Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis
What helps or limits the use of ecosystem services ideas in practice? In this paper we develop and test a new institutionalist-based analytical scheme to explore how ecosystem services as a "new" policy idea might interact with established policy regimes, processes, and norms. The scheme...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Resilience Alliance
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Ecology and Society |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art9/ |
id |
doaj-4d030cf851384f70b035c5a664ba7266 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4d030cf851384f70b035c5a664ba72662020-11-25T02:52:40ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872020-03-01251910.5751/ES-11342-25010911342Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysisDuncan J. Russel0John Turnpenny1Department of Politics, University of Exeter, UKSchool of Politics, Philosophy, Language and Communication Studies, University of East Anglia, UKWhat helps or limits the use of ecosystem services ideas in practice? In this paper we develop and test a new institutionalist-based analytical scheme to explore how ecosystem services as a "new" policy idea might interact with established policy regimes, processes, and norms. The scheme is based on three different decision-making levels: micro, meso, and macro. To test the plausibility of the scheme, it is applied to the case of the UK where a specific ecosystem services framework (ESF) was prioritized as a new way of doing environmental policy after 2011. Drawing on findings from 32 elite interviews, the paper shows how dynamics at all three levels intersect with differing institutional explanations. It helps explain important factors for embedding, or restricting embedding, of the ESF in policy making. The scheme provides a useful way to link analysis of the "lived experience" of policy actors implementing the ESF with the institutional landscape they occupy, and allows for a nuanced and integrated analysis of the potential barriers faced by ecosystem services ideas generally.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art9/ecosystem services frameworkembeddingenvironmental policy makinginstitutionalism |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Duncan J. Russel John Turnpenny |
spellingShingle |
Duncan J. Russel John Turnpenny Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis Ecology and Society ecosystem services framework embedding environmental policy making institutionalism |
author_facet |
Duncan J. Russel John Turnpenny |
author_sort |
Duncan J. Russel |
title |
Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis |
title_short |
Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis |
title_full |
Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis |
title_fullStr |
Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis |
title_sort |
embedding ecosystem services ideas into policy processes: an institutional analysis |
publisher |
Resilience Alliance |
series |
Ecology and Society |
issn |
1708-3087 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
What helps or limits the use of ecosystem services ideas in practice? In this paper we develop and test a new institutionalist-based analytical scheme to explore how ecosystem services as a "new" policy idea might interact with established policy regimes, processes, and norms. The scheme is based on three different decision-making levels: micro, meso, and macro. To test the plausibility of the scheme, it is applied to the case of the UK where a specific ecosystem services framework (ESF) was prioritized as a new way of doing environmental policy after 2011. Drawing on findings from 32 elite interviews, the paper shows how dynamics at all three levels intersect with differing institutional explanations. It helps explain important factors for embedding, or restricting embedding, of the ESF in policy making. The scheme provides a useful way to link analysis of the "lived experience" of policy actors implementing the ESF with the institutional landscape they occupy, and allows for a nuanced and integrated analysis of the potential barriers faced by ecosystem services ideas generally. |
topic |
ecosystem services framework embedding environmental policy making institutionalism |
url |
http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss1/art9/ |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT duncanjrussel embeddingecosystemservicesideasintopolicyprocessesaninstitutionalanalysis AT johnturnpenny embeddingecosystemservicesideasintopolicyprocessesaninstitutionalanalysis |
_version_ |
1715362296091377664 |