Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach
The paper brings together study by economists and anthropologists and aims at a critical investigation of the competing theoretical explanation of the role of violence and beliefs in economic, social and political development. By reconstructing discussion in neo-institutional economic theory over t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Russian |
Published: |
Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
2014-12-01
|
Series: | Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/4_2014/SE.2014.4.148-169.Ryzhova.pdf |
id |
doaj-4ce407f5266e4741b776f9ab11124e41 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4ce407f5266e4741b776f9ab11124e412020-11-24T22:36:42ZrusEconomic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesProstranstvennaâ Èkonomika1815-98342587-59572014-12-01414816910.14530/se.2014.4.148-169Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary ApproachNatalia Petrovna Ryzhova0Economic Research Institute FEB RAS The paper brings together study by economists and anthropologists and aims at a critical investigation of the competing theoretical explanation of the role of violence and beliefs in economic, social and political development. By reconstructing discussion in neo-institutional economic theory over the role of history and culture in current economic performance of under-developed countries, the paper claims that scholars must today pay attention on violence and beliefs. Although economists recently confirmed that these two factors played crucial role in the different development of nations, when some of them accumulate power and wealth, while others fail, the paper argues that more complicated approach is needed. In particular, economists use too simplistic conception of power and violence and refuse to pay attention on beliefs of ordinary people. Social anthropology could suggest both sophisticated approaches to violence and precise attention to ordinary people beliefs. That the reason why anthropological knowledge should be incorporated in neoinstitutional economic theoryhttp://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/4_2014/SE.2014.4.148-169.Ryzhova.pdfinterdisciplinary economic researchsocial anthropologyinstitutionscultureviolencebeliefselite«ordinary people» |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Russian |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova |
spellingShingle |
Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika interdisciplinary economic research social anthropology institutions culture violence beliefs elite «ordinary people» |
author_facet |
Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova |
author_sort |
Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova |
title |
Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach |
title_short |
Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach |
title_full |
Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach |
title_fullStr |
Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach |
title_full_unstemmed |
Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach |
title_sort |
institutions’ research: an interdisciplinary approach |
publisher |
Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences |
series |
Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika |
issn |
1815-9834 2587-5957 |
publishDate |
2014-12-01 |
description |
The paper brings together study by economists and anthropologists and aims at a critical investigation of the competing theoretical explanation of the role of violence and beliefs in economic, social and political development. By reconstructing discussion in neo-institutional economic theory over the role of history and culture in current economic performance of under-developed countries, the paper claims that scholars must today pay attention on violence and beliefs. Although economists recently confirmed that these two factors played crucial role in the different development of nations, when some of them accumulate power and wealth, while others fail, the paper argues that more complicated approach is needed. In particular, economists use too simplistic conception of power and violence and refuse to pay attention on beliefs of ordinary people. Social anthropology could suggest both sophisticated approaches to violence and precise attention to ordinary people beliefs. That the reason why anthropological knowledge should be incorporated in neoinstitutional economic theory |
topic |
interdisciplinary economic research social anthropology institutions culture violence beliefs elite «ordinary people» |
url |
http://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/4_2014/SE.2014.4.148-169.Ryzhova.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nataliapetrovnaryzhova institutionsresearchaninterdisciplinaryapproach |
_version_ |
1725718575259320320 |