What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy

Functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a relatively new technique complimentary to EEG for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). NIRS-based systems for detecting various cognitive and affective states such as mental and emotional stress have already been demonstrated in a ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Megan eStrait, Matthias eScheutz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2014.00117/full
id doaj-4cb707b8b7d449859caa804fb54512fc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cb707b8b7d449859caa804fb54512fc2020-11-24T22:29:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2014-05-01810.3389/fnins.2014.0011783507What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopyMegan eStrait0Matthias eScheutz1Tufts UniversityTufts UniversityFunctional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a relatively new technique complimentary to EEG for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). NIRS-based systems for detecting various cognitive and affective states such as mental and emotional stress have already been demonstrated in a range of adaptive human-computer interaction (HCI) applications. However, before NIRS-BCIs can be used reliably in realistic HCI settings, substantial challenges concerning signal processing and modeling must be addressed. Although many of those challenges have been identified previously, the solutions to overcome them remain scant.<br/><br/> In this paper, we first review what can be currently done with NIRS, specifically, NIRS-based approaches to measuring cognitive and affective user states as well as demonstrations of passive NIRS-BCIs. We then discuss some of the primary challenges these systems would face if deployed in more realistic settings, including detection latencies and motion artifacts. Lastly, we investigate the effects of some of these challenges on signal reliability via a quantitative comparison of three NIRS models. The hope is that this paper will actively engage researchers to facilitate the advancement of NIRS as a more robust and useful tool to the BCI community.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2014.00117/fullfunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)human-computer interactionReliabilitySignal processingbrain-computer interface (BCI)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Megan eStrait
Matthias eScheutz
spellingShingle Megan eStrait
Matthias eScheutz
What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy
Frontiers in Neuroscience
functional near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)
human-computer interaction
Reliability
Signal processing
brain-computer interface (BCI)
author_facet Megan eStrait
Matthias eScheutz
author_sort Megan eStrait
title What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy
title_short What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy
title_full What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy
title_fullStr What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy
title_full_unstemmed What we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy
title_sort what we can and cannot (yet) do with functional near infrared spectroscopy
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2014-05-01
description Functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) is a relatively new technique complimentary to EEG for the development of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs). NIRS-based systems for detecting various cognitive and affective states such as mental and emotional stress have already been demonstrated in a range of adaptive human-computer interaction (HCI) applications. However, before NIRS-BCIs can be used reliably in realistic HCI settings, substantial challenges concerning signal processing and modeling must be addressed. Although many of those challenges have been identified previously, the solutions to overcome them remain scant.<br/><br/> In this paper, we first review what can be currently done with NIRS, specifically, NIRS-based approaches to measuring cognitive and affective user states as well as demonstrations of passive NIRS-BCIs. We then discuss some of the primary challenges these systems would face if deployed in more realistic settings, including detection latencies and motion artifacts. Lastly, we investigate the effects of some of these challenges on signal reliability via a quantitative comparison of three NIRS models. The hope is that this paper will actively engage researchers to facilitate the advancement of NIRS as a more robust and useful tool to the BCI community.
topic functional near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)
human-computer interaction
Reliability
Signal processing
brain-computer interface (BCI)
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnins.2014.00117/full
work_keys_str_mv AT meganestrait whatwecanandcannotyetdowithfunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopy
AT matthiasescheutz whatwecanandcannotyetdowithfunctionalnearinfraredspectroscopy
_version_ 1725742842140164096