| Summary: | Background/Purpose: Superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) lesion repair poses a significant discussion due to its high failure rate. The purpose of this study was to determine in which indications it is better to perform a tenodesis than a straight anatomical repair. The hypothesis was that in middle-aged patients and in those who did not suffer from a traumatic lesion, it is better to perform a long biceps tendon (LBT) tenodesis than a straight anatomical repair.
Methods: A total of 22 patients between the ages of 19 years and 55 years who underwent SLAP lesion repair between 2007 and 2011 were reviewed. The cases were divided into the following two groups: those with an isolated SLAP lesion (15 patients) and those with both a SLAP and a Bankart lesion (7 patients). This was a level IV longitudinal and retrospective study.
Results: Eight patients had persistent postoperative pain, which required to be revised from an anatomical repair to an LBT tenodesis. All of these patients were in the isolated SLAP lesion group. The average time between primary surgery and revision was 21.6 months. Patients over the age of 45 years had significantly poorer results after the repair.
Conclusion: Biceps tenodesis is a feasible therapeutic alternative to anatomical repair for the treatment of SLAP lesions in middle-aged patients; the reinsertion failure rates for this type of lesion are rather discouraging due to the high percentage of revision surgeries that must be carried out after the primary intervention.
|
|---|
