The case for using the repeatability coefficient when calculating test-retest reliability.
The use of standardised tools is an essential component of evidence-based practice. Reliance on standardised tools places demands on clinicians to understand their properties, strengths, and weaknesses, in order to interpret results and make clinical decisions. This paper makes a case for clinicians...
Main Authors: | Sharmila Vaz, Torbjörn Falkmer, Anne Elizabeth Passmore, Richard Parsons, Pantelis Andreou |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767825?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and measurement error of the self-report version of the social skills rating system in a sample of Australian adolescents.
by: Sharmila Vaz, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
The impact of personal background and school contextual factors on academic competence and mental health functioning across the primary-secondary school transition.
by: Sharmila Vaz, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
School belongingness and mental health functioning across the primary-secondary transition in a mainstream sample: multi-group cross-lagged analyses.
by: Sharmila Vaz, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
The personal and contextual contributors to school belongingness among primary school students.
by: Sharmila Vaz, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Test–retest: Agreement or reliability?
by: André Berchtold
Published: (2016-10-01)