Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States

Mandatory pension systems occupy a central role in the system of social security because of the share of social expenditure in national economies. One of the goals of pension system is to redistribute incomes among individuals. However, it is not clear how the intentions to redistribute incomes coin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dunajevas Eugenijus, Skučienė Daiva
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2016-12-01
Series:Central European Journal of Public Policy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0025
id doaj-4cb2537115224fc4a71d2a640e117e46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cb2537115224fc4a71d2a640e117e462021-09-06T19:19:32ZengSciendoCentral European Journal of Public Policy1802-48662016-12-01102162910.1515/cejpp-2016-0025cejpp-2016-0025Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic StatesDunajevas Eugenijus0Skučienė Daiva1Vilniaus Universitetas, Lithuania.Vilniaus Universitetas, Lithuania.Mandatory pension systems occupy a central role in the system of social security because of the share of social expenditure in national economies. One of the goals of pension system is to redistribute incomes among individuals. However, it is not clear how the intentions to redistribute incomes coincide with the outcomes. In this paper, we will study the difference between the intentions as they are articulated within institutions, with the outcomes that are generated by them. We use the method of comparative institutional analysis in order to find out the differences. Our comparative institutional analysis is based on the grammar of institutions that is proposed by Crawford and Ostrom. Also, in order to understand the differences, we will compare the institutions in relatively similar cases – the Baltic States. The results show that there is a gap between the intentions and outcomes to redistribute incomes among individuals. The findings from the comparative institutional analysis suggest that the most redistributive old age pension system is in Estonia. However, according to the factual information from Eurostat, the greatest distributive effect is produced by the mandatory pension system of Lithuania.https://doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0025redistributionmandatory pension systeminstitutionscomparative analysisbaltic states
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dunajevas Eugenijus
Skučienė Daiva
spellingShingle Dunajevas Eugenijus
Skučienė Daiva
Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States
Central European Journal of Public Policy
redistribution
mandatory pension system
institutions
comparative analysis
baltic states
author_facet Dunajevas Eugenijus
Skučienė Daiva
author_sort Dunajevas Eugenijus
title Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States
title_short Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States
title_full Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States
title_fullStr Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States
title_full_unstemmed Mandatory Pension System and Redistribution: The Comparative Analysis of Institutions in Baltic States
title_sort mandatory pension system and redistribution: the comparative analysis of institutions in baltic states
publisher Sciendo
series Central European Journal of Public Policy
issn 1802-4866
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Mandatory pension systems occupy a central role in the system of social security because of the share of social expenditure in national economies. One of the goals of pension system is to redistribute incomes among individuals. However, it is not clear how the intentions to redistribute incomes coincide with the outcomes. In this paper, we will study the difference between the intentions as they are articulated within institutions, with the outcomes that are generated by them. We use the method of comparative institutional analysis in order to find out the differences. Our comparative institutional analysis is based on the grammar of institutions that is proposed by Crawford and Ostrom. Also, in order to understand the differences, we will compare the institutions in relatively similar cases – the Baltic States. The results show that there is a gap between the intentions and outcomes to redistribute incomes among individuals. The findings from the comparative institutional analysis suggest that the most redistributive old age pension system is in Estonia. However, according to the factual information from Eurostat, the greatest distributive effect is produced by the mandatory pension system of Lithuania.
topic redistribution
mandatory pension system
institutions
comparative analysis
baltic states
url https://doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0025
work_keys_str_mv AT dunajevaseugenijus mandatorypensionsystemandredistributionthecomparativeanalysisofinstitutionsinbalticstates
AT skucienedaiva mandatorypensionsystemandredistributionthecomparativeanalysisofinstitutionsinbalticstates
_version_ 1717778380290523136