Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices

Background. To estimate repeatability and comparability of central corneal thickness (CCT) and keratometry measurements obtained by four different devices in healthy eyes. Methods. Fifty-five healthy eyes from 55 volunteers were enrolled in this study. CCT (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laszlo Kiraly, Jana Stange, Kathleen S. Kunert, Saadettin Sel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2017-01-01
Series:Journal of Ophthalmology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6181405
id doaj-4ce4c40f8bb5450e843cce7de170e8a1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ce4c40f8bb5450e843cce7de170e8a12020-11-24T22:18:11ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Ophthalmology2090-004X2090-00582017-01-01201710.1155/2017/61814056181405Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different DevicesLaszlo Kiraly0Jana Stange1Kathleen S. Kunert2Saadettin Sel3Augen- und Laserzentrum Leipzig, Lampestraße 1, 04107 Leipzig, GermanyErnst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Carl-Zeiß-Promenade 2, 07745 Jena, GermanyErnst-Abbe-Hochschule Jena, Carl-Zeiß-Promenade 2, 07745 Jena, GermanyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120 Heidelberg, GermanyBackground. To estimate repeatability and comparability of central corneal thickness (CCT) and keratometry measurements obtained by four different devices in healthy eyes. Methods. Fifty-five healthy eyes from 55 volunteers were enrolled in this study. CCT (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT) and keratometry readings (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign) were measured. For statistical analysis, the corneal spherocylinder was converted into power vectors (J0, J45). Repeatability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement of measurements between the devices was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method. Results. The analysis of repeatability of CCT data of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT showed high ICCs (range 0.995 to 0.999). The comparison of CCT measurements revealed statistically significant differences between Pentacam HR versus IOLMaster 700 (p<0.0001) and Pentacam HR versus Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.0001), respectively. There was no difference in CCT measurements between IOLMaster 700 and Cirrus HD-OCT (p=0.519). The repeatability of keratometry readings (J0 and J45) of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign was also high with ICCs ranging from 0.974 to 0.999. The Pentacam HR revealed significantly higher J0 in comparison to IOLMaster 700 (p=0.009) and iDesign (p=0.041); however, no significant difference was between IOLMaster 700 and iDesign (p=0.426). Comparison of J45 showed no significant difference between IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign. These results were in accordance with Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion. In clinical practice, the devices analyzed should not be used interchangeably due to low agreement regarding CCT as well as keratometry readings.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6181405
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laszlo Kiraly
Jana Stange
Kathleen S. Kunert
Saadettin Sel
spellingShingle Laszlo Kiraly
Jana Stange
Kathleen S. Kunert
Saadettin Sel
Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
Journal of Ophthalmology
author_facet Laszlo Kiraly
Jana Stange
Kathleen S. Kunert
Saadettin Sel
author_sort Laszlo Kiraly
title Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
title_short Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
title_full Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
title_fullStr Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
title_full_unstemmed Repeatability and Agreement of Central Corneal Thickness and Keratometry Measurements between Four Different Devices
title_sort repeatability and agreement of central corneal thickness and keratometry measurements between four different devices
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 2090-004X
2090-0058
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background. To estimate repeatability and comparability of central corneal thickness (CCT) and keratometry measurements obtained by four different devices in healthy eyes. Methods. Fifty-five healthy eyes from 55 volunteers were enrolled in this study. CCT (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT) and keratometry readings (IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign) were measured. For statistical analysis, the corneal spherocylinder was converted into power vectors (J0, J45). Repeatability was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Agreement of measurements between the devices was evaluated by the Bland-Altman method. Results. The analysis of repeatability of CCT data of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and Cirrus HD-OCT showed high ICCs (range 0.995 to 0.999). The comparison of CCT measurements revealed statistically significant differences between Pentacam HR versus IOLMaster 700 (p<0.0001) and Pentacam HR versus Cirrus HD-OCT (p<0.0001), respectively. There was no difference in CCT measurements between IOLMaster 700 and Cirrus HD-OCT (p=0.519). The repeatability of keratometry readings (J0 and J45) of IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign was also high with ICCs ranging from 0.974 to 0.999. The Pentacam HR revealed significantly higher J0 in comparison to IOLMaster 700 (p=0.009) and iDesign (p=0.041); however, no significant difference was between IOLMaster 700 and iDesign (p=0.426). Comparison of J45 showed no significant difference between IOLMaster 700, Pentacam HR, and iDesign. These results were in accordance with Bland-Altman plots. Conclusion. In clinical practice, the devices analyzed should not be used interchangeably due to low agreement regarding CCT as well as keratometry readings.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/6181405
work_keys_str_mv AT laszlokiraly repeatabilityandagreementofcentralcornealthicknessandkeratometrymeasurementsbetweenfourdifferentdevices
AT janastange repeatabilityandagreementofcentralcornealthicknessandkeratometrymeasurementsbetweenfourdifferentdevices
AT kathleenskunert repeatabilityandagreementofcentralcornealthicknessandkeratometrymeasurementsbetweenfourdifferentdevices
AT saadettinsel repeatabilityandagreementofcentralcornealthicknessandkeratometrymeasurementsbetweenfourdifferentdevices
_version_ 1725782884531306496