Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-11-01
|
Series: | Plants |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/11/1544 |
id |
doaj-4cc8e6bcac864afbaebe6d77c3d15ec3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-4cc8e6bcac864afbaebe6d77c3d15ec32020-11-25T04:10:33ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472020-11-0191544154410.3390/plants9111544Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and FutureTammy Stackhouse0Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza1Md Emran Ali2Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USADepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223, USADepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USATurfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/11/1544plant pathologydisease detectionbiotechnologyhistorymolecular detectiondisease monitoring |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tammy Stackhouse Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza Md Emran Ali |
spellingShingle |
Tammy Stackhouse Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza Md Emran Ali Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future Plants plant pathology disease detection biotechnology history molecular detection disease monitoring |
author_facet |
Tammy Stackhouse Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza Md Emran Ali |
author_sort |
Tammy Stackhouse |
title |
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_short |
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full |
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_fullStr |
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_full_unstemmed |
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future |
title_sort |
turfgrass disease diagnosis: past, present, and future |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Plants |
issn |
2223-7747 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection. |
topic |
plant pathology disease detection biotechnology history molecular detection disease monitoring |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/11/1544 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT tammystackhouse turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture AT alfredodmartinezespinoza turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture AT mdemranali turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture |
_version_ |
1724420170584162304 |