Testing Writing on Computers

Computer use has grown rapidly during the past decade. Within the educational community, interest in authentic assessment has also increased. To enhance the authenticity of tests of writing, as well as of other knowledge and skills, some assessments require students to respond in written form via pa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Russell, Walt Haney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 1997-01-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Online Access:http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/604
id doaj-4cafddc84c6f41029d61fb5600b1a04d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-4cafddc84c6f41029d61fb5600b1a04d2020-11-25T03:11:48ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23411997-01-0153Testing Writing on ComputersMichael RussellWalt HaneyComputer use has grown rapidly during the past decade. Within the educational community, interest in authentic assessment has also increased. To enhance the authenticity of tests of writing, as well as of other knowledge and skills, some assessments require students to respond in written form via paper-and-pencil. However, as increasing numbers of students grow accustomed to writing on computers, these assessments may yield underestimates of students' writing abilities. This article presents the findings of a small study examining the effect that mode of administration -- computer versus paper-and-pencil -- has on middle school students' performance on multiple-choice and written test questions. Findings show that, though multiple-choice test results do not differ much by mode of administration, for students accustomed to writing on computer, responses written on computer are substantially higher than those written by hand (effect size of 0.9 and relative success rates of 67% versus 30%). Implications are discussed in terms of both future research and test validity. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/604
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Russell
Walt Haney
spellingShingle Michael Russell
Walt Haney
Testing Writing on Computers
Education Policy Analysis Archives
author_facet Michael Russell
Walt Haney
author_sort Michael Russell
title Testing Writing on Computers
title_short Testing Writing on Computers
title_full Testing Writing on Computers
title_fullStr Testing Writing on Computers
title_full_unstemmed Testing Writing on Computers
title_sort testing writing on computers
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 1997-01-01
description Computer use has grown rapidly during the past decade. Within the educational community, interest in authentic assessment has also increased. To enhance the authenticity of tests of writing, as well as of other knowledge and skills, some assessments require students to respond in written form via paper-and-pencil. However, as increasing numbers of students grow accustomed to writing on computers, these assessments may yield underestimates of students' writing abilities. This article presents the findings of a small study examining the effect that mode of administration -- computer versus paper-and-pencil -- has on middle school students' performance on multiple-choice and written test questions. Findings show that, though multiple-choice test results do not differ much by mode of administration, for students accustomed to writing on computer, responses written on computer are substantially higher than those written by hand (effect size of 0.9 and relative success rates of 67% versus 30%). Implications are discussed in terms of both future research and test validity.
url http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/604
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelrussell testingwritingoncomputers
AT walthaney testingwritingoncomputers
_version_ 1724652973847478272