubik
Gary Pickering
Liette Vasseur
author_sort Julia Baird
title Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance
title_short Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance
title_full Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance
title_fullStr Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance
title_full_unstemmed Ecosystem Perceptions in Flood Prone Areas: A Typology and Its Relationship to Preferences for Governance
title_sort ecosystem perceptions in flood prone areas: a typology and its relationship to preferences for governance
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2016-05-01
description A shift appears to be occurring in thinking about flooding, from a resistance-based approach to one of resilience. Accordingly, how stakeholders in flood-prone regions perceive the system and its governance are salient questions. This study queried stakeholders’ internal representations of ecosystems (resistance- or resilience-based), preferences for governance actors and mechanisms for flooding, and the relationship between them in five different regions of the world. The influence of personal experience on these variables was also assessed. Most respondents aligned themselves with a resilience-based approach in relation to system connectedness and response to disturbance; however, respondents were almost evenly split between resistance- and resilience-based approaches when considering system management. Responses generally were considered to hold for other disturbances as well. There was no clear relationship between internal representations and preferences for governance actors or mechanisms. Respondents generally favoured actor combinations that included governments and mechanism combinations that included regulations and policies. Those who had personal experience with flooding tended to align themselves with a resilience-based internal representation of system management, but personal experience showed no clear relationship with governance preferences. The findings support an evolutionary perspective of flood management where emerging paradigms enhance preceding ones, and prompt a critical discussion about the universality of resilience as a framing construct.
topic ecosystem perception
flooding
governance
resilience
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/8/5/191
work_keys_str_mv AT juliabaird ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT angeladzyundzyak ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT ryanplummer ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT ryanbullock ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT dianedupont ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT marilynejollineau ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT wendeekubik ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT garypickering ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
AT liettevasseur ecosystemperceptionsinfloodproneareasatypologyanditsrelationshiptopreferencesforgovernance
_version_ 1716813892993155072