Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future

Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tammy Stackhouse, Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza, Md Emran Ali
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-11-01
Series:Plants
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/11/1544
id doaj-4cc8e6bcac864afbaebe6d77c3d15ec3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cc8e6bcac864afbaebe6d77c3d15ec32020-11-25T04:10:33ZengMDPI AGPlants2223-77472020-11-0191544154410.3390/plants9111544Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and FutureTammy Stackhouse0Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza1Md Emran Ali2Department of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USADepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Griffin, GA 30223, USADepartment of Plant Pathology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA 31793, USATurfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection.https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/11/1544plant pathologydisease detectionbiotechnologyhistorymolecular detectiondisease monitoring
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tammy Stackhouse
Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza
Md Emran Ali
spellingShingle Tammy Stackhouse
Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza
Md Emran Ali
Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
Plants
plant pathology
disease detection
biotechnology
history
molecular detection
disease monitoring
author_facet Tammy Stackhouse
Alfredo D. Martinez-Espinoza
Md Emran Ali
author_sort Tammy Stackhouse
title Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_short Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_full Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_fullStr Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_full_unstemmed Turfgrass Disease Diagnosis: Past, Present, and Future
title_sort turfgrass disease diagnosis: past, present, and future
publisher MDPI AG
series Plants
issn 2223-7747
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Turfgrass is a multibillion-dollar industry severely affected by plant pathogens including fungi, bacteria, viruses, and nematodes. Many of the diseases in turfgrass have similar signs and symptoms, making it difficult to diagnose the specific problem pathogen. Incorrect diagnosis leads to the delay of treatment and excessive use of chemicals. To effectively control these diseases, it is important to have rapid and accurate detection systems in the early stages of infection that harbor relatively low pathogen populations. There are many methods for diagnosing pathogens on turfgrass. Traditional methods include symptoms, morphology, and microscopy identification. These have been followed by nucleic acid detection and onsite detection techniques. Many of these methods allow for rapid diagnosis, some even within the field without much expertise. There are several methods that have great potential, such as high-throughput sequencing and remote sensing. Utilization of these techniques for disease diagnosis allows for faster and accurate disease diagnosis and a reduction in damage and cost of control. Understanding of each of these techniques can allow researchers to select which method is best suited for their pathogen of interest. The objective of this article is to provide an overview of the turfgrass diagnostics efforts used and highlight prospects for disease detection.
topic plant pathology
disease detection
biotechnology
history
molecular detection
disease monitoring
url https://www.mdpi.com/2223-7747/9/11/1544
work_keys_str_mv AT tammystackhouse turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture
AT alfredodmartinezespinoza turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture
AT mdemranali turfgrassdiseasediagnosispastpresentandfuture
_version_ 1724420170584162304