Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach

The paper brings together study by economists and anthropologists and aims at a critical investigation of the competing theoretical explanation of the role of violence and beliefs in economic, social and political development. By reconstructing discussion in neo-institutional economic theory over t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences 2014-12-01
Series:Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
Subjects:
Online Access:http://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/4_2014/SE.2014.4.148-169.Ryzhova.pdf
id doaj-4ce407f5266e4741b776f9ab11124e41
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ce407f5266e4741b776f9ab11124e412020-11-24T22:36:42ZrusEconomic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesProstranstvennaâ Èkonomika1815-98342587-59572014-12-01414816910.14530/se.2014.4.148-169Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary ApproachNatalia Petrovna Ryzhova0Economic Research Institute FEB RAS The paper brings together study by economists and anthropologists and aims at a critical investigation of the competing theoretical explanation of the role of violence and beliefs in economic, social and political development. By reconstructing discussion in neo-institutional economic theory over the role of history and culture in current economic performance of under-developed countries, the paper claims that scholars must today pay attention on violence and beliefs. Although economists recently confirmed that these two factors played crucial role in the different development of nations, when some of them accumulate power and wealth, while others fail, the paper argues that more complicated approach is needed. In particular, economists use too simplistic conception of power and violence and refuse to pay attention on beliefs of ordinary people. Social anthropology could suggest both sophisticated approaches to violence and precise attention to ordinary people beliefs. That the reason why anthropological knowledge should be incorporated in neoinstitutional economic theoryhttp://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/4_2014/SE.2014.4.148-169.Ryzhova.pdfinterdisciplinary economic researchsocial anthropologyinstitutionscultureviolencebeliefselite«ordinary people»
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova
spellingShingle Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova
Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach
Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
interdisciplinary economic research
social anthropology
institutions
culture
violence
beliefs
elite
«ordinary people»
author_facet Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova
author_sort Natalia Petrovna Ryzhova
title Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach
title_short Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach
title_full Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach
title_fullStr Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach
title_full_unstemmed Institutions’ Research: an Interdisciplinary Approach
title_sort institutions’ research: an interdisciplinary approach
publisher Economic Research Institute of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
series Prostranstvennaâ Èkonomika
issn 1815-9834
2587-5957
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The paper brings together study by economists and anthropologists and aims at a critical investigation of the competing theoretical explanation of the role of violence and beliefs in economic, social and political development. By reconstructing discussion in neo-institutional economic theory over the role of history and culture in current economic performance of under-developed countries, the paper claims that scholars must today pay attention on violence and beliefs. Although economists recently confirmed that these two factors played crucial role in the different development of nations, when some of them accumulate power and wealth, while others fail, the paper argues that more complicated approach is needed. In particular, economists use too simplistic conception of power and violence and refuse to pay attention on beliefs of ordinary people. Social anthropology could suggest both sophisticated approaches to violence and precise attention to ordinary people beliefs. That the reason why anthropological knowledge should be incorporated in neoinstitutional economic theory
topic interdisciplinary economic research
social anthropology
institutions
culture
violence
beliefs
elite
«ordinary people»
url http://spatial-economics.com/eng/images/spatial-econimics/4_2014/SE.2014.4.148-169.Ryzhova.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nataliapetrovnaryzhova institutionsresearchaninterdisciplinaryapproach
_version_ 1725718575259320320