Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian Portuguese

In languages that assign stress differently according to morphological structure, affixes often fall into different categories. In Brazilian Portuguese, normal suffix words have one stress (Base: [kaˈfɛ] ‘coffee’; suffixed: [kafe-ˈtejɾa] ‘coffee pot’). Special suffix words are claimed to have two st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Madeline Gilbert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2021-02-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1045
id doaj-4d3791288e4b4ca6b50e2eba79eb94b9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d3791288e4b4ca6b50e2eba79eb94b92021-09-02T17:56:45ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352021-02-016110.5334/gjgl.1045604Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian PortugueseMadeline Gilbert0New York University, 10 Washington Place, New York, NYIn languages that assign stress differently according to morphological structure, affixes often fall into different categories. In Brazilian Portuguese, normal suffix words have one stress (Base: [kaˈfɛ] ‘coffee’; suffixed: [kafe-ˈtejɾa] ‘coffee pot’). Special suffix words are claimed to have two stresses, one of which falls in the same location as in the independent base ([ka ˌfɛ-ˈzĩɲu] ‘coffee-DIM’). The special suffixes include diminutive -'(z)inho', superlative '-íssimo', and adverbial '-mente'. This paper reports on a production study showing that stress maintenance on the base of special suffix words is acoustically present through longer duration and marginally higher intensity, and through maintenance of vowel height for mid vowels. Phonologically, the special suffixes are often analyzed as attaching to an independent prosodic word base (e.g.Collischonn 1994; Moreno 1997; Vigário 2003; Guzzo 2018). I cast the analysis in Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz 1993): the phonological differences between special and normal suffixes are due to morphosyntactic differences. Under this analysis, differences between special and normal suffixes are principled rather than arbitrary. Morphological and prosodic structure are both necessary, and prosodic structure mediates between morphology and phonological processes.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1045affix classesstressbrazilian portuguesephonologyphonetics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Madeline Gilbert
spellingShingle Madeline Gilbert
Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian Portuguese
Glossa
affix classes
stress
brazilian portuguese
phonology
phonetics
author_facet Madeline Gilbert
author_sort Madeline Gilbert
title Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian Portuguese
title_short Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian Portuguese
title_full Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian Portuguese
title_fullStr Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian Portuguese
title_full_unstemmed Acoustic evidence for affix classes: A case study of Brazilian Portuguese
title_sort acoustic evidence for affix classes: a case study of brazilian portuguese
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2021-02-01
description In languages that assign stress differently according to morphological structure, affixes often fall into different categories. In Brazilian Portuguese, normal suffix words have one stress (Base: [kaˈfɛ] ‘coffee’; suffixed: [kafe-ˈtejɾa] ‘coffee pot’). Special suffix words are claimed to have two stresses, one of which falls in the same location as in the independent base ([ka ˌfɛ-ˈzĩɲu] ‘coffee-DIM’). The special suffixes include diminutive -'(z)inho', superlative '-íssimo', and adverbial '-mente'. This paper reports on a production study showing that stress maintenance on the base of special suffix words is acoustically present through longer duration and marginally higher intensity, and through maintenance of vowel height for mid vowels. Phonologically, the special suffixes are often analyzed as attaching to an independent prosodic word base (e.g.Collischonn 1994; Moreno 1997; Vigário 2003; Guzzo 2018). I cast the analysis in Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz 1993): the phonological differences between special and normal suffixes are due to morphosyntactic differences. Under this analysis, differences between special and normal suffixes are principled rather than arbitrary. Morphological and prosodic structure are both necessary, and prosodic structure mediates between morphology and phonological processes.
topic affix classes
stress
brazilian portuguese
phonology
phonetics
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/1045
work_keys_str_mv AT madelinegilbert acousticevidenceforaffixclassesacasestudyofbrazilianportuguese
_version_ 1721171728043868160