Recognition and Justice

Paul Ricœur devoted much of his last ten years to studies and analyses of justice and recognition. This paper will trace the indelible bonds between justice and recognition and claim that recognition is a necessary condition for justice and that justice is the telos or goal of recognition. I begin t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Charles Reagan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2016-01-01
Series:Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/276
id doaj-4ce38e5897a44bdebb574b7c16f6254d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4ce38e5897a44bdebb574b7c16f6254d2020-11-25T00:34:59ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghÉtudes Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies2156-78082016-01-016210.5195/errs.2015.276141Recognition and JusticeCharles Reagan0Kansas State University, USAPaul Ricœur devoted much of his last ten years to studies and analyses of justice and recognition. This paper will trace the indelible bonds between justice and recognition and claim that recognition is a necessary condition for justice and that justice is the telos or goal of recognition. I begin this paper with a review of the multiple meanings of recognition in the two famous French dictionaries, the Littré (1859-1872) and the Le Grand Robert (1985). In his book, The Course of Recognition (2005), Ricoeur groups recognition under three headings, recognition as a form of knowledge or cognition (epistemological), self-recognition, and recognition of the other on the social and judicial level. The complexities of the meanings of “to recognize” and “recognition” are important in their roles in the realm of justice. I include in the concept of justice, the judiciary, both civil and criminal; distributive justice; and, social and political justice. For each one of these, there are multiple meanings of recognition that are important to understanding their foundation and their scope. There are meanings of recognition that are relevant to other aspects of social justice as the recognition of marginal, oppressed, devalued, groups as deserving of being treated as equals. The structure of my paper is to go through the various meanings and categories of meanings of “to recognize” and “recognition.” I give an account of each of the types of justice and show how various kinds of recognition are relevant to each kind of justice.http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/276Justice, Recognition,
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charles Reagan
spellingShingle Charles Reagan
Recognition and Justice
Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
Justice, Recognition,
author_facet Charles Reagan
author_sort Charles Reagan
title Recognition and Justice
title_short Recognition and Justice
title_full Recognition and Justice
title_fullStr Recognition and Justice
title_full_unstemmed Recognition and Justice
title_sort recognition and justice
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Études Ricoeuriennes / Ricoeur Studies
issn 2156-7808
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Paul Ricœur devoted much of his last ten years to studies and analyses of justice and recognition. This paper will trace the indelible bonds between justice and recognition and claim that recognition is a necessary condition for justice and that justice is the telos or goal of recognition. I begin this paper with a review of the multiple meanings of recognition in the two famous French dictionaries, the Littré (1859-1872) and the Le Grand Robert (1985). In his book, The Course of Recognition (2005), Ricoeur groups recognition under three headings, recognition as a form of knowledge or cognition (epistemological), self-recognition, and recognition of the other on the social and judicial level. The complexities of the meanings of “to recognize” and “recognition” are important in their roles in the realm of justice. I include in the concept of justice, the judiciary, both civil and criminal; distributive justice; and, social and political justice. For each one of these, there are multiple meanings of recognition that are important to understanding their foundation and their scope. There are meanings of recognition that are relevant to other aspects of social justice as the recognition of marginal, oppressed, devalued, groups as deserving of being treated as equals. The structure of my paper is to go through the various meanings and categories of meanings of “to recognize” and “recognition.” I give an account of each of the types of justice and show how various kinds of recognition are relevant to each kind of justice.
topic Justice, Recognition,
url http://ricoeur.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/ricoeur/article/view/276
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesreagan recognitionandjustice
_version_ 1725311073706311680