Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis

What helps or limits the use of ecosystem services ideas in practice? In this paper we develop and test a new institutionalist-based analytical scheme to explore how ecosystem services as a "new" policy idea might interact with established policy regimes, processes, and norms. The scheme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duncan J. Russel, John Turnpenny
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2020-03-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art9/
id doaj-4d030cf851384f70b035c5a664ba7266
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4d030cf851384f70b035c5a664ba72662020-11-25T02:52:40ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872020-03-01251910.5751/ES-11342-25010911342Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysisDuncan J. Russel0John Turnpenny1Department of Politics, University of Exeter, UKSchool of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies, University of East Anglia, UKWhat helps or limits the use of ecosystem services ideas in practice? In this paper we develop and test a new institutionalist-based analytical scheme to explore how ecosystem services as a "new" policy idea might interact with established policy regimes, processes, and norms. The scheme is based on three different decision-making levels: micro, meso, and macro. To test the plausibility of the scheme, it is applied to the case of the UK where a specific ecosystem services framework (ESF) was prioritized as a new way of doing environmental policy after 2011. Drawing on findings from 32 elite interviews, the paper shows how dynamics at all three levels intersect with differing institutional explanations. It helps explain important factors for embedding, or restricting embedding, of the ESF in policy making. The scheme provides a useful way to link analysis of the "lived experience" of policy actors implementing the ESF with the institutional landscape they occupy, and allows for a nuanced and integrated analysis of the potential barriers faced by ecosystem services ideas generally.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art9/ecosystem services frameworkembeddingenvironmental policy makinginstitutionalism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Duncan J. Russel
John Turnpenny
spellingShingle Duncan J. Russel
John Turnpenny
Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
Ecology and Society
ecosystem services framework
embedding
environmental policy making
institutionalism
author_facet Duncan J. Russel
John Turnpenny
author_sort Duncan J. Russel
title Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
title_short Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
title_full Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
title_fullStr Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
title_full_unstemmed Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
title_sort embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2020-03-01
description What helps or limits the use of ecosystem services ideas in practice? In this paper we develop and test a new institutionalist-based analytical scheme to explore how ecosystem services as a "new" policy idea might interact with established policy regimes, processes, and norms. The scheme is based on three different decision-making levels: micro, meso, and macro. To test the plausibility of the scheme, it is applied to the case of the UK where a specific ecosystem services framework (ESF) was prioritized as a new way of doing environmental policy after 2011. Drawing on findings from 32 elite interviews, the paper shows how dynamics at all three levels intersect with differing institutional explanations. It helps explain important factors for embedding, or restricting embedding, of the ESF in policy making. The scheme provides a useful way to link analysis of the "lived experience" of policy actors implementing the ESF with the institutional landscape they occupy, and allows for a nuanced and integrated analysis of the potential barriers faced by ecosystem services ideas generally.
topic ecosystem services framework
embedding
environmental policy making
institutionalism
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art9/
work_keys_str_mv AT duncanjrussel embeddingecosystemservicesideasintopolicyprocessesaninstitutionalanalysis
AT johnturnpenny embeddingecosystemservicesideasintopolicyprocessesaninstitutionalanalysis
_version_ 1715362296091377664