Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived atrial electromechanical delay (AEMD) has been reported to be useful for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, its usefulness remains unknown when analyzed along with patients seemingly at high-risk for AF as controls. From...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kanako Akamatsu, Takahide Ito, Masatoshi Miyamura, Yumiko Kanzaki, Koichi Sohmiya, Masaaki Hoshiga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-06-01
Series:Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12947-020-00205-2
id doaj-4d119b34bb6d4e379e438fe90d4c8461
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d119b34bb6d4e379e438fe90d4c84612020-11-25T03:54:42ZengBMCCardiovascular Ultrasound1476-71202020-06-011811910.1186/s12947-020-00205-2Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillationKanako Akamatsu0Takahide Ito1Masatoshi Miyamura2Yumiko Kanzaki3Koichi Sohmiya4Masaaki Hoshiga5Department of Cardiology, Osaka Medical CollegeDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Medical CollegeDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Medical CollegeDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Medical CollegeDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Medical CollegeDepartment of Cardiology, Osaka Medical CollegeAbstract Background Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived atrial electromechanical delay (AEMD) has been reported to be useful for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, its usefulness remains unknown when analyzed along with patients seemingly at high-risk for AF as controls. From this standpoint, we investigated whether AEMD would be of use for identifying patients with PAF. Methods We retrospectively analyzed TDI recordings to obtain AEMD in 63 PAF patients. Thirty-three patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (MRFs) but without history of AF and 50 healthy individuals served as disease and healthy controls, respectively. AEMD was defined as the time-interval between the electrocardiogram P-wave and the beginning of the spectral TDI-derived A’ for the septal (septal EMD) and lateral (lateral EMD) sides of the mitral annulus. Results There was no significant difference in the left atrial volume index between PAF patients and disease controls (28 ± 9 mL/m2 vs. 27 ± 5 mL/m2). PAF patients had longer AEMD, particularly for the lateral EMD (75 ± 23 ms), compared with disease (62 ± 22 ms, P = 0.009) and healthy (54 ± 24 ms, P < 0.001) controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the lateral EMD (OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.03–1.52, P = 0.023), along with the left atrial volume index (OR 2.25, 95%CI 1.44–3.51, P < 0.001), was one of the significant independent associates of identifying PAF patients. Conclusions This cross-sectional study indicates that even analyzed together with MRFs patients, AEMD remains useful for identifying patients at risk for AF. Our results need to be confirmed by a large-scale prospective study.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12947-020-00205-2Atrial fibrillationTissue Doppler imagingAtrial electromechanical delay
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kanako Akamatsu
Takahide Ito
Masatoshi Miyamura
Yumiko Kanzaki
Koichi Sohmiya
Masaaki Hoshiga
spellingShingle Kanako Akamatsu
Takahide Ito
Masatoshi Miyamura
Yumiko Kanzaki
Koichi Sohmiya
Masaaki Hoshiga
Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
Cardiovascular Ultrasound
Atrial fibrillation
Tissue Doppler imaging
Atrial electromechanical delay
author_facet Kanako Akamatsu
Takahide Ito
Masatoshi Miyamura
Yumiko Kanzaki
Koichi Sohmiya
Masaaki Hoshiga
author_sort Kanako Akamatsu
title Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_short Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_full Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed Usefulness of tissue Doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
title_sort usefulness of tissue doppler-derived atrial electromechanical delay for identifying patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
publisher BMC
series Cardiovascular Ultrasound
issn 1476-7120
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Abstract Background Tissue Doppler imaging (TDI)-derived atrial electromechanical delay (AEMD) has been reported to be useful for detecting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). However, its usefulness remains unknown when analyzed along with patients seemingly at high-risk for AF as controls. From this standpoint, we investigated whether AEMD would be of use for identifying patients with PAF. Methods We retrospectively analyzed TDI recordings to obtain AEMD in 63 PAF patients. Thirty-three patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors (MRFs) but without history of AF and 50 healthy individuals served as disease and healthy controls, respectively. AEMD was defined as the time-interval between the electrocardiogram P-wave and the beginning of the spectral TDI-derived A’ for the septal (septal EMD) and lateral (lateral EMD) sides of the mitral annulus. Results There was no significant difference in the left atrial volume index between PAF patients and disease controls (28 ± 9 mL/m2 vs. 27 ± 5 mL/m2). PAF patients had longer AEMD, particularly for the lateral EMD (75 ± 23 ms), compared with disease (62 ± 22 ms, P = 0.009) and healthy (54 ± 24 ms, P < 0.001) controls. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the lateral EMD (OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.03–1.52, P = 0.023), along with the left atrial volume index (OR 2.25, 95%CI 1.44–3.51, P < 0.001), was one of the significant independent associates of identifying PAF patients. Conclusions This cross-sectional study indicates that even analyzed together with MRFs patients, AEMD remains useful for identifying patients at risk for AF. Our results need to be confirmed by a large-scale prospective study.
topic Atrial fibrillation
Tissue Doppler imaging
Atrial electromechanical delay
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12947-020-00205-2
work_keys_str_mv AT kanakoakamatsu usefulnessoftissuedopplerderivedatrialelectromechanicaldelayforidentifyingpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT takahideito usefulnessoftissuedopplerderivedatrialelectromechanicaldelayforidentifyingpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT masatoshimiyamura usefulnessoftissuedopplerderivedatrialelectromechanicaldelayforidentifyingpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT yumikokanzaki usefulnessoftissuedopplerderivedatrialelectromechanicaldelayforidentifyingpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT koichisohmiya usefulnessoftissuedopplerderivedatrialelectromechanicaldelayforidentifyingpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
AT masaakihoshiga usefulnessoftissuedopplerderivedatrialelectromechanicaldelayforidentifyingpatientswithparoxysmalatrialfibrillation
_version_ 1724472111578218496