Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding

Tungsten inert gas welding and vacuum brazing butt joints of Al–Mg–Si alloy 6061 in the artificially aged condition T6 were studied. Constant amplitude and variable amplitude fatigue loading tests were performed. The experimental S-N curves were compared with the fatigue design curves recommended by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Huei Lin, Jiun-Ren Hwang, Chin-Ping Fung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2016-04-01
Series:Advances in Mechanical Engineering
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016643454
id doaj-4cf1db875973417f879dd37d5e56d967
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cf1db875973417f879dd37d5e56d9672020-11-25T02:54:29ZengSAGE PublishingAdvances in Mechanical Engineering1687-81402016-04-01810.1177/168781401664345410.1177_1687814016643454Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas weldingHuei Lin0Jiun-Ren Hwang1Chin-Ping Fung2Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, TaiwanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan City, TaiwanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Oriental Institute of Technology, New Taipei City, TaiwanTungsten inert gas welding and vacuum brazing butt joints of Al–Mg–Si alloy 6061 in the artificially aged condition T6 were studied. Constant amplitude and variable amplitude fatigue loading tests were performed. The experimental S-N curves were compared with the fatigue design curves recommended by the International Institute of Welding, British Standard, and Eurocode 9. Two mean stress correction methods, Goodman and Gerber, were evaluated. In terms of the size effect on the fatigue life, this article proposed an innovational thickness correction method based on the ratio of the ultimate tensile strengths of specimens with different thickness. For vacuum brazing components, the tensile strength–based thickness correction method was better than the thickness correction methods recommended by the International Institute of Welding and Eurocode 9.https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016643454
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Huei Lin
Jiun-Ren Hwang
Chin-Ping Fung
spellingShingle Huei Lin
Jiun-Ren Hwang
Chin-Ping Fung
Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding
Advances in Mechanical Engineering
author_facet Huei Lin
Jiun-Ren Hwang
Chin-Ping Fung
author_sort Huei Lin
title Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding
title_short Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding
title_full Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding
title_fullStr Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding
title_full_unstemmed Fatigue properties of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding
title_sort fatigue properties of 6061-t6 aluminum alloy butt joints processed by vacuum brazing and tungsten inert gas welding
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Advances in Mechanical Engineering
issn 1687-8140
publishDate 2016-04-01
description Tungsten inert gas welding and vacuum brazing butt joints of Al–Mg–Si alloy 6061 in the artificially aged condition T6 were studied. Constant amplitude and variable amplitude fatigue loading tests were performed. The experimental S-N curves were compared with the fatigue design curves recommended by the International Institute of Welding, British Standard, and Eurocode 9. Two mean stress correction methods, Goodman and Gerber, were evaluated. In terms of the size effect on the fatigue life, this article proposed an innovational thickness correction method based on the ratio of the ultimate tensile strengths of specimens with different thickness. For vacuum brazing components, the tensile strength–based thickness correction method was better than the thickness correction methods recommended by the International Institute of Welding and Eurocode 9.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016643454
work_keys_str_mv AT hueilin fatiguepropertiesof6061t6aluminumalloybuttjointsprocessedbyvacuumbrazingandtungsteninertgaswelding
AT jiunrenhwang fatiguepropertiesof6061t6aluminumalloybuttjointsprocessedbyvacuumbrazingandtungsteninertgaswelding
AT chinpingfung fatiguepropertiesof6061t6aluminumalloybuttjointsprocessedbyvacuumbrazingandtungsteninertgaswelding
_version_ 1724720865141063680